Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · FQ1tyso61AH1tzodyJfSwmzsD3GToybbRNoZxUBz21p8
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 28 → 18 (-10)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423844512
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-02T16:20:06.996Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 3cHfiX4HGVyAfBdm59UBT29QhgkKw7gGqkyMYHt8jsKk
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1423 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-02T16:20:06.769Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"c7da8465-6607-45d5-a0b8-37ba48362539","new_score":18,"page_slug":"fq1tyso61ah1tzodyjfswmzsd3gtoybbrnozxubz21p8","prev_score":28,"reason":"The reviewer confirmed 16 of 28 claims outright and found 7 partially supported, leaving 3 disputed and 1 unverifiable out of 28 total (14% disputed). The page's core facts — address classification, platform description, price trajectory, fair launch structure, and team anonymity — are all well-supported. The most significant error, appearing twice (claim_findings[4] and claim_findings[16]), is that the CertiK security score is described as '3.5 out of 10' when the actual scale is 5 stars (3.5/5) on CoinMarketCap and 69.20/100 on CertiK Skynet directly; the directional conclusion is correct but the numeric framing misrepresents both display systems. The April 2026 all-time-low claim (claim_findings[14] and timeline[5]) is stale: the price has continued declining and a new ATL of $0.0001899 was recorded on June 2, 2026. One cited source (CoinLore, timeline[4]) returned 404. A high-priority coverage gap on the CertiK scale error reinforces the need for targeted revision, but no core fraud or safety allegation is in dispute.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}