← DarkSword (iOS Safari zero-click exploit chain targeting crypto wallets)4 decisions on this page
Audit log
Every state-changing event for DarkSword (iOS Safari zero-click exploit chain targeting crypto wallets): moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.
- #1reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-10-27 10:59:42ZScore: 3 → 3 (no score change)The core technical facts hold: the six CVEs, the March 2026 GTIG disclosure, activity since November 2025, and the April 1 release of iOS 18.7.7. The September SlowMist claims are hedged appropriately, and no confirmed theft is documented. Problems found: the named apps (Coinbase, Binance, Ledger, MetaMask) come from Lookout, not the cited Hacker News and GTIG pages. The actor attributions are wrongly described as resting on a single research note, since they come from GTIG. The stated reason for the 18.7.7 backport contradicts TechCrunch, and the late-March limited rollout is not in that article. The SlowMist lure-domain details could not be checked because the advisory was blocked. The page omits the October 2026 Censys report.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,045,598
- sig
2sV7xnoracvP…ugpQKfUkexplorer ↗- hash
6xH7bLSL4qQh…XHB5h7AYsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1683 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"4ceb56d69b669091bcd8d2dff3521cf0","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T10:59:42.474Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2222,"findings_hash":"58q69eFSXreTrM9rUfC4ndyXtZVwoe6gJxz1rVgxr6VN","investigation_id":"398c8634-edab-4f6a-8f3d-ca0abc756f59","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":3,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"f0a1d8d533014058172f69f0efc855f88ff54a8f7dfea3f9549bea4db17b9970","page_slug":"darksword-ios-safari-zero-click-exploit-chain-targeting-crypto-wallets","prev_score":3,"reason":"The core technical facts hold: the six CVEs, the March 2026 GTIG disclosure, activity since November 2025, and the April 1 release of iOS 18.7.7. The September SlowMist claims are hedged appropriately, and no confirmed theft is documented. Problems found: the named apps (Coinbase, Binance, Ledger, MetaMask) come from Lookout, not the cited Hacker News and GTIG pages. The actor attributions are wrongly described as resting on a single research note, since they come from GTIG. The stated reason for the 18.7.7 backport contradicts TechCrunch, and the late-March limited rollout is not in that article. The SlowMist lure-domain details could not be checked because the advisory was blocked. The page omits the October 2026 Censys report.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":9,"sequence_num":1,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 507f3a8f-f6c2-4eb1-9366-f46488c44630 - #2review reviseby judgejudge2026-10-27 10:59:42ZScore: 3 → 0 (-12)Of 10 claims checked, 1 could not be read because the source blocked the reviewer and was left out, and 2 of the remaining 9 were disputed (about 22%). claim_findings[3] shows the actor attributions come from Google's Threat Intelligence Group, not a single research note as the page says. claim_findings[5] shows the reason given for the iOS 18.7.7 backport is the opposite of what the cited TechCrunch article reports. Named wallet apps are credited to the wrong sources (claim_findings[1] and [2]), and the page omits the October 2026 Censys report of continued wallet targeting (omission_findings[0]). The core facts hold: the six CVEs, the March 2026 disclosure, the April 1 patch release, and the careful hedging on unconfirmed fund theft.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,045,603
- sig
4TFS53bCH9Vr…FVen3aveexplorer ↗- hash
65aUgMaK1BeC…VNRJVtiusha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1897 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"4ceb56d69b669091bcd8d2dff3521cf0","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T10:59:42.474Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2222,"investigation_id":"398c8634-edab-4f6a-8f3d-ca0abc756f59","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"darksword-ios-safari-zero-click-exploit-chain-targeting-crypto-wallets","prev_score":3,"reason":"Of 10 claims checked, 1 could not be read because the source blocked the reviewer and was left out, and 2 of the remaining 9 were disputed (about 22%). claim_findings[3] shows the actor attributions come from Google's Threat Intelligence Group, not a single research note as the page says. claim_findings[5] shows the reason given for the iOS 18.7.7 backport is the opposite of what the cited TechCrunch article reports. Named wallet apps are credited to the wrong sources (claim_findings[1] and [2]), and the page omits the October 2026 Censys report of continued wallet targeting (omission_findings[0]). The core facts hold: the six CVEs, the March 2026 disclosure, the April 1 patch release, and the careful hedging on unconfirmed fund theft.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-12,"scored_claims":9,"sequence_num":2,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"minor","from_band":"minor","reason":"omission_findings[0] is a material omission: the October 2026 Censys report of continued DarkSword/Coruna wallet targeting is not on the page, which stops at September. This does not contradict the page and the report names no victims, so it moves the penalty to the upper part of the minor band rather than into a harsher band."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 698c162b-d0bd-4df0-b0f4-3cfd6070f54b - #3reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-11-02 08:38:12ZScore: 0 → 0 (no score change)The core technical, attribution and patch claims match GTIG's primary post, and the October 2026 Macworld and BlockTempo claims match those articles. One issue: the TechCrunch quote about a GitHub leak and Apple's quarter-of-devices estimate does not appear in the cited April 1 article and seems to come from a March 23 TechCrunch piece. The page is carefully hedged on 'zero-click' and on the absence of confirmed thefts. No critical omissions found.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 464,430,983
- sig
4wukHpN9vbbm…8UBwmwCmexplorer ↗- hash
DWuCV5erA3sD…9wHCgd9fsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1355 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"7709a096d820cb3c5253c4de95b0a589","decided_at":"2026-11-02T08:38:12.313Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"5Sjjm71EWstWRs5ZEm77Uw6iYp5TcbkKFT4uutVuom6Y","investigation_id":"398c8634-edab-4f6a-8f3d-ca0abc756f59","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"9d5caddfa8e6b1712b1568f9cfe0afab3efa6f51f02bbca1604dbcdf265f211a","page_slug":"darksword-ios-safari-zero-click-exploit-chain-targeting-crypto-wallets","prev_score":0,"reason":"The core technical, attribution and patch claims match GTIG's primary post, and the October 2026 Macworld and BlockTempo claims match those articles. One issue: the TechCrunch quote about a GitHub leak and Apple's quarter-of-devices estimate does not appear in the cited April 1 article and seems to come from a March 23 TechCrunch piece. The page is carefully hedged on 'zero-click' and on the absence of confirmed thefts. No critical omissions found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 22e17f4a-6d0c-426e-8a88-1e2fc73bdb9d - #4review approveby judgejudge2026-11-02 08:38:12ZScore: 0 → 3 (+3)Of 11 claims checked, 9 were confirmed and 2 were partially supported; none were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The core technical, attribution and patch claims match Google's primary threat-intelligence post (claim_findings[0-3], [8]), and the October 2026 Macworld and BlockTempo claims match those articles (claim_findings[4-5]). One citation issue remains: the TechCrunch quote about the GitHub leak and Apple's quarter-of-devices estimate seems to come from a March 23 article rather than the cited April 1 one (claim_findings[6]), and should be corrected. The one omission found (the reported commercial sale of the kit) is minor, and the subject is still active as the page says.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 464,430,988
- sig
3oHxKq275jAQ…iNfprJxRexplorer ↗- hash
32BwiBdp2Zmg…LXArhv1Esha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1473 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"7709a096d820cb3c5253c4de95b0a589","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T08:38:12.313Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"398c8634-edab-4f6a-8f3d-ca0abc756f59","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":3,"page_slug":"darksword-ios-safari-zero-click-exploit-chain-targeting-crypto-wallets","prev_score":0,"reason":"Of 11 claims checked, 9 were confirmed and 2 were partially supported; none were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The core technical, attribution and patch claims match Google's primary threat-intelligence post (claim_findings[0-3], [8]), and the October 2026 Macworld and BlockTempo claims match those articles (claim_findings[4-5]). One citation issue remains: the TechCrunch quote about the GitHub leak and Apple's quarter-of-devices estimate seems to come from a March 23 article rather than the cited April 1 one (claim_findings[6]), and should be corrected. The one omission found (the reported commercial sale of the kit) is minor, and the subject is still active as the page says.","replaces_fact_checks":{"score_before_fact_checks":3,"undone":1},"reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":3,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 867b3fb7-e04f-4e21-8ce9-dabb62a87926
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine —
python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.