Audit log

Every state-changing event for Everlyn: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-11-01 13:53:23Z
   Score: 55 → 55 (no score change)
   The listing facts (supply, date, product description, volatility warning) match the MEXC announcement. The $15M funding and Mysten Labs involvement are corroborated by secondary coverage, though the 'led by' framing is not uniform across sources and the page already hedges. No contradicted claims were found. The sourcing is thin and mostly promotional, as the page itself admits. An unverified wash-trading report was seen but could not be read.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,116,030

   sig

   5vXsNbchekF2…tbbRH7gLcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   2V4hKf4EdCLr…v3qt1V5xcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1286 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"d42560c7e9c5b535c49a7574cb32a6cd","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:53:22.983Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"89f5Rf1p7V4fb1uxb7R1KwzVb2bgXkCMHU2DhyTnAQU4","investigation_id":"dde0f6f2-b50a-4830-86bf-b4e54b665cd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":55,"page_content_hash":"44497f589245e32c9fad96751117671b02857f3ca9d83dd29ae50d82e456f200","page_slug":"everlyn","prev_score":55,"reason":"The listing facts (supply, date, product description, volatility warning) match the MEXC announcement. The $15M funding and Mysten Labs involvement are corroborated by secondary coverage, though the 'led by' framing is not uniform across sources and the page already hedges. No contradicted claims were found. The sourcing is thin and mostly promotional, as the page itself admits. An unverified wash-trading report was seen but could not be read.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":1,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision e7c389a5-a419-4ba3-8104-caf3bec6bdc4copy
2. #2review approveby judgejudge

   2026-11-01 13:53:23Z
   Score: 55 → 55 (no score change)
   None of the 8 countable claims were disputed or left unverifiable (0%); claim_findings[5], the price and all-time-high claim, was excluded because the CoinMarketCap source was blocked to the reviewer, which is a coverage limit and not a defect of the page. The listing facts (supply, 2025-10-06 date, product description, volatility warning) match the MEXC announcement, and the $15M funding and Mysten Labs involvement are corroborated by secondary coverage, with claim_findings[1] only partially supported because the 'led by' framing varies across sources and the page already says lists vary. No omission findings were reported and the subject status shows no contradiction with the page. The open high-priority gaps (team and audit, on-chain token analysis) are already disclosed on the page as unverified, so they suggest expanding the page and do not call for a penalty.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,116,036

   sig

   3FMrgznX8VK5…jcTsLQWUcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   925oJZ2j6ABd…3Pz6o82Ycopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1550 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"d42560c7e9c5b535c49a7574cb32a6cd","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:53:22.983Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"dde0f6f2-b50a-4830-86bf-b4e54b665cd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":55,"page_slug":"everlyn","prev_score":55,"reason":"None of the 8 countable claims were disputed or left unverifiable (0%); claim_findings[5], the price and all-time-high claim, was excluded because the CoinMarketCap source was blocked to the reviewer, which is a coverage limit and not a defect of the page. The listing facts (supply, 2025-10-06 date, product description, volatility warning) match the MEXC announcement, and the $15M funding and Mysten Labs involvement are corroborated by secondary coverage, with claim_findings[1] only partially supported because the 'led by' framing varies across sources and the page already says lists vary. No omission findings were reported and the subject status shows no contradiction with the page. The open high-priority gaps (team and audit, on-chain token analysis) are already disclosed on the page as unverified, so they suggest expanding the page and do not call for a penalty.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision ca433fbf-6484-4563-86b6-58401699d7fccopy
3. #3reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-11-01 21:35:35Z
   Score: 55 → 55 (no score change)
   The page is heavily hedged and its checkable claims hold. The MEXC listing date, total supply, 25-second claim and BSC contract match the announcement. The $15M round with Mysten Labs is corroborated by search results, but the lead role and the $250M valuation come from secondary outlets. The all-time-high figure of near $1 conflicts with a snippet showing about $0.61. The page omits the large price decline. Two cited sources were blocked, so several checks rest on search snippets.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,245,401

   sig

   SN15nZWLryz4…J9EiFhv3copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   8udDsqHBfovG…iF7n1R1kcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1369 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"5253080bcb6bd11cfb6b271360e864d4","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T21:35:35.846Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1429,"findings_hash":"6fHJMfDsKhnqh9ZZj75oCv7oyoBMSP3EykSJwcw53T7f","investigation_id":"dde0f6f2-b50a-4830-86bf-b4e54b665cd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":55,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"44497f589245e32c9fad96751117671b02857f3ca9d83dd29ae50d82e456f200","page_slug":"everlyn","prev_score":55,"reason":"The page is heavily hedged and its checkable claims hold. The MEXC listing date, total supply, 25-second claim and BSC contract match the announcement. The $15M round with Mysten Labs is corroborated by search results, but the lead role and the $250M valuation come from secondary outlets. The all-time-high figure of near $1 conflicts with a snippet showing about $0.61. The page omits the large price decline. Two cited sources were blocked, so several checks rest on search snippets.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 013298ed-89b6-47b8-9fb8-9a590a28231ccopy
4. #4review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-11-01 21:35:36Z
   Score: 55 → 51 (-4)
   Of 7 countable claim findings (one blocked-source finding is excluded), none were disputed and 1 was unverifiable (claim_findings[5], the absence of scam or lawsuit reports), giving 14%, which falls in the minor band. The checkable claims (MEXC listing date, supply, 25-second product claim, $15M round) hold, but claim_findings[6] shows the stated all-time high of 'near $1' conflicts with a reported figure of about $0.61, and claim_findings[4] shows the Mysten Labs lead role is not confirmed from a primary source. The review also reports a material omission, a reported price drop of over 95% since launch, and a high-priority gap on team, audit and on-chain data, so the page should be revised rather than approved.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,245,407

   sig

   FdPYLiRYjNbh…FQKchgcscopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   7mebadfiUDnu…YWWJ6eWBcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (2015 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"5253080bcb6bd11cfb6b271360e864d4","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T21:35:35.846Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1429,"investigation_id":"dde0f6f2-b50a-4830-86bf-b4e54b665cd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":51,"page_slug":"everlyn","prev_score":55,"reason":"Of 7 countable claim findings (one blocked-source finding is excluded), none were disputed and 1 was unverifiable (claim_findings[5], the absence of scam or lawsuit reports), giving 14%, which falls in the minor band. The checkable claims (MEXC listing date, supply, 25-second product claim, $15M round) hold, but claim_findings[6] shows the stated all-time high of 'near $1' conflicts with a reported figure of about $0.61, and claim_findings[4] shows the Mysten Labs lead role is not confirmed from a primary source. The review also reports a material omission, a reported price drop of over 95% since launch, and a high-priority gap on team, audit and on-chain data, so the page should be revised rather than approved.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-4,"score_limit":{"applied":-4,"limited":true,"proposed":-12,"rule":"limited_no_second_opinion","second":null},"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":4,"severity_override":{"applied":false,"band":null,"from_band":"minor","reason":"The material omission (a reported price decline of more than 95% from the October 2025 high) rests only on a search snippet the reviewer could not open, and the reviewer's confidence is 0.5. The page already calls the token volatile and carries a medium-severity market-risk section, so the omission does not justify a harsher band than the one the percentages give. It is reflected in the delta within the minor band instead."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 04771375-6de8-48d2-ab94-8f9d092f247dcopy