Audit log

Every state-changing event for Morocoin / Berge Blockchain / Cirkor / AI Wealth Investment Club Network: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-06-02 21:25:17Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 423,890,534

   sig

   aAuJ8yedaasW…GqxfqEeQcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   2YHHv4fi2ARF…L8BfvwKKcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (28268 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"50a981f6-6057-4c68-b32b-150fd3b86197","kind":"publish","page_slug":"morocoin-berge-blockchain-cirkor-ai-wealth-investment-club-network","published_at":"2026-06-02T21:25:17.849Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Morocoin / Berge Blockchain / Cirkor / AI Wealth Investment Club Network","sections":[{"content":"On December 22, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Case No. 1:25-cv-04102) against all seven entities. The complaint was brought by the SEC's Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit (CETU), which was established in February 2025 to replace the prior Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit and specifically targets fraud involving artificial intelligence, emerging technologies, fake websites, and social media. The SEC charges Morocoin Tech Corp., Berge Blockchain Technology Co. Ltd., and Cirkor Inc. with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The investment clubs — AI Wealth Inc., Lane Wealth Inc., AI Investment Education Foundation Ltd. (AIIEF), and Zenith Asset Tech Foundation — are charged with violating Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC seeks permanent injunctions and civil penalties against all defendants, and disgorgement with prejudgment interest specifically against the three platform entities (Morocoin, Berge, and Cirkor). CETU chief Laura D'Allaird stated: 'Fraud is fraud, and we will vigorously pursue securities fraud' affecting retail investors. As of June 2026, no default judgment or final court order has been publicly confirmed; the case remains in early litigation.","heading":"SEC Enforcement Action","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Litigation Release LR-26453 — Morocoin Tech Corp. et al.","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26453"},{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Press Release 2025-144 — Three Purported Crypto Trading Platforms and Four Investment Clubs","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Complaint — Case No. 25-cv-04102 (PDF)","type":"court_filing","url":"https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2025/comp-pr2025-144.pdf"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Securities Enforcement Roundup December 2025 — Morgan Lewis","type":"research","url":"https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/01/securities-enforcement-roundup-december-2025"}]},{"content":"The alleged scheme, which ran from at least January 2024 through January 2025, follows the pattern known as 'pig butchering' (sha zhu pan), in which operators systematically build a target's trust before inducing large investments that are then stolen. The process unfolded in five stages according to the SEC complaint. First, the four investment clubs (AI Wealth, Lane Wealth, AIIEF, and Zenith) placed social media advertisements — some of which allegedly featured deepfake videos impersonating well-known financial professionals — to recruit prospective investors into private WhatsApp groups. Second, once inside the groups, victims encountered two recurring operator personas: a 'professor' who provided macroeconomic commentary and investment guidance, and an 'assistant' who handled daily member interactions. Both personas falsely claimed their trade recommendations derived from proprietary AI-generated signals. Fictitious group members posted manipulated screenshots purporting to show profitable trades and unrealistic earnings to further build credibility. Third, investors were directed to open accounts on one of three purported crypto trading platforms — Morocoin (h5.morocoin[.]top), Berge Blockchain (bergev[.]org), or Cirkor (cirkortrading[.]com) — which displayed realistic trading dashboards with fabricated account balances and real-time price data. In reality, no actual trading ever took place on any of the three platforms. Fourth, the platforms and clubs promoted fictitious 'Security Token Offerings': SCT tokens purportedly issued by 'SatCommTech,' HMB tokens purportedly issued by 'HumanBlock,' and NNET tokens purportedly linked to 'NeuralNet,' a company allegedly developing brain-computer interfaces. None of these companies existed. Fifth, when investors attempted to withdraw funds, operators demanded advance fees framed as 'taxes,' 'loan repayments,' or 'investigation fees,' and threatened three-year account freezes for non-compliance. In at least one documented instance, Morocoin notified investors in June 2024 of a fabricated SEC investigation, demanding payment of 'expedited withdrawal fees' to access their accounts.","heading":"Scheme Overview: Pig Butchering and AI-Themed Confidence Fraud","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Press Release 2025-144","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Complaint — Case No. 25-cv-04102 (PDF)","type":"court_filing","url":"https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2025/comp-pr2025-144.pdf"},{"credibility":2,"name":"How 'Professors' on WhatsApp Defrauded Investors of $14 Million — Finance Magnates","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/regulation/how-professors-on-whatsapp-defrauded-investors-of-14-million/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Filings Reveal the $14 Million Trap Inside WhatsApp Crypto Investment Clubs — CryptoSlate","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptoslate.com/sec-filings-reveal-the-14-million-trap-hiding-inside-exclusive-whatsapp-crypto-investment-clubs/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Sues Crypto Ring for $14 Million Fraud — The Hacker News","type":"news_article","url":"https://thehackernews.com/2025/12/sec-files-charges-over-14-million.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Fraudsters in $14M WhatsApp Crypto Scam — Wealth Management","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.wealthmanagement.com/regulation-compliance/sec-charges-whatsapp-group-operators-with-14m-crypto-scam"}]},{"content":"All three platforms were incorporated as legal entities in the United States but operated as fraudulent fronts with no genuine trading infrastructure. Morocoin Tech Corp. was registered in approximately December 2023 and operated the domain h5.morocoin[.]top. Berge Blockchain Technology Co., Ltd. was incorporated approximately June 2022 and operated bergev[.]org. Cirkor Inc. was the most recently formed, incorporated approximately May 2024, and operated cirkortrading[.]com. All three entities falsely claimed to hold government licenses and regulatory registrations — including alleged false claims of SEC registration, NFA membership, and FinCEN registration — and advertised '$150 million in insurance against third-party theft.' The platforms presented users with realistic trading dashboards displaying fabricated balances and simulated price data, but the complaint alleges no actual trades were ever executed on any platform. All three entities are registered in Washington or Colorado. The operator identities behind the platforms are not publicly named in the complaint; the SEC notes that funds were traced to individuals in China, Myanmar (Burma), Malaysia, and Hong Kong.","heading":"Platform Entities: Morocoin, Berge Blockchain, Cirkor","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Complaint — Case No. 25-cv-04102 (PDF)","type":"court_filing","url":"https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2025/comp-pr2025-144.pdf"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Fake Crypto Platforms, AI Investment Clubs in $14M Scam — The Record","type":"news_article","url":"https://therecord.media/sec-sues-crypto-firms-defrauding-investors-14-million"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Morocoin, Berge, Cirkor and 4 Investment Clubs — BitcoinSensus","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.bitcoinsensus.com/news/defi/sec-morocoin-berge-cirkor-and-4-investment-clubs-14m-crypto-scam"}]},{"content":"The four investment clubs served as the recruitment and trust-building arm of the alleged scheme. AI Wealth Inc. and Lane Wealth Inc. jointly promoted the SCT token STO purportedly from the nonexistent company SatCommTech, directing their members to open accounts on Morocoin and Berge. AI Investment Education Foundation Ltd. (AIIEF) and Zenith Asset Tech Foundation promoted the HMB token STO purportedly from the nonexistent company HumanBlock, funneling members toward Cirkor. An unnamed individual based in Beijing, China, allegedly paid for the registrations of AI Wealth, Lane Wealth, and Zenith. All four clubs were registered in Washington or Colorado. The clubs' operators are not identified by name in public filings; the SEC describes them as operating from China, Malaysia, and Hong Kong. The clubs collectively recruited victims through social media, including advertisements alleged to contain deepfake videos of prominent financial figures, and maintained the fraud's conversational infrastructure through the 'professor' and 'assistant' personas inside WhatsApp group chats.","heading":"WhatsApp Investment Clubs: AI Wealth, Lane Wealth, AIIEF, Zenith","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Press Release 2025-144","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Litigation Release LR-26453","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26453"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges WhatsApp Group Operators With $14M Crypto Scam — Yahoo Finance","type":"news_article","url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-charges-whatsapp-group-operators-180334526.html"}]},{"content":"The SEC complaint alleges the defendants misappropriated at least $14 million from U.S.-based retail investors over the course of the scheme. According to reporting derived from the complaint, of this total, approximately $7.4 million represented cryptocurrency losses affecting approximately 57 investors, and approximately $6.6 million represented fiat currency losses affecting approximately 26 investors. Funds were deposited by victims via wire transfers to designated domestic bank accounts or delivered as cash to couriers, and cryptocurrency was transferred to unhosted wallets controlled by the operators. The defendants then routed proceeds through at least 27 domestic bank accounts and cryptocurrency wallets, with fiat funds ultimately wired overseas to individuals in China, Myanmar, Malaysia, and Hong Kong. Documented individual investor losses include one Morocoin victim who made seven separate wire transfers totaling more than $1 million to accounts in China and Hong Kong, and one Cirkor victim who wired over $1.4 million to a bank in Indonesia. The multi-layered routing through overlapping domestic and foreign accounts is consistent with techniques commonly used in transnational organized crime operations to obscure the trail of misappropriated funds.","heading":"Financial Losses and Fund Routing","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Press Release 2025-144","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"credibility":2,"name":"How 'Professors' on WhatsApp Defrauded Investors of $14 Million — Finance Magnates","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/regulation/how-professors-on-whatsapp-defrauded-investors-of-14-million/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Fake Crypto Platforms, AI Investment Clubs in $14M Scam — The Record","type":"news_article","url":"https://therecord.media/sec-sues-crypto-firms-defrauding-investors-14-million"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges $14M Crypto Investment Scam — The Block","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/383702/us-sec-charges-14-million-crypto-scam"}]},{"content":"A distinctive element of the alleged scheme was the promotion of fabricated Security Token Offerings (STOs) tied to nonexistent companies, designed to solicit larger investment commitments from victims already engaged with the fake platforms. The AI Wealth and Lane Wealth clubs promoted an STO for a token called SCT, purportedly issued by a company named SatCommTech. The AIIEF and Zenith clubs promoted an STO for a token called HMB, purportedly issued by a company named HumanBlock. Separately, a fictitious entity called NeuralNet — described as developing brain-computer interfaces — was used to market NNET tokens. None of these three companies existed. The STOs were presented as IPO-equivalent investment opportunities. The SEC complaint charges the defendants with violating the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with these purported offerings. The McGuireWoods analysis published in February 2026 noted that the SEC's approach raises a 'Schrodinger's Asset' jurisdictional question about whether the tokens constituted securities for all investors or only for those who received specific profit representations, though this legal debate does not affect the underlying fraud allegations.","heading":"Fake Security Token Offerings and Fictitious Companies","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Complaint — Case No. 25-cv-04102 (PDF)","type":"court_filing","url":"https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2025/comp-pr2025-144.pdf"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Morocoin and Others — The Hacker News","type":"news_article","url":"https://thehackernews.com/2025/12/sec-files-charges-over-14-million.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC v. Morocoin and the Schrodinger's Asset Dilemma — Securities Docket / McGuireWoods","type":"research","url":"https://www.securitiesdocket.com/2026/02/27/sec-v-morocoin-and-the-schrodingers-asset-dilemma-mcguirewoods/"}]},{"content":"The scheme employed a second layer of fraud against victims who attempted to withdraw their funds. Rather than processing withdrawals, the operators demanded upfront payments variously described as taxes, loan repayments, investigation fees, or expedited processing fees. Victims who paid these advance fees did not receive their funds; instead, operators severed access to accounts entirely after extracting additional payments. In at least one documented instance in June 2024, Morocoin sent notifications to investors claiming the platform was under a fictitious SEC investigation and gave investors a 10-day window to withdraw funds — but only if they paid 'expedited withdrawal fees' from outside accounts. This tactic transformed the withdrawal attempt itself into a secondary extraction channel and is consistent with advance fee fraud patterns documented in broader pig-butchering enforcement actions.","heading":"Secondary Fraud: Advance Fee Demands","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Press Release 2025-144","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"credibility":2,"name":"How 'Professors' on WhatsApp Defrauded Investors of $14 Million — Finance Magnates","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/regulation/how-professors-on-whatsapp-defrauded-investors-of-14-million/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Fake Crypto Platforms, AI Investment Clubs in $14M Scam — The Record","type":"news_article","url":"https://therecord.media/sec-sues-crypto-firms-defrauding-investors-14-wealth-management"}]},{"content":"The SEC complaint and related reporting describe two uses of AI technology in the alleged scheme. First, social media advertisements allegedly featured deepfake videos impersonating recognized financial professionals to establish credibility for the investment clubs and platforms. Second, the 'professor' and 'assistant' personas inside the WhatsApp groups falsely claimed their trading recommendations were generated by proprietary AI systems. The AI branding — reflected in the names of entities such as AI Wealth Inc. and AI Investment Education Foundation Ltd. — was an explicit trust mechanism intended to align the scheme with investor interest in AI-driven financial products. The SEC's Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit specifically called out fraud committed using AI and machine learning as a CETU enforcement priority when the unit was announced in February 2025. The Morocoin case became one of the CETU's early publicly named actions targeting AI-themed investment fraud.","heading":"Use of Deepfakes and AI Branding","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Morocoin and Others — The Hacker News","type":"news_article","url":"https://thehackernews.com/2025/12/sec-files-charges-over-14-million.html"},{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Announces Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit — SEC Press Release 2025-42","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-42"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Fake Crypto Platforms — SC World","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.scworld.com/brief/multi-million-investment-scam-nets-sec-charges-against-crypto-firms-investment-clubs"}]},{"content":"The SEC complaint does not publicly name any individual defendants; all seven charged entities are corporations or foundations. Public reporting notes that funds were traced to individuals in China, Myanmar (Burma), Malaysia, and Hong Kong, and that an unnamed individual based in Beijing, China paid for the registrations of AI Wealth, Lane Wealth, and Zenith. The entities were registered in the states of Washington and Colorado despite having no apparent operations there. The absence of individually named defendants is notable and may reflect the transnational nature of the operation: multiple enforcement agencies have noted that pig-butchering schemes of this scale typically involve organized criminal networks, often based in Southeast Asia, that are difficult to extradite or identify fully through civil proceedings alone. No criminal charges had been publicly filed as of June 2026.","heading":"Operator Identities and Undisclosed Team","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Press Release 2025-144","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Crypto Fraud of Morocoin, Berge Blockchain and Cirkor — Jeffrey Pederson PC","type":"other","url":"https://www.jpedersonlaw.com/2025/12/30/morocoin/"}]},{"content":"The SEC v. Morocoin case was filed during a broader enforcement environment in which the SEC's Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit was specifically prioritizing AI-themed fraud and pig-butchering schemes. The FBI's 2024 Internet Crime Report documented pig-butchering and crypto investment fraud causing $5.8 billion in reported losses in the United States alone that year, reflecting the scale of the broader criminal ecosystem of which this alleged scheme is a part. The Morocoin case is significant as one of the first CETU enforcement actions after the unit was rebranded in February 2025, and it demonstrates that the SEC continued to pursue clear fraud cases against retail investors even as it wound down registration-based enforcement actions against established crypto exchanges such as Coinbase, Binance, and Ripple during the same period.","heading":"Broader Enforcement Context","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Announces Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit — SEC Press Release 2025-42","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-42"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC v. Morocoin and the Schrodinger's Asset Dilemma — Securities Docket","type":"research","url":"https://www.securitiesdocket.com/2026/02/27/sec-v-morocoin-and-the-schrodingers-asset-dilemma-mcguirewoods/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Crypto Enforcement Trends 2025 — Medium / Trent V. Bolar","type":"research","url":"https://medium.com/@trentice.bolar/crypto-enforcement-trends-2025-navigating-deregulation-fraud-priorities-and-risk-mitigation-e6e75800e66d"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Litigation Release LR-26453","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26453"},{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Press Release 2025-144","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Complaint — Case No. 25-cv-04102 (PDF)","type":"court_filing","url":"https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2025/comp-pr2025-144.pdf"},{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Announces Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit — Press Release 2025-42","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-42"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Sues Crypto Firms for Defrauding Investors Out of $14 Million — The Record (Recorded Future News)","type":"news_article","url":"https://therecord.media/sec-sues-crypto-firms-defrauding-investors-14-million"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges $14 Million Crypto Investment Scam — The Block","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/383702/us-sec-charges-14-million-crypto-scam"},{"credibility":2,"name":"How 'Professors' on WhatsApp Defrauded Investors of $14 Million — Finance Magnates","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/regulation/how-professors-on-whatsapp-defrauded-investors-of-14-million/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Fraudsters in $14M WhatsApp Crypto Scam — Wealth Management","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.wealthmanagement.com/regulation-compliance/sec-charges-whatsapp-group-operators-with-14m-crypto-scam"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Files Charges Over $14 Million Crypto Scam Using Fake AI-Themed Investment Tips — The Hacker News","type":"news_article","url":"https://thehackernews.com/2025/12/sec-files-charges-over-14-million.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Filings Reveal the $14 Million Trap Inside WhatsApp Crypto Investment Clubs — CryptoSlate","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptoslate.com/sec-filings-reveal-the-14-million-trap-hiding-inside-exclusive-whatsapp-crypto-investment-clubs/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Fake Crypto Platforms, AI Investment Clubs in $14M Scam — Yahoo Finance / CryptoNews","type":"news_article","url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-charges-fake-crypto-platforms-120656665.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC Charges Seven Groups in Alleged Crypto Confidence Scam — Investment Executive","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.investmentexecutive.com/from-the-regulators/sec-charges-seven-groups-in-alleged-crypto-confidence-scam/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Multi-Million Investment Scam Nets SEC Charges — SC World","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.scworld.com/brief/multi-million-investment-scam-nets-sec-charges-against-crypto-firms-investment-clubs"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SEC v. Morocoin and the Schrodinger's Asset Dilemma — Securities Docket / McGuireWoods","type":"research","url":"https://www.securitiesdocket.com/2026/02/27/sec-v-morocoin-and-the-schrodingers-asset-dilemma-mcguirewoods/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Securities Enforcement Roundup December 2025 — Morgan Lewis","type":"research","url":"https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/01/securities-enforcement-roundup-december-2025"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Crypto Fraud of Morocoin, Berge Blockchain and Cirkor — Jeffrey Pederson PC","type":"other","url":"https://www.jpedersonlaw.com/2025/12/30/morocoin/"}],"summary":"Morocoin Tech Corp., Berge Blockchain Technology Co. Ltd., Cirkor Inc., AI Wealth Inc., Lane Wealth Inc., AI Investment Education Foundation Ltd., and Zenith Asset Tech Foundation are seven entities charged by the SEC on December 22, 2025 (Case No. 1:25-cv-04102, D. Colo.) with defrauding at least $14 million from U.S. retail investors in a coordinated pig-butchering and AI-themed investment confidence scheme operating from January 2024 through January 2025. The scheme used WhatsApp-based fake investment clubs, deepfake social media advertisements, fabricated AI-generated trading signals, and counterfeit trading platforms that conducted no actual trading, followed by advance fee demands to further extract funds from victims attempting withdrawals.","timeline":[{"date":"2022-06","event":"Berge Blockchain Technology Co., Ltd. incorporated (approximately); domain bergev[.]org established","source":"The Hacker News / SEC complaint","source_url":"https://thehackernews.com/2025/12/sec-files-charges-over-14-million.html"},{"date":"2023-12","event":"Morocoin Tech Corp. incorporated (approximately); domain h5.morocoin[.]top established","source":"The Hacker News / SEC complaint","source_url":"https://thehackernews.com/2025/12/sec-files-charges-over-14-million.html"},{"date":"2024-01","event":"Scheme operational start: WhatsApp investment clubs begin recruiting victims via social media; AI Wealth, Lane Wealth, AIIEF, and Zenith begin operating","source":"SEC Press Release 2025-144","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"date":"2024-05","event":"Cirkor Inc. incorporated (approximately); domain cirkortrading[.]com established","source":"The Hacker News / SEC complaint","source_url":"https://thehackernews.com/2025/12/sec-files-charges-over-14-million.html"},{"date":"2024-06","event":"Morocoin notifies investors of a fabricated SEC investigation, demanding 'expedited withdrawal fees' within 10 days or face three-year account freeze","source":"Finance Magnates","source_url":"https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/regulation/how-professors-on-whatsapp-defrauded-investors-of-14-million/"},{"date":"2025-01","event":"Scheme operational end: operations across all seven entities cease approximately January 2025","source":"SEC Press Release 2025-144","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"date":"2025-02-20","event":"SEC launches Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit (CETU), which will bring the Morocoin case; CETU replaces the prior Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit","source":"SEC Press Release 2025-42","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-42"},{"date":"2025-12-22","event":"SEC files complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Case No. 1:25-cv-04102) against all seven entities, alleging at least $14 million in investor losses","source":"SEC Litigation Release LR-26453","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26453"},{"date":"2025-12-23","event":"SEC issues press release 2025-144 announcing charges; reports indicate litigation release LR-26453 issued same period","source":"SEC Press Release 2025-144","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-144-sec-charges-three-purported-crypto-asset-trading-platforms-four-investment-clubs-scheme-targeted"},{"date":"2026-02-27","event":"McGuireWoods publishes legal analysis of SEC v. Morocoin raising jurisdictional 'Schrodinger's Asset' question about whether tokens were securities for all investors","source":"Securities Docket / McGuireWoods","source_url":"https://www.securitiesdocket.com/2026/02/27/sec-v-morocoin-and-the-schrodingers-asset-dilemma-mcguirewoods/"}]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision d143ed7f-503c-4234-9c49-fb897b76f369copy