Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426295702
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-13T23:09:06.684Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- GqnqZNEK2qHBYTgE5NwWLAzacQSw38Yitd6xFwReMLqY
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1242 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-13T23:09:06.592Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"50a981f6-6057-4c68-b32b-150fd3b86197","new_score":0,"page_slug":"morocoin-berge-blockchain-cirkor-ai-wealth-investment-club-network","prev_score":0,"reason":"The page is well-sourced and factually accurate on the core claims: the seven named defendants, case number, district, filing date, $14 million alleged loss, statutory charges, scheme mechanics, fund routing geography, fictitious STO companies, and CETU context are all independently confirmed by multiple credible secondary sources. The two unverifiable findings — specific investor count breakdowns (57 crypto / 26 fiat) and the detailed regulatory impersonation claims ($150M insurance, NFA/FinCEN false registration) — stem from the SEC complaint PDF being inaccessible to direct fetch, not from contradicting evidence. The three partially supported claims involve minor truncation of a direct quote, ambiguity about Myanmar as operator versus routing geography, and a non-falsified but unconfirmable 'first CETU action' characterization.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}