Audit log

Every state-changing event for Broox Bauer: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-09-23 17:18:01Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 449,768,718

   sig

   Ev2EMYycSWSi…rKTMq43ocopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   xZkReu6RG1vC…AfKD5hQUcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (19657 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"b501a392-df51-40a0-8f74-d8c3e590bd81","kind":"publish","page_slug":"brooks-bauer","published_at":"2026-09-23T17:18:00.980Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Brooks Bauer","sections":[{"content":"Brooks Bauer, known online as @WheresBroox, held a senior business development position at Axiom Exchange, a Solana-based onchain trading platform founded in 2024 and backed by Y Combinator's Winter 2025 cohort. Bauer was based in New York. His business development role gave him routine access to Axiom's internal customer support and administrative dashboards. ZachXBT's February 26, 2026 investigation named Bauer as 'one of multiple Axiom Exchange employees' allegedly abusing the lack of access controls on those tools.","heading":"Identity and Role at Axiom Exchange","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT on X — original thread naming @WheresBroox","type":"social_media","url":"https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2027016064534757659"},{"credibility":1,"name":"ZachXBT alleges Axiom employee conducted insider trading — CoinDesk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/26/zachxbt-alleges-axiom-employee-conducted-insider-trading"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Solana trading platform employees accused of insider trading — DL News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/axiom-employees-accused-of-insider-trading-using-sensitive-customer-data/"}]},{"content":"ZachXBT alleged that Bauer exploited Axiom's internal administrative dashboard — which reportedly lacked any meaningful access controls — to look up non-public user information, including linked wallet addresses, tracked wallet lists, transaction histories, wallet labels, and linked social accounts. According to the investigation, Bauer and a small group of associates used this data to identify and monitor the wallets of prominent traders and crypto influencers, then allegedly front-ran those traders' positions. The scheme allegedly began in early 2025, shortly after Axiom's platform launch, and continued for approximately 10 months before ZachXBT's disclosure. According to multiple reporting outlets citing ZachXBT's findings, the group is alleged to have profited over $400,000 through this activity. These remain allegations; no court or regulatory body has adjudicated them.","heading":"Alleged Insider Trading Scheme","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"ZachXBT alleges Axiom employee conducted insider trading — CoinDesk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/26/zachxbt-alleges-axiom-employee-conducted-insider-trading"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Axiom Crypto Exposed: ZachXBT Alleges $400k Insider Trading — CryptoNews","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptonews.com/news/axiom-crypto-data-scandal-insider-trading-governance-failures/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Breaking: ZachXBT accuses Axiom employees of insider trading — crypto.news","type":"news_article","url":"https://crypto.news/zachxbt-axiom-employees-insider-trading-report-2026/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Axiom Exchange Insider Trading Scandal — 99Bitcoins / TradingView News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tradingview.com/news/99Bitcoins:351a5884f094b:0-axiom-exchange-insider-trading-scandal-is-your-trading-data-being-used-against-you/"}]},{"content":"ZachXBT's investigation cited several categories of evidence. First, leaked audio recordings from a private group call in early February 2026 in which a person identified as Bauer allegedly stated he could track 'any Axiom user' by referral code, wallet address, or user ID and could 'find out anything to do with that person.' In the same recording, Bauer allegedly described a plan to help an associate (referred to as 'Gowno' or 'Seb') generate $200,000 by exploiting internal access, and described starting with 10–20 wallets and gradually scaling to avoid detection. Second, screenshots of Axiom's internal dashboard allegedly showing Bauer or associates looking up named traders, including individuals referred to as 'Jerry' and 'Monix,' with activity documented between April and August 2025. Third, a Google Sheet allegedly compiled by the group mapping target wallet addresses obtained through the internal dashboard. Fourth, on-chain analysis by ZachXBT linking wallet clusters to Bauer's identity. ZachXBT stated that multiple individuals whose data appeared in leaked screenshots confirmed the accuracy of the data shown. DL News reported that Bauer did not respond to a comment request.","heading":"Evidence Presented by ZachXBT","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Breaking: ZachXBT accuses Axiom employees of insider trading — crypto.news","type":"news_article","url":"https://crypto.news/zachxbt-axiom-employees-insider-trading-report-2026/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Solana trading platform employees accused of insider trading — DL News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/axiom-employees-accused-of-insider-trading-using-sensitive-customer-data/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Leaked Call, Private Wallets, $200K Plan — CryptoPotato","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptopotato.com/leaked-call-private-wallets-200k-plan-inside-the-axiom-insider-trading-allegations/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT on X — original thread","type":"social_media","url":"https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2027016064534757659"}]},{"content":"ZachXBT's investigation did not limit its allegations to Bauer alone. The report identified several additional individuals described as employees or associates who were allegedly involved in or aware of the internal dashboard lookups. These individuals were referred to by their online handles: Ryan (Ryucio), Gowno (Seb), and a platform moderator known as Mystery. The specific roles and alleged levels of participation of these individuals were not detailed in publicly available reporting with the same specificity as Bauer. All allegations against these individuals are unproven and contested.","heading":"Other Alleged Participants","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"ZachXBT alleges Axiom employee conducted insider trading — CoinDesk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/26/zachxbt-alleges-axiom-employee-conducted-insider-trading"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Breaking: ZachXBT accuses Axiom employees of insider trading — crypto.news","type":"news_article","url":"https://crypto.news/zachxbt-axiom-employees-insider-trading-report-2026/"}]},{"content":"A secondary layer of allegations emerged on February 27, 2026, when CoinDesk reported that traders appeared to have placed bets on Polymarket's prediction market — which asked which company ZachXBT would name in an insider trading expose — shortly before the Axiom report went public, at a time when market-assessed probability of Axiom being named stood at approximately 13.8%. At least 12 wallets collectively profited over $1 million from these bets. One account identified as 'predictorxyz' converted a $65,800 bet into approximately $411,000 in profit. Over $38 million in Polymarket volume was tied to the ZachXBT reveal. On-chain analysts noted the bets were placed by newly created wallets, suggesting advance knowledge of the report's contents. Whether these Polymarket trades are directly linked to Bauer or other Axiom employees has not been publicly confirmed. These are allegations reported by journalists and on-chain analysts, not adjudicated findings.","heading":"Polymarket Front-Running Allegations","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Polymarket bettors appear to have insider-traded on a market designed to catch insider traders — CoinDesk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/27/polymarket-bettors-appear-to-have-insider-traded-on-a-market-designed-to-catch-insider-traders"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Axiom Wallet Tracking Scandal Tied To $400K Polymarket Insider Bets — BlockNow","type":"news_article","url":"https://blocknow.com/axiom-wallet-tracking-scandal-tied-to-400k-polymarket-insider-bets/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT Axiom Expose Sparked 411% Polymarket Returns — The Coin Republic","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2026/02/28/zachxbt-axiom-expose-sparked-411-polymarket-returns-as-an-insider-bet-at-13-8-odds/"}]},{"content":"Following ZachXBT's publication, Axiom Exchange issued a public statement on X, saying: 'We are shocked and disappointed to hear that someone on our team abused internal customer support tools to look up user wallets.' The company confirmed it had revoked access to the internal tools in question and stated it would 'continue to investigate and hold the responsible parties accountable.' Axiom also pledged to implement zero-trust architecture requiring multi-party authorization for access to sensitive data. Axiom's public statement did not name Bauer specifically, nor confirm or deny the specific allegations in ZachXBT's report. The platform did not publicly confirm whether Bauer or other named individuals were suspended or terminated, as of reporting available through September 2026.","heading":"Axiom Exchange Response and Remediation","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"ZachXBT alleges Axiom employee conducted insider trading — CoinDesk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/26/zachxbt-alleges-axiom-employee-conducted-insider-trading"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Y Combinator-Backed Axiom Exchange Employees Accused of Insider Trading — Yahoo Finance","type":"news_article","url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/y-combinator-backed-axiom-exchange-153837071.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Axiom Exchange insider trading: senior staffer alleged misconduct — Cryptonomist","type":"news_article","url":"https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2026/02/26/axiom-insider-trading/"}]},{"content":"As of September 2026, no criminal charges, indictment, or regulatory enforcement action by the SEC, CFTC, or DOJ against Brooks Bauer has been publicly confirmed. ZachXBT's report noted that given Bauer's New York location, the matter would likely fall within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). Law firm Kneupper & Covey announced it was investigating potential civil claims on behalf of Axiom users who may have been harmed, and noted the matter could be suitable for a class action; however, no filed lawsuit has been publicly confirmed. All allegations against Bauer remain unproven in any court or regulatory proceeding as of the last available reporting.","heading":"Legal and Regulatory Status","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Solana trading platform employees accused of insider trading — DL News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/axiom-employees-accused-of-insider-trading-using-sensitive-customer-data/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Kneupper & Covey PC — Axiom Lawsuit Investigation","type":"other","url":"https://kneuppercovey.com/axiom-lawsuit-investigation/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT Names Axiom Employee in Alleged Insider Trading Probe — CoinLaw","type":"news_article","url":"https://coinlaw.io/zachxbt-axiom-employee-alleged-insider-trading-probe/"}]},{"content":"The primary source of allegations is ZachXBT, a pseudonymous on-chain investigator with a track record of accurate disclosures but whose reports constitute investigative findings rather than legal adjudications. ZachXBT's original thread on X is the root source; secondary coverage from CoinDesk (Tier 1), DL News (Tier 2), crypto.news, and Yahoo Finance corroborates the main factual outline. Audio recordings and screenshots cited in ZachXBT's report have not been independently authenticated by a court or forensic third party. The absence of a public response or denial from Bauer, combined with Axiom's admission that internal tool abuse occurred, lends corroboration to the general outline of the allegations. Financial figures ($400,000+ in alleged profits) are drawn from multiple independent reporting outlets citing ZachXBT's analysis, not from public financial records or court filings.","heading":"Source Credibility and Confidence Notes","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT on X — original thread","type":"social_media","url":"https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2027016064534757659"},{"credibility":1,"name":"ZachXBT alleges Axiom employee conducted insider trading — CoinDesk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/26/zachxbt-alleges-axiom-employee-conducted-insider-trading"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT on X — original investigation thread naming @WheresBroox (Broox Bauer)","type":"social_media","url":"https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2027016064534757659"},{"credibility":1,"name":"ZachXBT alleges Axiom employee conducted insider trading — CoinDesk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/26/zachxbt-alleges-axiom-employee-conducted-insider-trading"},{"credibility":1,"name":"The Protocol: Blockchain sleuth ZachXBT alleges Axiom employee conducted insider trading — CoinDesk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/02/26/the-protocol-blockchain-sleuth-zachxbt-alleges-axiom-employee-conducted-insider-trading"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Polymarket bettors appear to have insider-traded on a market designed to catch insider traders — CoinDesk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/27/polymarket-bettors-appear-to-have-insider-traded-on-a-market-designed-to-catch-insider-traders"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Y Combinator-Backed Axiom Exchange Employees Accused of Insider Trading: ZachXBT — Yahoo Finance","type":"news_article","url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/y-combinator-backed-axiom-exchange-153837071.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Solana trading platform employees accused of insider trading using sensitive customer data — DL News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/axiom-employees-accused-of-insider-trading-using-sensitive-customer-data/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Breaking: ZachXBT accuses Axiom employees of insider trading — crypto.news","type":"news_article","url":"https://crypto.news/zachxbt-axiom-employees-insider-trading-report-2026/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Axiom Crypto Exposed: ZachXBT Alleges $400k Insider Trading — CryptoNews","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptonews.com/news/axiom-crypto-data-scandal-insider-trading-governance-failures/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT Exposes Axiom Insider Trading Scandal Involving Internal Tool Abuse — FinanceFeeds","type":"news_article","url":"https://financefeeds.com/zachxbt-exposes-axiom-insider-trading-scandal-involving-internal-tool-abuse/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Leaked Call, Private Wallets, $200K Plan: Inside the Axiom Insider Trading Allegations — CryptoPotato","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptopotato.com/leaked-call-private-wallets-200k-plan-inside-the-axiom-insider-trading-allegations/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Axiom insider trading: senior staffer alleged misconduct — Cryptonomist","type":"news_article","url":"https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2026/02/26/axiom-insider-trading/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT Names Axiom Exchange in Alleged Employee Crypto Insider Trading Investigation — CoinGape","type":"news_article","url":"https://coingape.com/zachxbt-names-axiom-exchange-in-alleged-employee-crypto-insider-trading-investigation/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Axiom Wallet Tracking Scandal Tied To $400K Polymarket Insider Bets — BlockNow","type":"news_article","url":"https://blocknow.com/axiom-wallet-tracking-scandal-tied-to-400k-polymarket-insider-bets/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT Axiom Expose Sparked 411% Polymarket Returns as an Insider Bet at 13.8% Odds — The Coin Republic","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2026/02/28/zachxbt-axiom-expose-sparked-411-polymarket-returns-as-an-insider-bet-at-13-8-odds/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Kneupper & Covey PC — Axiom Lawsuit Investigation page","type":"other","url":"https://kneuppercovey.com/axiom-lawsuit-investigation/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"ZachXBT Names Axiom Employee in Alleged Insider Trading Probe — CoinLaw","type":"news_article","url":"https://coinlaw.io/zachxbt-axiom-employee-alleged-insider-trading-probe/"}],"summary":"Brooks Bauer (online handle @WheresBroox) was a senior business development employee at Y Combinator-backed Axiom Exchange based in New York. On February 26, 2026, on-chain investigator ZachXBT published an investigation alleging Bauer was the primary actor in a scheme spanning roughly 10 months in which he exploited Axiom's internal back-end tools — which lacked access controls — to look up sensitive user wallet data and coordinate front-running trades, allegedly profiting over $400,000. Axiom stated it was 'shocked and disappointed,' revoked tool access, and launched an internal investigation; no criminal charges have been publicly confirmed as of September 2026.","timeline":[{"date":"2025-01-01","event":"Axiom Exchange platform launches on Solana, approximately when ZachXBT's investigation alleged the internal tool abuse began.","source":"crypto.news / DL News","source_url":"https://crypto.news/zachxbt-axiom-employees-insider-trading-report-2026/"},{"date":"2025-04-01","event":"Screenshots cited by ZachXBT reportedly show internal Axiom dashboards being used to look up named traders' wallet data, with documented activity beginning around this period.","source":"crypto.news","source_url":"https://crypto.news/zachxbt-axiom-employees-insider-trading-report-2026/"},{"date":"2026-02-01","event":"Recorded private group call in which a person identified as Bauer allegedly describes a plan for an associate to earn $200,000 by exploiting internal Axiom access.","source":"DL News / crypto.news","source_url":"https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/axiom-employees-accused-of-insider-trading-using-sensitive-customer-data/"},{"date":"2026-02-26","event":"ZachXBT publishes full investigation on X, naming Brooks Bauer (@WheresBroox) as primary alleged actor in the scheme and describing the internal tool abuse, audio evidence, and on-chain analysis.","source":"ZachXBT on X / CoinDesk","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/26/zachxbt-alleges-axiom-employee-conducted-insider-trading"},{"date":"2026-02-26","event":"Axiom Exchange issues public statement saying it is 'shocked and disappointed,' revokes access to internal tools, and commits to an internal investigation.","source":"CoinDesk / Yahoo Finance","source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/y-combinator-backed-axiom-exchange-153837071.html"},{"date":"2026-02-27","event":"CoinDesk reports that traders appear to have placed advance bets on Polymarket — before the Axiom report was public — with at least one wallet turning $65,800 into approximately $411,000 in profit; over $38 million in Polymarket volume driven by the reveal.","source":"CoinDesk","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/27/polymarket-bettors-appear-to-have-insider-traded-on-a-market-designed-to-catch-insider-traders"},{"date":"2026-02-28","event":"Law firm Kneupper & Covey announces investigation into potential civil claims on behalf of Axiom users, noting possible suitability for class action.","source":"Kneupper & Covey PC","source_url":"https://kneuppercovey.com/axiom-lawsuit-investigation/"}]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 2928efa7-0d04-4b32-a219-773c3c01f9f0copy
2. #2rescoreby systemsystem

   2026-10-10 18:42:20Z
   Score: 14 → 26 (+12)
   Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 14 → 26. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −59, problems around the subject, caused by others −3.8; legitimacy credit long-running +2; no established finding that it defrauded anyone, so it stays out of the red band.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 455,361,820

   sig

   5hy7m8T4gyv5…mPJcsbcscopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   7S9kuCf8oZcJ…1b8UShzjcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (685 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-10T18:42:20.774Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"b501a392-df51-40a0-8f74-d8c3e590bd81","new_score":26,"page_slug":"brooks-bauer","prev_score":14,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 14 → 26. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −59, problems around the subject, caused by others −3.8; legitimacy credit long-running +2; no established finding that it defrauded anyone, so it stays out of the red band.","score_delta":12,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 48729e3e-23e3-456b-924c-db9c3d674bffcopy
3. #3reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-27 11:29:37Z
   Score: 26 → 26 (no score change)
   The core narrative holds: Bauer's role and location, the April and August 2025 screenshots, the roughly 10-month duration and Axiom's response match CoinDesk and DL News, and the page is consistently hedged as allegations. The main defects are misattributed figures (the $59,800 and $109,000 trades are not in the cited DL News and Cryptonews.net articles), a $400,000 profit figure that neither CoinDesk nor DL News gives, and a leftover 'merged pages disagree' editorial note about who was the moderator. Only a handful of the cited sources were checked, and no later developments were found.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,053,956

   sig

   2xyFXXeXxiAt…UgeNmBEPcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   6P8dhPvscQWX…kEfew7Rncopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1407 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"c729f05d1189f09e8a4e9b07de7c2554","decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:29:36.629Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2857,"findings_hash":"8FjgQibHLNzYT3AqaPRjpWwCtauTT2arB6y3TEy6WYFz","investigation_id":"b501a392-df51-40a0-8f74-d8c3e590bd81","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"page_content_hash":"0895ed44f9c73090367d9ffc04c5167c4afe97f4ca8c9512219366489d874228","page_slug":"brooks-bauer","prev_score":26,"reason":"The core narrative holds: Bauer's role and location, the April and August 2025 screenshots, the roughly 10-month duration and Axiom's response match CoinDesk and DL News, and the page is consistently hedged as allegations. The main defects are misattributed figures (the $59,800 and $109,000 trades are not in the cited DL News and Cryptonews.net articles), a $400,000 profit figure that neither CoinDesk nor DL News gives, and a leftover 'merged pages disagree' editorial note about who was the moderator. Only a handful of the cited sources were checked, and no later developments were found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision e4705ff2-4792-4059-b299-8fcbe03f2bcfcopy
4. #4review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-10-27 11:29:37Z
   Score: 26 → 26 (no score change)
   Of 7 claims checked, none were disputed and 2 could not be verified (claim_findings[2] and claim_findings[6]), giving about 29%, which falls in the minor-issues band. The main defects are the $59,800 and $109,000 trade figures, which do not appear in the DL News or Cryptonews.net articles cited for them (claim_findings[2]), and a $400,000 profit figure that neither CoinDesk nor DL News gives (claim_findings[1]). The 'Other alleged participants' section also carries a leftover editorial note about conflicting merged pages (claim_findings[3]). The core account (Bauer's role, the roughly 10-month duration, Axiom's response) matches Tier 1 and Tier 2 reporting and is consistently presented as allegation. The reviewer's confidence was low and its one unverifiable legal-status claim is a negative that cannot be confirmed, so the penalty is kept at the mild end of the band. No material omissions or contradicting subject status were reported.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,053,961

   sig

   CJ3xAJJNCMB9…wVrQBgNrcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   C8VCaNBfLt3h…herdNGxrcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1594 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"c729f05d1189f09e8a4e9b07de7c2554","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:29:36.629Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2857,"investigation_id":"b501a392-df51-40a0-8f74-d8c3e590bd81","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"page_slug":"brooks-bauer","prev_score":26,"reason":"Of 7 claims checked, none were disputed and 2 could not be verified (claim_findings[2] and claim_findings[6]), giving about 29%, which falls in the minor-issues band. The main defects are the $59,800 and $109,000 trade figures, which do not appear in the DL News or Cryptonews.net articles cited for them (claim_findings[2]), and a $400,000 profit figure that neither CoinDesk nor DL News gives (claim_findings[1]). The 'Other alleged participants' section also carries a leftover editorial note about conflicting merged pages (claim_findings[3]). The core account (Bauer's role, the roughly 10-month duration, Axiom's response) matches Tier 1 and Tier 2 reporting and is consistently presented as allegation. The reviewer's confidence was low and its one unverifiable legal-status claim is a negative that cannot be confirmed, so the penalty is kept at the mild end of the band. No material omissions or contradicting subject status were reported.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 644c77f4-ed62-4da5-8b04-344f0dfea971copy
5. #5reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-27 18:16:01Z
   Score: 26 → 26 (no score change)
   The core allegations, dates, quotes, dollar figures and the Axiom response match the sources checked (Decrypt, DL News, Cointelegraph, Forklog, Coin360). The page hedges consistently as allegations. The weakest points are the secondary-person names (Ryan/Ryucio, Gowno/Seb), which rest on one aggregator, and the founders-not-implicated attribution, which I could not confirm in the cited outlets. No contradicting current status was found.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,168,597

   sig

   2NbUXWFrwgPj…sqCUEHhgcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   nrCjrFsa2mAT…3eihMfNxcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1254 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"b9930a2269ef55dc91429339f894f129","decided_at":"2026-10-27T18:16:01.599Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.125,"findings_hash":"9JoDWkmJmaR4xZjpKfbQvsp5LCkkegPJkwSeaWUjdfCW","investigation_id":"b501a392-df51-40a0-8f74-d8c3e590bd81","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"page_content_hash":"7d7fe65a6b314e7fa160b16186adbabb4d878f8b422cfc5531455ac0b3421610","page_slug":"brooks-bauer","prev_score":26,"reason":"The core allegations, dates, quotes, dollar figures and the Axiom response match the sources checked (Decrypt, DL News, Cointelegraph, Forklog, Coin360). The page hedges consistently as allegations. The weakest points are the secondary-person names (Ryan/Ryucio, Gowno/Seb), which rest on one aggregator, and the founders-not-implicated attribution, which I could not confirm in the cited outlets. No contradicting current status was found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 3ec4a015-929d-47ee-81b1-39d4009a5249copy
6. #6review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-10-27 18:16:01Z
   Score: 26 → 26 (no score change)
   Six of the eight claims checked were confirmed against Tier 2 sources, including the core allegations, dates, dollar figures and Axiom's response. One claim could not be verified: the statement that the co-founders were not alleged to have known about the conduct (claim_findings[7]). That puts the unverified share at 1 of 8 (12.5%). One further claim, naming Ryan/Ryucio and Gowno/Seb (claim_findings[6]), is only partly supported because it rests on a single aggregator that does not allege wrongdoing by them. The review found no change in Axiom's status and no omissions, and it lists a high-priority gap on developments after February 2026. A small penalty applies, softened because the reviewer's confidence was moderate.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,168,602

   sig

   4CsHnV8UX2m9…JBzGkbzCcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   8t5R5j1qTFkB…n3dsb1Vjcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1373 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"b9930a2269ef55dc91429339f894f129","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T18:16:01.599Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.125,"investigation_id":"b501a392-df51-40a0-8f74-d8c3e590bd81","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"page_slug":"brooks-bauer","prev_score":26,"reason":"Six of the eight claims checked were confirmed against Tier 2 sources, including the core allegations, dates, dollar figures and Axiom's response. One claim could not be verified: the statement that the co-founders were not alleged to have known about the conduct (claim_findings[7]). That puts the unverified share at 1 of 8 (12.5%). One further claim, naming Ryan/Ryucio and Gowno/Seb (claim_findings[6]), is only partly supported because it rests on a single aggregator that does not allege wrongdoing by them. The review found no change in Axiom's status and no omissions, and it lists a high-priority gap on developments after February 2026. A small penalty applies, softened because the reviewer's confidence was moderate.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision f8b33486-7418-4bf4-9071-9e9d80f7490ccopy
7. #7reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-28 06:25:40Z
   Score: 26 → 26 (no score change)
   This page is unusually well-sourced and carefully hedged for a story that is only allegations against a named individual. Every section-level claim I checked against its cited sources was independently confirmed by directly fetching or searching for the underlying Decrypt, DL News, The Block, Cointelegraph, Forklog, Yellow.com, Coin360, and Yahoo Finance/Moby articles, including exact verbatim quotes attributed to Bauer and to Axiom. The one weakness found is a single sentence in the Polymarket trading section that collapses two distinct winning wallets/accounts into language implying one trader with a range of outcomes, which should be clarified. The page is appropriately cautious about unconfirmed details (the 'Mystery' third party, the predictorxyz identity, SDNY jurisdiction) and correctly disambiguates the unrelated 'Axiom Holdings, Inc.' penny stock. No regulatory or prosecutorial action against Bauer has been found anywhere, consistent with the page's own statement, and Axiom the platform continues to operate without any reported shutdown or sanction. Omissions found are minor (a financial-motive screenshot detail, and an explicit note on the lack of 8-month follow-up) rather than material or critical.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,374,199

   sig

   WgHva8xNDiJx…cidDddBRcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   BXkNdjhtab7k…9Bk8hp1xcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (2012 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"280e4f7e6abfe2ec62c4a8dd5210c6cd","decided_at":"2026-10-28T06:25:39.905Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"GcSobVJ5nXnZGCiccZJ94DULtyAt64DquwLaNcWin3DD","investigation_id":"b501a392-df51-40a0-8f74-d8c3e590bd81","mode":"findings_only","new_score":26,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"7d7fe65a6b314e7fa160b16186adbabb4d878f8b422cfc5531455ac0b3421610","page_slug":"brooks-bauer","prev_score":26,"reason":"This page is unusually well-sourced and carefully hedged for a story that is only allegations against a named individual. Every section-level claim I checked against its cited sources was independently confirmed by directly fetching or searching for the underlying Decrypt, DL News, The Block, Cointelegraph, Forklog, Yellow.com, Coin360, and Yahoo Finance/Moby articles, including exact verbatim quotes attributed to Bauer and to Axiom. The one weakness found is a single sentence in the Polymarket trading section that collapses two distinct winning wallets/accounts into language implying one trader with a range of outcomes, which should be clarified. The page is appropriately cautious about unconfirmed details (the 'Mystery' third party, the predictorxyz identity, SDNY jurisdiction) and correctly disambiguates the unrelated 'Axiom Holdings, Inc.' penny stock. No regulatory or prosecutorial action against Bauer has been found anywhere, consistent with the page's own statement, and Axiom the platform continues to operate without any reported shutdown or sanction. Omissions found are minor (a financial-motive screenshot detail, and an explicit note on the lack of 8-month follow-up) rather than material or critical.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":7,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 952ea9c0-9413-45c4-85ae-3eafddec5917copy