Skip to main content
AVOID.NET

Garden Finance Cross-Chain Bridge — July 2026 Solver Database Exploit

avoid.net/garden-finance-cross-chain-bridge-july-2026-solver-database-exploit→3/100·82% conf.
[AI-DRAFTED · AWAITING FACT-CHECK]

Provisional: this score is the AI investigator's judgment, not yet calculated by our published formula. Treat it as indicative. How scoring works →

anchored·5LSaGN…bkYX

Summary

Garden Finance is a cross-chain atomic swap protocol that uses Hash Time-Locked Contracts (HTLCs) to facilitate trustless swaps between Bitcoin and EVM-chain assets. On July 26, 2026, an attacker compromised the off-chain database of an independent solver and inserted fraudulent transaction records, draining approximately $450,000 in USDT across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and BNB Smart Chain. This was the protocol's second major security incident in under a year, following a substantially larger $11 million breach in October 2025 that involved a North Korea-affiliated threat actor group.

Connected Entities

8 entities · 60 linked investigations
Organizations
□Ethereum90□Arbitrum□SwissBorg□Garden□ZachXBT
Protocols
⌂Garden Finance⌂Garden Finance Cross-Chain Bridge — July 2026 Solver Database Exploit
Tokens
♦Bitcoin
Relationships
  • Ethereum→mentioned with→Bitcoin(60%)
  • Garden Finance Cross-Chain Bridge — July 2026 Solver Database Exploit→mentioned with→Arbitrum(70%)
  • Garden Finance Cross-Chain Bridge — July 2026 Solver Database Exploit→mentioned with→Garden(70%)
  • Garden Finance Cross-Chain Bridge — July 2026 Solver Database Exploit→mentioned with→Bitcoin(65%)
  • Garden Finance Cross-Chain Bridge — July 2026 Solver Database Exploit→mentioned with→ZachXBT(70%)
  • Garden Finance Cross-Chain Bridge — July 2026 Solver Database Exploit→mentioned with→Ethereum(70%)
  • ZachXBT→mentioned with→Ethereum(70%)
  • ZachXBT→mentioned with→Bitcoin(65%)
  • Garden Finance→mentioned with→Arbitrum(70%)
  • Garden Finance→mentioned with→Bitcoin(80%)
  • + 13 more

Connected Through

7 shared actors · 619 investigations

Distinct actors this investigation shares with others — holders, traders, and named parties. Shared infrastructure (exchanges, pools) is excluded.

Have evidence about Garden Finance Cross-Chain Bridge — July 2026 Solver Database Exploit?

Timeline(7 events)

December 2023

Garden Finance launched as a cross-chain atomic swap protocol, developed by former RenBTC team members including co-founder Jaz Gulati.

Bitget Wallet

30 October 2025

An attacker gained unauthorized access to the operating environment of one of Garden Finance's largest independent solvers, draining approximately $11.4 million in crypto assets. EY forensic investigation later confirmed suspicious SSH access from IP addresses in Japan and China. ZachXBT attributed the attack to the DPRK-affiliated DangerousPassword group.

The Register

31 October 2025

Garden Finance publicly disclosed the October 2025 breach, temporarily shut down its application, and offered a 10% bounty to the attacker for return of funds.

The Register

2 June 2026

ZachXBT published analysis on X alleging that over 80% of Garden Finance's recent fee revenue — 38.86 BTC collected over 12 days — derived from laundering funds stolen in the February 2025 Bybit hack, attributed to the Lazarus Group. Co-founder Jaz Gulati disputed the claim.

BitDegree

26 July 2026

Blockaid detected an active, ongoing exploit on Garden Finance's HTLC contracts at approximately 9:30 PM UTC, flagging the attacker address (0x25b...6999) and approximately $450,000 in USDT drained across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and BNB Smart Chain.

CoinTelegraph

26 July 2026

Garden Finance took its application offline as a precaution and confirmed the exploit originated from the compromise of an independent solver's off-chain database. The team engaged zeroShadow, Quantstamp, and Blockaid to assist with asset tracing and recovery.

Crypto.news

27 July 2026

Garden Finance issued a public statement confirming the breach was limited to the solver layer, that HTLC smart contracts were not compromised, and that no user funds were at risk. The team stated it was still verifying the total amount lost and provided no timeline for service restoration.

CryptoTimes
Provenance & Audit Trail

Decision Log

  • #4reviewRecorded on Solana ✓9/9/2026, 3:05:13 AM
    slot 445506484 · hash HPq2UUkTKiug9JUVi5q9pRD2HyuMrDqdezrEYyZzZoRA
  • #3review revise-15Recorded on Solana ✓8/25/2026, 10:47:35 PM
    slot 443518092 · hash DUhH7BJqBEWcP834Q8iPFMw3KzMiKe5K8XVwmcHEnnNp
  • #2reviewRecorded on Solana ✓8/25/2026, 10:47:35 PM
    slot 443518085 · hash CB1pT8K25m8HPXov39HcRK333SsRAUcz53HPLy8XJ1AZ
  • #1publishRecorded on Solana ✓8/7/2026, 12:20:39 PM
    slot 443504678 · hash 5uXrhm5FbaWSphqezMr6uv95HBm4DThcEpJPAs4CQgtw

This investigation is cryptographically anchored to the Solana blockchain (4 decisions). 15 of 15 cited source URLs have an Internet Archive snapshot.

Fact-checked 2026-09-0719 claims checked2 corrections pending0 applied⛓ anchoredSee findings →

model: claude-sonnet-4-6

generated: 8/7/2026, 12:20:31 PM

last updated: 8/25/2026, 10:47:36 PM

5 views

avoid.net — verified advice for a post-truth world