Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Everlyn
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 55 → 51 (-4)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464245407
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-01T21:35:36.103Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-01T21:36:05.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-01T21:36:05.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 7mebadfiUDnufTRSPZ1UHHsfHq53U7SvKbEsYWWJ6eWB
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2015 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"5253080bcb6bd11cfb6b271360e864d4","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T21:35:35.846Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1429,"investigation_id":"dde0f6f2-b50a-4830-86bf-b4e54b665cd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":51,"page_slug":"everlyn","prev_score":55,"reason":"Of 7 countable claim findings (one blocked-source finding is excluded), none were disputed and 1 was unverifiable (claim_findings[5], the absence of scam or lawsuit reports), giving 14%, which falls in the minor band. The checkable claims (MEXC listing date, supply, 25-second product claim, $15M round) hold, but claim_findings[6] shows the stated all-time high of 'near $1' conflicts with a reported figure of about $0.61, and claim_findings[4] shows the Mysten Labs lead role is not confirmed from a primary source. The review also reports a material omission, a reported price drop of over 95% since launch, and a high-priority gap on team, audit and on-chain data, so the page should be revised rather than approved.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-4,"score_limit":{"applied":-4,"limited":true,"proposed":-12,"rule":"limited_no_second_opinion","second":null},"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":4,"severity_override":{"applied":false,"band":null,"from_band":"minor","reason":"The material omission (a reported price decline of more than 95% from the October 2025 high) rests only on a search snippet the reviewer could not open, and the reviewer's confidence is 0.5. The page already calls the token volatile and carries a medium-severity market-risk section, so the omission does not justify a harsher band than the one the percentages give. It is reflected in the delta within the minor band instead."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}