Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Everlyn
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 55 → 55 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464116036
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-01T13:53:23.246Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-01T13:53:46.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-01T13:53:46.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 925oJZ2j6ABdrjuyyERYjc23GNWNzVrCMdor3Pz6o82Y
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1550 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"d42560c7e9c5b535c49a7574cb32a6cd","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:53:22.983Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"dde0f6f2-b50a-4830-86bf-b4e54b665cd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":55,"page_slug":"everlyn","prev_score":55,"reason":"None of the 8 countable claims were disputed or left unverifiable (0%); claim_findings[5], the price and all-time-high claim, was excluded because the CoinMarketCap source was blocked to the reviewer, which is a coverage limit and not a defect of the page. The listing facts (supply, 2025-10-06 date, product description, volatility warning) match the MEXC announcement, and the $15M funding and Mysten Labs involvement are corroborated by secondary coverage, with claim_findings[1] only partially supported because the 'led by' framing varies across sources and the page already says lists vary. No omission findings were reported and the subject status shows no contradiction with the page. The open high-priority gaps (team and audit, on-chain token analysis) are already disclosed on the page as unverified, so they suggest expanding the page and do not call for a penalty.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}