Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#3
Score
26 → 26 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
462053956
Off-chain at
2026-10-27T11:29:37.018Z
Anchored at
2026-10-27T11:29:39.000Z
Block time
2026-10-27T11:29:39.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
6P8dhPvscQWX7sEzyMTXvYQBBLu2NWnrKbhEkEfew7Rn
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1407 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"c729f05d1189f09e8a4e9b07de7c2554","decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:29:36.629Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2857,"findings_hash":"8FjgQibHLNzYT3AqaPRjpWwCtauTT2arB6y3TEy6WYFz","investigation_id":"b501a392-df51-40a0-8f74-d8c3e590bd81","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"page_content_hash":"0895ed44f9c73090367d9ffc04c5167c4afe97f4ca8c9512219366489d874228","page_slug":"brooks-bauer","prev_score":26,"reason":"The core narrative holds: Bauer's role and location, the April and August 2025 screenshots, the roughly 10-month duration and Axiom's response match CoinDesk and DL News, and the page is consistently hedged as allegations. The main defects are misattributed figures (the $59,800 and $109,000 trades are not in the cited DL News and Cryptonews.net articles), a $400,000 profit figure that neither CoinDesk nor DL News gives, and a leftover 'merged pages disagree' editorial note about who was the moderator. Only a handful of the cited sources were checked, and no later developments were found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}