Audit log

Every state-changing event for Blur Finance: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-05-30 12:11:37Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 423,153,859

   sig

   5WTQt2FugRFv…HLFfDjFxcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   GW4mQQVKieLv…hx4V8fktcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (9446 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"5885afbd-3fec-4be4-a732-12b9cfb3e382","kind":"publish","page_slug":"blur-finance","published_at":"2026-05-30T12:11:37.162Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Blur Finance","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"ICOholder — Blur Finance (BLR) listing with team details","type":"other","url":"https://icoholder.com/en/blur-finance-1028674"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Dedaub — Blur Finance v1.0 Smart Contract Security Audit Report (June 10, 2022)","type":"research","url":"https://dedaub.com/audits/blur/blur-finance-v1-0-jun-10-2022/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk — Over $600K Vanishes From DeFi Project Blur Finance as Developers Disappear","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/08/10/more-than-600k-vanishes-from-defi-project-blur-finance-as-developers-disappear"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk — Over $600K Vanishes From DeFi Project Blur Finance as Developers Disappear","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/08/10/more-than-600k-vanishes-from-defi-project-blur-finance-as-developers-disappear"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoSlate — Blur Finance allegedly rug pulled, investors at a combined $600K loss","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptoslate.com/blur-finance-allegedly-rug-pulled-investors-at-a-combined-600k-loss/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"IBTimes — DeFi Project Blur Finance Rug-Pulled For $600,000; BLR Token Crashes 99%","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.ibtimes.com/defi-project-blur-finance-rug-pulled-600000-blr-token-crashes-99-3600623"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Crypto Times — DeFi Project Blur Finance Vanishes with more than $600K","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2022/08/10/defi-project-blur-finance-vanishes-with-more-than-600k/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"TronWeekly — Developers Of A Polygon-Based DeFi Project Blur Finance Flee With $600K","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tronweekly.com/polygon-blur-finance-flees-600k/"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"BscScan — Blur Finance Rug Pull contract address (BNB Chain)","type":"on_chain","url":"https://bscscan.com/address/0x4165084A6e5388ce53c9D9892f904a2712Dd943A"},{"credibility":1,"name":"PolygonScan — Blur Finance Rug Pull contract address (Polygon)","type":"on_chain","url":"https://polygonscan.com/address/0xd8a5885e456c265e9938fecc3dde7357c58b630c"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"IBTimes — DeFi Project Blur Finance Rug-Pulled For $600,000; BLR Token Crashes 99% (quotes ZachXBT)","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.ibtimes.com/defi-project-blur-finance-rug-pulled-600000-blr-token-crashes-99-3600623"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk — Over $600K Vanishes From DeFi Project Blur Finance (PeckShield / Adam0658 attribution)","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/08/10/more-than-600k-vanishes-from-defi-project-blur-finance-as-developers-disappear"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Hacken — The rug pull worth $600,000 from Blur Finance","type":"research","url":"https://hackenproof.com/blog/industry-news/the-rug-pull-from-blur-finance"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk — Over $600K Vanishes From DeFi Project Blur Finance as Developers Disappear","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/08/10/more-than-600k-vanishes-from-defi-project-blur-finance-as-developers-disappear"},{"credibility":3,"name":"ICOholder — Blur Finance (BLR) team verification data","type":"other","url":"https://icoholder.com/en/blur-finance-1028674"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Dedaub — Blur Finance v1.0 Smart Contract Security Audit (June 2022)","type":"research","url":"https://dedaub.com/audits/blur/blur-finance-v1-0-jun-10-2022/"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"DefiLlama — Blur Finance protocol page","type":"other","url":"https://defillama.com/protocol/blur-finance"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Dedaub — Blur Finance Delta Smart Contract Audit (January 2023, covering NFT marketplace governance)","type":"research","url":"https://dedaub.com/audits/blur/blur-finance-delta-jan-20-2023/"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk — Over $600K Vanishes From DeFi Project Blur Finance as Developers Disappear","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/08/10/more-than-600k-vanishes-from-defi-project-blur-finance-as-developers-disappear"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoSlate — Blur Finance allegedly rug pulled, investors at a combined $600K loss","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptoslate.com/blur-finance-allegedly-rug-pulled-investors-at-a-combined-600k-loss/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"IBTimes — DeFi Project Blur Finance Rug-Pulled For $600,000; BLR Token Crashes 99%","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.ibtimes.com/defi-project-blur-finance-rug-pulled-600000-blr-token-crashes-99-3600623"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Crypto Times — DeFi Project Blur Finance Vanishes with more than $600K","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2022/08/10/defi-project-blur-finance-vanishes-with-more-than-600k/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"TronWeekly — Developers Of A Polygon-Based DeFi Project Blur Finance Flee With $600K","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tronweekly.com/polygon-blur-finance-flees-600k/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Hacken — The rug pull worth $600,000 from Blur Finance","type":"research","url":"https://hackenproof.com/blog/industry-news/the-rug-pull-from-blur-finance"},{"credibility":1,"name":"BscScan — Blur Finance BLR token contract (BNB Chain), labeled Fake_Phishing438","type":"on_chain","url":"https://bscscan.com/address/0x4165084A6e5388ce53c9D9892f904a2712Dd943A"},{"credibility":1,"name":"PolygonScan — Blur Finance BLR token contract (Polygon), flagged as rug pull","type":"on_chain","url":"https://polygonscan.com/address/0xd8a5885e456c265e9938fecc3dde7357c58b630c"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Dedaub — Blur Finance v1.0 Smart Contract Security Audit Report (June 10, 2022)","type":"research","url":"https://dedaub.com/audits/blur/blur-finance-v1-0-jun-10-2022/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"ICOholder — Blur Finance (BLR) rating and team details","type":"other","url":"https://icoholder.com/en/blur-finance-1028674"},{"credibility":2,"name":"DefiLlama — Blur Finance protocol page","type":"other","url":"https://defillama.com/protocol/blur-finance"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Dedaub — Blur Finance Delta Audit (January 2023, NFT marketplace governance — disambiguation)","type":"research","url":"https://dedaub.com/audits/blur/blur-finance-delta-jan-20-2023/"}],"summary":"Blur Finance (ticker: BLR) was a yield aggregator DeFi protocol that operated on BNB Chain and Polygon in mid-2022. In August 2022, developers allegedly executed a textbook rug pull, withdrawing approximately $600,000 from user-deposited funds before deleting all social media channels and abandoning the project. The BLR token collapsed 99%, and the protocol's smart contracts on both chains have since been formally flagged on BscScan and PolygonScan as rug pull addresses.","timeline":[{"date":"2022-07-07","event":"Blur Finance BLR token contract created on BNB Chain; the protocol begins operations as a yield aggregator on PancakeSwap.","source":"CoinDesk / CryptoSlate reporting","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/08/10/more-than-600k-vanishes-from-defi-project-blur-finance-as-developers-disappear"},{"date":"2022-06-10","event":"Dedaub completes a smart contract security audit of Blur Finance v1.0, identifying two high-severity issues (both reported as resolved).","source":"Dedaub Audit Reports","source_url":"https://dedaub.com/audits/blur/blur-finance-v1-0-jun-10-2022/"},{"date":"2022-08-04","event":"BLR token reaches its all-time high price of approximately $0.06–$0.07 on decentralized exchanges.","source":"IBTimes / CryptoSlate reporting","source_url":"https://www.ibtimes.com/defi-project-blur-finance-rug-pulled-600000-blr-token-crashes-99-3600623"},{"date":"2022-08-09","event":"Alleged rug pull executed: developers withdraw approximately $600,000 from Blur Finance contracts on Polygon and BNB Chain within minutes. Social media channels are deleted and the project website goes dark.","source":"PeckShield alert / CoinDesk","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/08/10/more-than-600k-vanishes-from-defi-project-blur-finance-as-developers-disappear"},{"date":"2022-08-10","event":"PeckShield publicly reports the Blur Finance rug pull. BLR token collapses 99% to $0.00064. Multiple crypto news outlets cover the incident. ZachXBT comments on the case as an example of DeFi investor risk.","source":"CoinDesk, CryptoSlate, IBTimes, The Crypto Times","source_url":"https://cryptoslate.com/blur-finance-allegedly-rug-pulled-investors-at-a-combined-600k-loss/"},{"date":"2022-08-10","event":"BscScan labels the BLR token contract creator address as 'Fake_Phishing438' and both the BNB Chain and Polygon contracts are flagged as rug pull addresses.","source":"BscScan / PolygonScan on-chain data","source_url":"https://bscscan.com/address/0x4165084A6e5388ce53c9D9892f904a2712Dd943A"}]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 5730b5ee-30ab-4cf5-ad5b-b512741c43e2copy
2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-06-13 18:42:55Z
   Score: 2 → 2 (no score change)
   The Blur Finance investigation is well-sourced for its core factual claims: the rug pull event, $600K loss figure, dual-chain operation, 99% token collapse, and both block explorer labels are confirmed across multiple independent credible sources. The four partially-supported findings are minor: the PancakeSwap attribution is plausible but not explicitly cited; the August 9 vs August 10 timing distinction is ambiguous in sources; the 'Fake_Phishing438' label applies to a related deployer wallet not the directly cited contract address; and the Dedaub Delta audit cited is for the unrelated blur.io NFT marketplace. No claims are disputed or unverifiable, and no link rot was detected.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 426,255,444

   sig

   WBMGGQdn3Lqd…HhRWfHzccopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   AGZYqehMk9cL…aaTSCQ7icopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1035 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-13T18:42:54.763Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"5885afbd-3fec-4be4-a732-12b9cfb3e382","new_score":2,"page_slug":"blur-finance","prev_score":2,"reason":"The Blur Finance investigation is well-sourced for its core factual claims: the rug pull event, $600K loss figure, dual-chain operation, 99% token collapse, and both block explorer labels are confirmed across multiple independent credible sources. The four partially-supported findings are minor: the PancakeSwap attribution is plausible but not explicitly cited; the August 9 vs August 10 timing distinction is ambiguous in sources; the 'Fake_Phishing438' label applies to a related deployer wallet not the directly cited contract address; and the Dedaub Delta audit cited is for the unrelated blur.io NFT marketplace. No claims are disputed or unverifiable, and no link rot was detected.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision be235631-662c-4eb1-badd-3e0bf8784272copy
3. #3review approveby judgejudge

   2026-06-13 18:42:55Z
   Score: 2 → 2 (no score change)
   The reviewer found 0 disputed claims across 12 assessed claims, placing this page firmly in the 0%–10% approval band. All core allegations — the $600K rug pull, dual-chain operation on BNB Chain and Polygon, 99% token collapse, developer disappearance, and block explorer labels — are confirmed by at least one Tier 1 source (CoinDesk, BscScan, PolygonScan). The four partially-supported findings (claim_findings[5], [8], [10], [11]) are minor in nature: a plausible but unconfirmed DEX attribution, a one-day timing ambiguity, an address label specificity nuance, and a disambiguation citation for an unrelated project. None of these undermine the page's factual core. Two high-priority coverage gaps (on-chain wallet tracing, developer de-anonymization) are noted but gaps of this type indicate expansion opportunities, not grounds for denial. Reviewer confidence of 0.85 supports a clean approval.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 426,255,449

   sig

   4n7hUn2A2X6w…5zFjxhvscopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   69G91oDyYJwU…wpDh6QdHcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1251 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-13T18:42:54.763Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"5885afbd-3fec-4be4-a732-12b9cfb3e382","new_score":2,"page_slug":"blur-finance","prev_score":2,"reason":"The reviewer found 0 disputed claims across 12 assessed claims, placing this page firmly in the 0%–10% approval band. All core allegations — the $600K rug pull, dual-chain operation on BNB Chain and Polygon, 99% token collapse, developer disappearance, and block explorer labels — are confirmed by at least one Tier 1 source (CoinDesk, BscScan, PolygonScan). The four partially-supported findings (claim_findings[5], [8], [10], [11]) are minor in nature: a plausible but unconfirmed DEX attribution, a one-day timing ambiguity, an address label specificity nuance, and a disambiguation citation for an unrelated project. None of these undermine the page's factual core. Two high-priority coverage gaps (on-chain wallet tracing, developer de-anonymization) are noted but gaps of this type indicate expansion opportunities, not grounds for denial. Reviewer confidence of 0.85 supports a clean approval.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 708a342e-dd88-46d7-b05e-9234911cd7b6copy
4. #4reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-16 23:14:12Z
   Score: 2 → 2 (no score change)
   The core narrative — a ~$600,000 rug pull from the BLR yield-aggregator protocol across BNB Chain and Polygon in August 2022, developer disappearance, 99% token collapse, and PeckShield's public flagging — is well supported by multiple independent, credible news sources (CoinDesk, CryptoSlate, IBTimes, TronWeekly) that were successfully fetched and cross-checked. Team-verification claims (ICOholder's 0% verification rate) and the contemporaneous Dragoma/Teddy Doge rug pulls are also independently confirmed. However, the page contains a significant, repeated factual error: it attributes a June 2022 Dedaub smart-contract security audit to the rug-pulled BLR protocol in three separate places (Protocol Overview, Scam Pattern and Red Flags, and the timeline), when the cited Dedaub report is actually an audit of the unrelated, legitimate NFT marketplace Blur (blur.io) — the very entity the page's own Disambiguation section says is a different project. This is a materially misleading conflation given the audit is used as evidence of either legitimacy-window-dressing or a scam red flag. Additionally, one cited Hacken source URL is dead (404) and could not be confirmed to say what the page attributes to it, and several precise on-chain figures (BscScan/PolygonScan transaction counts, balances, and the 'Fake_Phishing438' label) could not be independently verified because both block explorers return 403 to automated fetch tools and the cited wayback archive snapshots are unreachable from this environment — these are flagged unverifiable rather than disputed. A claimed 'July 2023 Dedaub audit of Exchange V2' for the NFT marketplace could not be located in available audit indices.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 457,816,582

   sig

   51LTcH4mMNx7…sBpi34yncopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   822GEn3VDTRV…SgmNR4Wwcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (2290 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"57b6de8ee20ca6d632f58ab922ee541f","decided_at":"2026-10-16T23:14:12.235Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.35,"findings_hash":"Dydw4eFkdM4MLFZNa58fPT1U1KXJ939uNweRTRudA7uW","investigation_id":"5885afbd-3fec-4be4-a732-12b9cfb3e382","mode":"findings_only","new_score":2,"page_content_hash":"1b852efb2db18dc3fef1e3bc8a73ec52883624a2b343d71e0cad8f05d9a504bd","page_slug":"blur-finance","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core narrative — a ~$600,000 rug pull from the BLR yield-aggregator protocol across BNB Chain and Polygon in August 2022, developer disappearance, 99% token collapse, and PeckShield's public flagging — is well supported by multiple independent, credible news sources (CoinDesk, CryptoSlate, IBTimes, TronWeekly) that were successfully fetched and cross-checked. Team-verification claims (ICOholder's 0% verification rate) and the contemporaneous Dragoma/Teddy Doge rug pulls are also independently confirmed. However, the page contains a significant, repeated factual error: it attributes a June 2022 Dedaub smart-contract security audit to the rug-pulled BLR protocol in three separate places (Protocol Overview, Scam Pattern and Red Flags, and the timeline), when the cited Dedaub report is actually an audit of the unrelated, legitimate NFT marketplace Blur (blur.io) — the very entity the page's own Disambiguation section says is a different project. This is a materially misleading conflation given the audit is used as evidence of either legitimacy-window-dressing or a scam red flag. Additionally, one cited Hacken source URL is dead (404) and could not be confirmed to say what the page attributes to it, and several precise on-chain figures (BscScan/PolygonScan transaction counts, balances, and the 'Fake_Phishing438' label) could not be independently verified because both block explorers return 403 to automated fetch tools and the cited wayback archive snapshots are unreachable from this environment — these are flagged unverifiable rather than disputed. A claimed 'July 2023 Dedaub audit of Exchange V2' for the NFT marketplace could not be located in available audit indices.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 106639b2-8ab2-4520-b35e-e7971e077a0dcopy
5. #5rescoreby systemsystem

   2026-10-27 06:03:35Z
   Score: 2 → 0 (-2)
   Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 2 → 0. The page establishes that the subject is itself a scheme, so the score is 0; 1 section(s) set aside until a failed fact-check is resolved.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 461,963,163

   sig

   321FBruoxHup…n7XbSat8copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   81dodqxQnBy2…gUxFDt7xcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (580 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-27T06:03:34.990Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"5885afbd-3fec-4be4-a732-12b9cfb3e382","new_score":0,"page_slug":"blur-finance","prev_score":2,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 2 → 0. The page establishes that the subject is itself a scheme, so the score is 0; 1 section(s) set aside until a failed fact-check is resolved.","score_delta":-2,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 0143b115-66c0-4b0b-a3f5-ed4c7aaeb8e5copy