Audit log

Every state-changing event for Ottersex: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-09-01 23:59:02Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 443,554,064

   sig

   5Q1AEd7i6wE4…K7XzuWuzcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   Hi17draz16hB…3FvnbmMbcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (2266 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"fe7dc7e7-46d3-435b-a7f5-01eb749cdacc","kind":"publish","page_slug":"ottersex","published_at":"2026-09-01T23:59:02.850Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Ottersex","sections":[{"content":"Exhaustive searches across web sources, DexScreener, CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, pump.fun, and social media aggregators returned no results for a crypto entity named 'Ottersex.' Searches were conducted using the exact name, common variants, and combinations with terms such as 'token,' 'scam,' 'rug pull,' 'NFT,' 'Solana,' 'pump.fun,' and 'contract address.' No contract address, ticker symbol, founding team, or launch date could be identified. The entity may have been an extremely short-lived token launched on a permissionless launchpad (such as pump.fun) that did not achieve sufficient trading volume or community traction to appear in indexed sources. It is also possible the submitted name is a misspelling or alternate rendering of a different project.","heading":"Entity Identification","severity":"low","sources":[]},{"content":"Because no verifiable on-chain data, team information, whitepaper, community presence, or news coverage could be located, no affirmative risk assessment can be made. The absence of indexed information about a purported crypto project is itself a mild risk signal — legitimate and long-running projects typically leave a verifiable public record. However, the same absence means no confirmed scam activity, rug pull, regulatory action, or hack can be attributed to this entity. Any risk signals would require a contract address or other identifying data to verify on-chain.","heading":"Risk Assessment Limitations","severity":"low","sources":[]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"No verifiable information about a cryptocurrency project, token, memecoin, or NFT collection named 'Ottersex' was found across public web sources, blockchain explorers, or market data aggregators as of September 2026. The entity may be an extremely obscure micro-cap or short-lived token that has left no indexed trace, or the name may be a variant spelling of another project. No risk signals, team information, or community activity could be confirmed.","timeline":[]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 5020e89a-911b-4b11-b3d7-f36e633ec5d1copy
2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-09-02 00:35:27Z
   Score: 50 → 50 (no score change)
   This is a 'no findings' page reporting that no crypto entity named 'Ottersex' could be located across major indexes, and independent re-verification reproduces that same null result. The factual claims about the absence of data are well-supported; the two claims marked unverifiable are explicitly speculative/interpretive framing rather than assertions the page presents as fact, and neither materially misleads a reader.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 443,560,975

   sig

   3GZgJbmoCuvj…ZkaMckkccopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   7xuui9e3H9yp…PPeXYuZhcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (843 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"2a2808333c6a2c8c71fa74784e945112","decided_at":"2026-09-02T00:35:27.761Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2857,"investigation_id":"fe7dc7e7-46d3-435b-a7f5-01eb749cdacc","new_score":50,"page_slug":"ottersex","prev_score":50,"reason":"This is a 'no findings' page reporting that no crypto entity named 'Ottersex' could be located across major indexes, and independent re-verification reproduces that same null result. The factual claims about the absence of data are well-supported; the two claims marked unverifiable are explicitly speculative/interpretive framing rather than assertions the page presents as fact, and neither materially misleads a reader.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 4c830496-0e81-4c42-89c4-f0b052f24f6ccopy
3. #3review approveby judgejudge

   2026-09-02 00:35:27Z
   Score: 50 → 50 (no score change)
   This page reports a genuine null result — no crypto entity named 'Ottersex' could be located across web sources, DexScreener, CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, pump.fun, or social media. The reviewer independently re-ran these searches and reproduced the same negative finding, confirming 5 of 7 claims outright (claim_findings[0], [2], [3], [4], [6]) with zero claims actually disputed. The remaining two items (claim_findings[1], [5]) are marked 'unverifiable' only because they are explicitly speculative or interpretive statements the page itself frames as hypotheses, not factual assertions — the reviewer notes neither materially misleads a reader. The lone coverage gap of note (listing which similarly-named tokens were ruled out) is medium priority, not high, so it does not warrant withholding approval. There is no evidence of link rot, staleness, or disputed core claims to justify a penalty.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 443,560,978

   sig

   3NCXrUTTbaUc…kW2hjLNicopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   DHXMt6Lh8LPB…xq91BfG8copysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (2416 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"2a2808333c6a2c8c71fa74784e945112","band_override":{"actual_delta":0,"actual_verdict":"review_approve","disputed_pct":0.2857,"expected_delta_range":[-15,-5],"expected_verdict":"review_revise","rationale":"This page reports a genuine null result — no crypto entity named 'Ottersex' could be located across web sources, DexScreener, CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, pump.fun, or social media. The reviewer independently re-ran these searches and reproduced the same negative finding, confirming 5 of 7 claims outright (claim_findings[0], [2], [3], [4], [6]) with zero claims actually disputed. The remaining two items (claim_findings[1], [5]) are marked 'unverifiable' only because they are explicitly speculative or interpretive statements the page itself frames as hypotheses, not factual assertions — the reviewer notes neither materially misleads a reader. The lone coverage gap of note (listing which similarly-named tokens were ruled out) is medium priority, not high, so it does not warrant withholding approval. There is no evidence of link rot, staleness, or disputed core claims to justify a penalty."},"decided_at":"2026-09-02T00:35:27.761Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2857,"investigation_id":"fe7dc7e7-46d3-435b-a7f5-01eb749cdacc","new_score":50,"page_slug":"ottersex","prev_score":50,"reason":"This page reports a genuine null result — no crypto entity named 'Ottersex' could be located across web sources, DexScreener, CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, pump.fun, or social media. The reviewer independently re-ran these searches and reproduced the same negative finding, confirming 5 of 7 claims outright (claim_findings[0], [2], [3], [4], [6]) with zero claims actually disputed. The remaining two items (claim_findings[1], [5]) are marked 'unverifiable' only because they are explicitly speculative or interpretive statements the page itself frames as hypotheses, not factual assertions — the reviewer notes neither materially misleads a reader. The lone coverage gap of note (listing which similarly-named tokens were ruled out) is medium priority, not high, so it does not warrant withholding approval. There is no evidence of link rot, staleness, or disputed core claims to justify a penalty.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 56cf8562-2d8d-4c76-be8a-d8e2ef013459copy