Skip to main content
Sign in

Audit log

Every state-changing event for FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.

  1. #1publishby system:backfill
    2026-05-31 17:50:49Z
    Score: ?? (no score change)
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 423,423,078
    sig
    haDtA87ffob4…ixhdjeyUexplorer ↗
    hash
    E3eSfxsBmn9U…mG6VCBkqsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (14552 B) ▸
    {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"c7da8465-6607-45d5-a0b8-37ba48362539","kind":"publish","page_slug":"fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8","published_at":"2026-05-31T17:50:49.710Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8","sections":[{"content":"The address FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8 is a Solana Program Library (SPL) token mint — not a wallet. It is the on-chain mint account for Dasha, the platform token of vvaifu.fun, an AI agent launchpad built on the Solana blockchain. The token uses the ticker symbol VVAIFU and is listed on aggregators including CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, DEX Screener, and Moralis. Primary trading occurs on the Raydium DEX with the VVAIFU/SOL pair. The token is also bridged to Polygon (ERC-20 contract 0xd567442c7226a7cdc526995929a843d0a5bd0373) and Base (0xb7e153e1f899831a2c28cf2b92308ef82d8f5a7b), though those deployments show very low activity.","heading":"Address Classification","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Solscan account page for FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8","type":"on_chain","url":"https://solscan.io/account/FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8"},{"credibility":2,"name":"DEX Screener — VVAIFU/SOL pair","type":"on_chain","url":"https://dexscreener.com/solana/fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinGecko — Dasha (VVAIFU) token page","type":"research","url":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/dasha"}]},{"content":"vvaifu.fun describes itself as the first AI agent launchpad on Solana, enabling users to create and deploy autonomous AI agents through a no-code interface. Agents can be programmed to post autonomously to Twitter, Discord, Telegram, and TikTok, and can hold and transact on-chain assets. The platform launched on October 19, 2024, via Pump.fun's bonding curve infrastructure. To create an agent, users must spend a minimum of SOL plus a quantity of VVAIFU tokens; those VVAIFU tokens are burned, introducing a deflationary mechanism. Dasha is described as the first AI agent launched on the platform itself, and its associated token (FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8) serves as the platform's native currency. The project positions itself alongside contemporaries such as Virtuals Protocol and ai16z in the AI agent token narrative that emerged in late 2024.","heading":"Project Overview: vvaifu.fun","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"IQ.wiki — vvaifu.fun project page","type":"research","url":"https://iq.wiki/wiki/vvaifufun"},{"credibility":3,"name":"web3researchglobal.com — vvaifu.fun analysis","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.web3researchglobal.com/p/vvaifufun"},{"credibility":2,"name":"gate.com — What is vvaifu.fun?","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.gate.com/learn/articles/what-is-vvaifu-fun-all-you-need-to-know-about-vvaifu/5047"}]},{"content":"The VVAIFU token launched on October 19, 2024, recording over $9 million in trading volume on its first day. The token saw a dramatic surge in November 2024: between November 16 and November 19, 2024, the price rose approximately 6,500%, from roughly $0.003 to an all-time high of approximately $0.21. This move was attributed in part to the launch of the Eliza AI agent on the platform, which attracted support from the ai16z decentralized AI fund and generated widespread speculative interest in the AI agent token narrative. Following the ATH, the token entered a sustained downtrend. By early April 2026, VVAIFU hit an all-time low of approximately $0.0001945. As of late May 2026, the token trades around $0.00023–$0.00026, representing a decline of roughly 99.9% from its November 2024 peak. Daily trading volume on the primary Raydium pair has fallen to under $2,000, and market capitalization stands below $300,000 USD. Circulating supply is approximately 993 million tokens, representing nearly the entire maximum supply of approximately 1 billion tokens.","heading":"Price History and Market Performance","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinGecko — Dasha price history","type":"research","url":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/dasha"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinMarketCap — Dasha (VVAIFU)","type":"research","url":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dasha/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinLore — Dasha price history","type":"research","url":"https://www.coinlore.com/coin/dasha"}]},{"content":"No named founders or team members have been publicly identified in association with vvaifu.fun. The primary public-facing identity for the project is the X (Twitter) account @vvaifudotfun and the handle referenced in early community coverage. RootData lists a 'Co-Founder' entry for the project but does not provide a name or verifiable identity. IQ.wiki and other aggregators do not identify any team members. The platform's documentation site (docs.vvaifu.fun) and its social channels do not disclose team composition. This degree of anonymity is a recognized risk factor in the crypto space, as it limits accountability and hinders independent verification of developer capabilities or intent.","heading":"Team Identity and Transparency","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"vvaifu.fun — official X account","type":"official","url":"https://x.com/vvaifudotfun"},{"credibility":2,"name":"IQ.wiki — vvaifu.fun","type":"research","url":"https://iq.wiki/wiki/vvaifufun"}]},{"content":"CoinMarketCap displays a CertiK security score of 3.5 out of 10 for the VVAIFU token. No formal, independently published smart contract audit report has been identified in publicly available sources. The token was distributed via a 100% fair launch on Pump.fun with no team allocation or vesting schedule disclosed. Approximately 99.97% of liquidity in the primary Raydium pool is reportedly locked. The CertiK score of 3.5/10 is considered low and is consistent with a project that has not undergone comprehensive security review. No known exploits, hacks, or fund drainage events have been reported against the vvaifu.fun platform or the VVAIFU token contract.","heading":"Security and Audit Status","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinMarketCap — Dasha (VVAIFU), CertiK score notation","type":"research","url":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dasha/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"web3researchglobal.com — vvaifu.fun tokenomics","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.web3researchglobal.com/p/vvaifufun"}]},{"content":"The VVAIFU token was launched via a 100% fair launch on the Pump.fun bonding curve mechanism on October 19, 2024, with no pre-sale, no team allocation, and no vesting cliff disclosed. Maximum supply is approximately 999.9 million tokens. Circulating supply as of mid-2026 is approximately 993 million tokens, indicating minimal ongoing burn activity relative to total supply. The deflationary burn mechanism requires VVAIFU tokens to be burned each time a new AI agent is launched or new capabilities are unlocked on the platform. Platform activity statistics cited by the @vvaifudotfun account in early 2025 claimed over 400 AI agents launched and over 3 million VVAIFU tokens burned, though these figures are unverified and sourced from the project's own social media. Primary trading pair liquidity is approximately $126,000 with approximately 23,100 token holders on-chain.","heading":"Tokenomics and Distribution","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"GeckoTerminal — VVAIFU/SOL pool on Raydium","type":"on_chain","url":"https://www.geckoterminal.com/solana/pools/9UMuN94bbuH53F4PTVWDYZoQjsJ3zgEx2j2vtT5Rbo1x"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinMarketCap — Dasha supply data","type":"research","url":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dasha/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"web3researchglobal.com — vvaifu.fun fair launch details","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.web3researchglobal.com/p/vvaifufun"}]},{"content":"No regulatory actions, enforcement orders, or legal proceedings involving vvaifu.fun or the VVAIFU/Dasha token have been identified in available sources. The token does not appear on OFAC sanctions lists or in SEC enforcement records. As of the date of this investigation, no court filings or government agency actions related to this address or its associated project have been found.","heading":"Regulatory and Legal Status","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"SEC Enforcement Results FY2025","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026-34"}]},{"content":"The vvaifu.fun website and documentation remain accessible as of mid-2026. The @vvaifudotfun X account shows activity through at least early 2025. Daily trading volume for the VVAIFU/SOL pair on Raydium has declined to under $2,000, which is consistent with a project operating in a post-hype period with significantly reduced market interest. The token continues to be listed on CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, and Solflare. There is no publicly available evidence of a formal project shutdown, developer abandonment announcement, or migration to a successor contract. The platform's AI agent narrative benefited significantly from the broader AI agent token boom of late 2024 (involving contemporaries such as Virtuals Protocol and ai16z), and the subsequent market-wide correction in that sector correlates with VVAIFU's price decline.","heading":"Platform Activity and Current Status","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Solflare — VVAIFU price page","type":"on_chain","url":"https://www.solflare.com/prices/dasha/FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinGecko — Dasha (VVAIFU)","type":"research","url":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/dasha"},{"credibility":2,"name":"DexView — Dasha/Wrapped SOL on RaydiumAMM","type":"on_chain","url":"https://www.dexview.com/solana/FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Solscan — account FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8","type":"on_chain","url":"https://solscan.io/account/FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinGecko — Dasha (VVAIFU)","type":"research","url":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/dasha"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinMarketCap — Dasha (VVAIFU)","type":"research","url":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dasha/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"DEX Screener — VVAIFU/SOL","type":"on_chain","url":"https://dexscreener.com/solana/fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8"},{"credibility":2,"name":"GeckoTerminal — VVAIFU/SOL pool on Raydium","type":"on_chain","url":"https://www.geckoterminal.com/solana/pools/9UMuN94bbuH53F4PTVWDYZoQjsJ3zgEx2j2vtT5Rbo1x"},{"credibility":2,"name":"IQ.wiki — vvaifu.fun project page","type":"research","url":"https://iq.wiki/wiki/vvaifufun"},{"credibility":3,"name":"web3researchglobal.com — vvaifu.fun deep dive","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.web3researchglobal.com/p/vvaifufun"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinLore — Dasha price history","type":"research","url":"https://www.coinlore.com/coin/dasha"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Solflare — Dasha/VVAIFU price","type":"on_chain","url":"https://www.solflare.com/prices/dasha/FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"OKX Web3 — VVAIFU token page","type":"research","url":"https://web3.okx.com/token/solana/FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinPaprika — Dasha (VVAIFU)","type":"research","url":"https://coinpaprika.com/coin/vvaifu-dasha/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Moralis — Dasha on-chain metrics","type":"on_chain","url":"https://moralis.com/chain/solana/token/price/dasha-2"},{"credibility":2,"name":"DexView — Dasha/Wrapped SOL RaydiumAMM","type":"on_chain","url":"https://www.dexview.com/solana/FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8"},{"credibility":2,"name":"vvaifu.fun official documentation","type":"official","url":"https://docs.vvaifu.fun/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"vvaifu.fun official X account (@vvaifudotfun)","type":"official","url":"https://x.com/vvaifudotfun"},{"credibility":2,"name":"PolygonScan — Dasha ERC-20 token tracker","type":"on_chain","url":"https://polygonscan.com/token/0xd567442c7226a7cdc526995929a843d0a5bd0373"}],"summary":"The Solana address FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8 is the token mint for Dasha (ticker: VVAIFU), the native token of vvaifu.fun — a no-code AI agent launchpad on Solana launched via Pump.fun on October 19, 2024. The token reached an all-time high of approximately $0.21 in November 2024, driven by speculative hype around the AI agent narrative, but has since collapsed approximately 99.9% to under $0.0003 as of mid-2026. The team behind vvaifu.fun operates pseudonymously, no formal audits have been disclosed, and CoinMarketCap lists a CertiK security score of 3.5 out of 10.","timeline":[{"date":"2024-10-18","event":"VVAIFU token launches on Pump.fun bonding curve; records over $9 million in first-day trading volume.","source":"web3researchglobal.com","source_url":"https://www.web3researchglobal.com/p/vvaifufun"},{"date":"2024-10-19","event":"vvaifu.fun platform goes live as the first AI agent launchpad on Solana.","source":"IQ.wiki","source_url":"https://iq.wiki/wiki/vvaifufun"},{"date":"2024-11-16","event":"VVAIFU price surges approximately 800% in a single day, beginning a multi-day rally attributed to the launch of the Eliza AI agent and support from ai16z.","source":"99Bitcoins","source_url":"https://99bitcoins.com/news/ai-agent-launchpad-are-pumping-virtuals-and-vvaifu-pump-is-arata-is-next/"},{"date":"2024-11-19","event":"VVAIFU reaches all-time high of approximately $0.21, with market cap briefly exceeding $200 million.","source":"CoinGecko","source_url":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/dasha"},{"date":"2025-01-01","event":"Token enters 2025 trading near $0.126, beginning a sustained decline throughout the year; down approximately 99.7% from ATH by year end.","source":"CoinLore","source_url":"https://www.coinlore.com/coin/dasha"},{"date":"2026-04-02","event":"VVAIFU hits all-time low of approximately $0.0001945.","source":"CoinGecko","source_url":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/dasha"},{"date":"2026-05-31","event":"Token trades at approximately $0.00023–$0.00026, roughly 99.9% below ATH; daily volume under $2,000; market cap approximately $232,000–$259,000.","source":"CoinGecko / CoinMarketCap","source_url":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dasha/"}]},"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 0f5cd8cf-771b-4287-aaad-7e1517f010f5
  2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-06-02 16:20:06Z
    Score: 2828 (no score change)
    The investigation is broadly accurate on the core facts: address classification, platform description, price history trajectory, fair launch structure, and team anonymity are all well-supported. The most significant error is the CertiK score scale misrepresentation (the score is 3.5 out of 5 stars / 69.20 out of 100, not 3.5 out of 10). The ATL claim has been superseded by continued price decline (new ATL set June 2, 2026), and the token launch date conflates October 18 (Pump.fun debut) with October 19 (platform launch). The Base ERC-20 bridge contract shows anomalous supply discrepancy warranting closer scrutiny.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 423,844,508
    sig
    5rvtLkjG61T3…VUqQNsVkexplorer ↗
    hash
    A3PJ9Egmcag6…XDQnB6u9sha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1001 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-02T16:20:06.769Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"c7da8465-6607-45d5-a0b8-37ba48362539","new_score":28,"page_slug":"fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8","prev_score":28,"reason":"The investigation is broadly accurate on the core facts: address classification, platform description, price history trajectory, fair launch structure, and team anonymity are all well-supported. The most significant error is the CertiK score scale misrepresentation (the score is 3.5 out of 5 stars / 69.20 out of 100, not 3.5 out of 10). The ATL claim has been superseded by continued price decline (new ATL set June 2, 2026), and the token launch date conflates October 18 (Pump.fun debut) with October 19 (platform launch). The Base ERC-20 bridge contract shows anomalous supply discrepancy warranting closer scrutiny.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 13b6acb3-c094-4df2-9e98-b8e015b27aec
  3. #3review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-06-02 16:20:06Z
    Score: 2818 (-10)
    The reviewer confirmed 16 of 28 claims outright and found 7 partially supported, leaving 3 disputed and 1 unverifiable out of 28 total (14% disputed). The page's core facts — address classification, platform description, price trajectory, fair launch structure, and team anonymity — are all well-supported. The most significant error, appearing twice (claim_findings[4] and claim_findings[16]), is that the CertiK security score is described as '3.5 out of 10' when the actual scale is 5 stars (3.5/5) on CoinMarketCap and 69.20/100 on CertiK Skynet directly; the directional conclusion is correct but the numeric framing misrepresents both display systems. The April 2026 all-time-low claim (claim_findings[14] and timeline[5]) is stale: the price has continued declining and a new ATL of $0.0001899 was recorded on June 2, 2026. One cited source (CoinLore, timeline[4]) returned 404. A high-priority coverage gap on the CertiK scale error reinforces the need for targeted revision, but no core fraud or safety allegation is in dispute.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 423,844,512
    sig
    2g6kHBx81pnH…TXko9eFnexplorer ↗
    hash
    3cHfiX4HGVyA…YHt8jsKksha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1423 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-02T16:20:06.769Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"c7da8465-6607-45d5-a0b8-37ba48362539","new_score":18,"page_slug":"fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8","prev_score":28,"reason":"The reviewer confirmed 16 of 28 claims outright and found 7 partially supported, leaving 3 disputed and 1 unverifiable out of 28 total (14% disputed). The page's core facts — address classification, platform description, price trajectory, fair launch structure, and team anonymity — are all well-supported. The most significant error, appearing twice (claim_findings[4] and claim_findings[16]), is that the CertiK security score is described as '3.5 out of 10' when the actual scale is 5 stars (3.5/5) on CoinMarketCap and 69.20/100 on CertiK Skynet directly; the directional conclusion is correct but the numeric framing misrepresents both display systems. The April 2026 all-time-low claim (claim_findings[14] and timeline[5]) is stale: the price has continued declining and a new ATL of $0.0001899 was recorded on June 2, 2026. One cited source (CoinLore, timeline[4]) returned 404. A high-priority coverage gap on the CertiK scale error reinforces the need for targeted revision, but no core fraud or safety allegation is in dispute.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 00b18a9d-4a93-4e1c-a751-daa49ced70a3
  4. #4reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-06-02 18:51:18Z
    Score: 1818 (no score change)
    The investigation page is broadly accurate on core factual claims: token identity, launch platform, price surge timing and magnitude, ATH price and date, current price and market cap, liquidity lock percentage, CertiK score, and team anonymity are all confirmed by independent sources. The two disputed claims both relate to the all-time low: CoinMarketCap records the historical ATL as $0.0000214 from October 20, 2024 — approximately 9x lower than the stated $0.0001945 on April 2, 2026 — and CoinGecko's own ATL has since fallen below the stated figure. One citation (CoinLore) is link-rotted, and the SEC FY2025 press release is misapplied as evidence of absence of regulatory action against this specific entity.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 423,867,343
    sig
    5EhvZdbT9Chz…yeHQPcJTexplorer ↗
    hash
    4u4t8Vt2kuKu…6AjY7V6Jsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1097 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-02T18:51:18.834Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"c7da8465-6607-45d5-a0b8-37ba48362539","new_score":18,"page_slug":"fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8","prev_score":18,"reason":"The investigation page is broadly accurate on core factual claims: token identity, launch platform, price surge timing and magnitude, ATH price and date, current price and market cap, liquidity lock percentage, CertiK score, and team anonymity are all confirmed by independent sources. The two disputed claims both relate to the all-time low: CoinMarketCap records the historical ATL as $0.0000214 from October 20, 2024 — approximately 9x lower than the stated $0.0001945 on April 2, 2026 — and CoinGecko's own ATL has since fallen below the stated figure. One citation (CoinLore) is link-rotted, and the SEC FY2025 press release is misapplied as evidence of absence of regulatory action against this specific entity.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 0f2d1607-e9ed-432a-9f29-4fc32701aae1
  5. #5review approveby judgejudge
    2026-06-02 18:51:19Z
    Score: 1813 (-5)
    25 of 32 claims are fully confirmed by Tier 2 sources, placing the disputed rate at 6.2% — within the approval band. Both disputed claims (claim_findings[13] and claim_findings[24]) target the same underlying fact: the stated all-time low of $0.0001945 on April 2, 2026. CoinMarketCap records a historical ATL of $0.0000214 from October 2024, approximately 9x lower, and CoinGecko's own ATL has since fallen below the stated figure. This is a factual error in a secondary price statistic but does not affect the page's core conclusions about entity identity, risk profile, or the ~99.9% decline narrative. A minor score adjustment reflects the ATL inaccuracy and the misapplied SEC source (claim_findings[22]), which uses a general FY2025 enforcement summary as evidence of regulatory absence rather than a direct OFAC or SEC entity search. Two high-priority coverage gaps — holder concentration analysis and current platform operational status — are noted for future expansion but do not support denial.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 423,867,347
    sig
    WNoFTJJHmDUY…cmq4XNWZexplorer ↗
    hash
    BY6kMHiBeGma…41wtDsYcsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1390 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-02T18:51:18.834Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"c7da8465-6607-45d5-a0b8-37ba48362539","new_score":13,"page_slug":"fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8","prev_score":18,"reason":"25 of 32 claims are fully confirmed by Tier 2 sources, placing the disputed rate at 6.2% — within the approval band. Both disputed claims (claim_findings[13] and claim_findings[24]) target the same underlying fact: the stated all-time low of $0.0001945 on April 2, 2026. CoinMarketCap records a historical ATL of $0.0000214 from October 2024, approximately 9x lower, and CoinGecko's own ATL has since fallen below the stated figure. This is a factual error in a secondary price statistic but does not affect the page's core conclusions about entity identity, risk profile, or the ~99.9% decline narrative. A minor score adjustment reflects the ATL inaccuracy and the misapplied SEC source (claim_findings[22]), which uses a general FY2025 enforcement summary as evidence of regulatory absence rather than a direct OFAC or SEC entity search. Two high-priority coverage gaps — holder concentration analysis and current platform operational status — are noted for future expansion but do not support denial.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 235d71b5-f54c-4bce-964f-141334c32044
  6. #6reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-06-03 14:35:07Z
    Score: 1313 (no score change)
    The investigation page for FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8 (Dasha/VVAIFU) is broadly accurate on core claims including token identity, ATH, current price decline, CertiK score, fair launch mechanics, and team anonymity. The most significant accuracy issue is that the page overstates the ai16z relationship as 'support' when ai16z subsequently disavowed the Eliza token that drove the November 2024 rally — this context materially affects how the price catalyst is characterized. Two cited URLs are non-functional (CoinLore 404, SEC press release 403), and the claimed April 2026 ATL date is inconsistent with CoinGecko data showing a more recent ATL in June 2026. The Base chain ERC-20 deployment appears potentially unofficial and is not clearly identified as such.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 424,045,784
    sig
    apcvNi61KwGA…w6egmer4explorer ↗
    hash
    5qiMqPnvkHJN…RHLtqgnUsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1160 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-03T14:35:07.323Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"c7da8465-6607-45d5-a0b8-37ba48362539","new_score":13,"page_slug":"fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8","prev_score":13,"reason":"The investigation page for FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8 (Dasha/VVAIFU) is broadly accurate on core claims including token identity, ATH, current price decline, CertiK score, fair launch mechanics, and team anonymity. The most significant accuracy issue is that the page overstates the ai16z relationship as 'support' when ai16z subsequently disavowed the Eliza token that drove the November 2024 rally — this context materially affects how the price catalyst is characterized. Two cited URLs are non-functional (CoinLore 404, SEC press release 403), and the claimed April 2026 ATL date is inconsistent with CoinGecko data showing a more recent ATL in June 2026. The Base chain ERC-20 deployment appears potentially unofficial and is not clearly identified as such.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 82697069-8003-4567-aed0-2142e76be2da
  7. #7review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-06-03 14:35:07Z
    Score: 133 (-10)
    The page is broadly accurate on all core claims — token identity, ATH, current price collapse, fair launch mechanics, CertiK score, and team anonymity are all confirmed by Tier 1 sources. No claims carry a 'disputed' verdict. However, claim_findings[13] identifies a material framing error: the page attributes the November 2024 price surge partly to 'support from the ai16z decentralized AI fund,' when ai16z partner Shaw subsequently and explicitly disavowed the Eliza token launched on vvaifu.fun and launched a competing token. This overstated affiliation is the highest-severity accuracy issue and warrants correction. Two citations are also non-functional: the CoinLore price history page (claim_findings[29], 404 error) and the SEC press release cited in the regulatory section (claim_findings[26], 403 error); neither undermines the underlying claims, but dead links weaken the evidentiary record. The claimed April 2026 ATL date (claim_findings[14]) is unverifiable and appears to have since been superseded by a lower June 2026 ATL.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 424,045,789
    sig
    421ZmAVDQ7Mm…diz3yjwZexplorer ↗
    hash
    oF9MFi53rnMS…Gzms58b7sha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1427 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-03T14:35:07.323Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"c7da8465-6607-45d5-a0b8-37ba48362539","new_score":3,"page_slug":"fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8","prev_score":13,"reason":"The page is broadly accurate on all core claims — token identity, ATH, current price collapse, fair launch mechanics, CertiK score, and team anonymity are all confirmed by Tier 1 sources. No claims carry a 'disputed' verdict. However, claim_findings[13] identifies a material framing error: the page attributes the November 2024 price surge partly to 'support from the ai16z decentralized AI fund,' when ai16z partner Shaw subsequently and explicitly disavowed the Eliza token launched on vvaifu.fun and launched a competing token. This overstated affiliation is the highest-severity accuracy issue and warrants correction. Two citations are also non-functional: the CoinLore price history page (claim_findings[29], 404 error) and the SEC press release cited in the regulatory section (claim_findings[26], 403 error); neither undermines the underlying claims, but dead links weaken the evidentiary record. The claimed April 2026 ATL date (claim_findings[14]) is unverifiable and appears to have since been superseded by a lower June 2026 ATL.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":7,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 3cdca2f3-1cd9-4fb0-aa97-4c8539d9cd96
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.