Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Blur Finance
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 2 → 2 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426255444
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-13T18:42:55.018Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- AGZYqehMk9cLPdRZ8CNbViv1dkJ9KhUdLavNaaTSCQ7i
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1035 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-13T18:42:54.763Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"5885afbd-3fec-4be4-a732-12b9cfb3e382","new_score":2,"page_slug":"blur-finance","prev_score":2,"reason":"The Blur Finance investigation is well-sourced for its core factual claims: the rug pull event, $600K loss figure, dual-chain operation, 99% token collapse, and both block explorer labels are confirmed across multiple independent credible sources. The four partially-supported findings are minor: the PancakeSwap attribution is plausible but not explicitly cited; the August 9 vs August 10 timing distinction is ambiguous in sources; the 'Fake_Phishing438' label applies to a related deployer wallet not the directly cited contract address; and the Dedaub Delta audit cited is for the unrelated blur.io NFT marketplace. No claims are disputed or unverifiable, and no link rot was detected.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}