Audit log

Every state-changing event for Africrypt: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-05-05 22:08:55Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 417,836,266

   sig

   5Z7U93S6BVp6…DH9FPxm1copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   9yfhinAHB5s4…pvaPX4XLcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (20197 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"d7426dad-d70b-49a5-b017-96ca5a2b3bc2","kind":"publish","page_slug":"africrypt","published_at":"2026-05-05T22:08:55.156Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Africrypt","sections":[{"content":"Africrypt was founded in 2019 by Raees Cajee and Ameer Cajee, who were approximately 17 and 20 years old at the time of founding, respectively. The platform was marketed as a high-yield cryptocurrency investment service operating in South Africa. Africrypt promised investors returns of up to 10% daily or up to 13% per month through a proprietary algorithmic trading system that the founders claimed utilized artificial intelligence. Investigators and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) later described these promised returns as 'exceptionally high and unrealistic,' characteristic of Ponzi scheme structures. Internally, the platform operated as a centralized system with no external oversight, no security audits, no asset segregation, and no standardized investor agreements. Client funds were pooled and moved at the founders' discretion, including allegedly into personal accounts.","heading":"Background and Operation","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt: How investors were fleeced and left high and dry — Daily Maverick","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-04-14-africrypt-how-investors-were-fleeced-and-left-high-and-dry/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt founders under probe over $3.6B scam in South Africa — CoinGeek","type":"news_article","url":"https://coingeek.com/africrypt-founders-under-probe-over-3-6b-scam-in-south-africa/"}]},{"content":"On April 13, 2021, Africrypt investors received an email claiming the platform had suffered a hack and that all investor funds had been lost. Critically, the communication — attributed to CEO Ameer Cajee — urged investors not to report the incident to authorities or legal counsel, warning that doing so would complicate recovery efforts. This instruction was later identified by investigators and attorneys as a red flag consistent with exit scam methodology. Darren Hanekom of Hanekom Attorneys, retained by a group of investors, reported that blockchain analysis showed the 69,000 BTC held by Africrypt had been moved from client wallets through dark web tumblers and cryptocurrency mixers, fragmenting the funds to obstruct tracing. This on-chain activity was inconsistent with an external hack and consistent with deliberate internal movement of funds. Shortly after the platform went dark, both Raees and Ameer Cajee left South Africa, reportedly traveling through the Maldives to the United Kingdom and subsequently to Dubai.","heading":"Collapse and Alleged Exit Scam","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"South Africa BTC scam Africrypt makes off with $3.8B, asks victims not to report — CoinGeek","type":"news_article","url":"https://coingeek.com/south-africa-btc-scam-africrypt-makes-off-with-3-8b-asks-victims-not-to-report/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt: How investors were fleeced and left high and dry — Daily Maverick","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-04-14-africrypt-how-investors-were-fleeced-and-left-high-and-dry/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Cajee Brothers Deny $3.6 Billion Bitcoin Fraud — BankInfoSecurity","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/cajee-brothers-deny-36-billion-bitcoin-fraud-a-16950"}]},{"content":"Initial media reports, including coverage by Bloomberg, estimated that 69,000 BTC worth approximately $3.6 billion (ZAR 54 billion) at April 2021 prices had disappeared. The Cajee brothers' then-attorney, John Oosthuizen, disputed the valuation and declined to confirm the figure. Subsequent investigations and reporting by outlets including MyBroadband placed the verified investor losses significantly lower, in the range of $40 million to $50 million USD, reflecting the difficulty of reconciling actual investor deposits with the claimed 69,000 BTC figure. The exact amount lost has never been conclusively established in public legal proceedings. The initial $3.6 billion figure reflected an assumption that all 69,000 BTC were legitimately held client assets, which has not been independently verified.","heading":"Disputed Loss Figures","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"South Africa Africrypt Bitcoin Scam?: Cajee Brothers Missing Along With Billions — Bloomberg","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-06-23/s-african-brothers-vanish-and-so-does-3-6-billion-in-bitcoin"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Cajee Brothers Deny $3.6 Billion Bitcoin Fraud — BankInfoSecurity","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/cajee-brothers-deny-36-billion-bitcoin-fraud-a-16950"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Flow Analysis: Africrypt's $50M Loss — Ainvest","type":"research","url":"https://www.ainvest.com/news/flow-analysis-africrypt-50m-loss-1-5b-crypto-ecosystem-2602/"}]},{"content":"On June 24, 2021, the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) issued a public statement confirming that because cryptocurrency was not recognized as a regulated financial product under South African law at the time, it was unable to take formal regulatory action against Africrypt or the Cajee brothers. The Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) similarly declined to act due to the same legal grey zone. The FSCA's Brandon Topham noted that the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) and South African Revenue Service (SARS) would look into the matter. Hanekom Attorneys notified the Hawks, South Africa's Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation, who opened an investigation. The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) was also engaged. A provisional liquidation order against the Cajee brothers was granted by the South Gauteng High Court, with the brothers given until July 19, 2021 to contest it. The Africrypt collapse, alongside the 2020 collapse of Mirror Trading International (which lost approximately $1.2 billion), accelerated South African regulatory efforts to develop a formal framework for cryptocurrency oversight.","heading":"Regulatory Response and South African Oversight Gaps","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt founders under probe over $3.6B scam in South Africa — CoinGeek","type":"news_article","url":"https://coingeek.com/africrypt-founders-under-probe-over-3-6b-scam-in-south-africa/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt investors push for charges against Cajee brothers — TechCentral","type":"news_article","url":"https://techcentral.co.za/africrypt-investors-push-for-charges-against-cajee-brothers/206356/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"AfriCrypt founders vanish with nearly $4 billion — TechCabal","type":"news_article","url":"https://techcabal.com/2021/06/24/africrypt-founders-vanish-with-nearly-4-billion-in-south-africa-cryptocurrency-scam/"}]},{"content":"Following the platform's collapse, Swiss authorities opened criminal proceedings against the Cajee brothers through the Public Prosecutor's Office III of the Canton of Zurich on suspicion of money laundering. Investigators discovered the brothers had maintained hardware wallets stored in safety deposit boxes in Zurich. Ameer Cajee was arrested in late 2021 during an alleged attempt to access these safety deposit boxes. He was held in pretrial detention for approximately six months before being released on bail of approximately 300,000 Swiss francs. His challenges to bail conditions requiring him to remain in Switzerland were rejected by Switzerland's Federal Supreme Court. Reports from 2025 indicated that Swiss prosecutors later withdrew the money laundering case against Ameer Cajee; legal observers suggested this followed the withdrawal of key investor complaints tied to settlement agreements, though the Zurich Public Prosecutor's Office maintained limited public transparency about the matter.","heading":"Swiss Criminal Investigation","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"The Unraveling of Africrypt: South Africa's Bitcoin Ponzi Scheme Reaches Swiss Shores — Satori News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.satorinews.com/articles/2025-02-14/the-unraveling-of-africrypt-south-africas-bitcoin-ponzi-scheme-reaches-swiss-shores-549805"},{"credibility":2,"name":"South African scammers behind Africrypt being investigated in Switzerland — Crypto.news","type":"news_article","url":"https://crypto.news/south-african-scammers-behind-africrypt-being-investigated-in-switzerland/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Bitcoin Brothers Raees and Ameer Cajee Investigated in Switzerland — Under Coverist","type":"news_article","url":"https://undercoverist.org/bitcoin-brothers-raees-and-ameer-cajee-investigated-in-switzerland/"}]},{"content":"Investor attorney Sean Peirce of Coast to Coast Special Investigations stated publicly that investors were pursuing charges of fraud, theft, and money laundering against the brothers, with potential sentences of 10 to 15 years. A complicating factor arose when it emerged that many investors had signed agreements transferring their claims to Pennython Project Management, a Dubai-registered firm, in exchange for approximately 70 cents on the dollar (61 cents per rand). Africrypt attorney Rashaad Moosa indicated that investors who signed these agreements may have forfeited the right to pursue civil or criminal proceedings independently. An investor allegedly claiming losses of approximately $50 million retained a separate legal team, with reports as of early 2026 indicating that legal papers had still not been served on the Cajee brothers.","heading":"Investor Civil Proceedings and Settlement Disputes","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt investors push for charges against Cajee brothers — TechCentral","type":"news_article","url":"https://techcentral.co.za/africrypt-investors-push-for-charges-against-cajee-brothers/206356/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Burned Africrypt Bitcoin Investors Push Charges Despite Mystery Payouts — Bloomberg","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-03/burned-africrypt-investors-push-charges-despite-mystery-payouts"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt: How investors were fleeced and left high and dry — Daily Maverick","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-04-14-africrypt-how-investors-were-fleeced-and-left-high-and-dry/"}]},{"content":"As of February 2026, South African investigative television program Carte Blanche reported that Raees and Ameer Cajee had quietly returned to South Africa and were residing at the gated Zimbali Estate in KwaZulu-Natal, with additional ties traced to Umhlanga and Johannesburg. Journalists were unable to make direct contact with the brothers. No formal criminal charges had been filed against the brothers in South Africa as of the time of reporting. Despite the Hawks investigation and NPA engagement, no arrest warrants had been publicly issued. The brothers retain private security at their residence. A lawyer representing a major investor stated: 'They can protect themselves. They've got security. Because they have money.'","heading":"Return to South Africa and Current Status (2026)","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt Founders Return to South Africa After Years in Hiding — CoinTelegraph","type":"news_article","url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-brothers-return-south-africa-africrypt-cajee-carte-blanche"},{"credibility":2,"name":"South Africa's 'Bitcoin Brothers' Return Years After Africrypt Collapse — FinanceFeeds","type":"news_article","url":"https://financefeeds.com/south-africas-bitcoin-brothers-return-years-after-africrypt-collapse/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"AfriCrypt's 'Bitcoin Brothers' Reportedly Back in South Africa — BitcoinKE","type":"news_article","url":"https://bitcoinke.io/2026/02/africrypt-bitcoin-brothers-reportedly-back-in-south-africa/"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":1,"name":"South Africa Africrypt Bitcoin Scam?: Cajee Brothers Missing Along With Billions — Bloomberg","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-06-23/s-african-brothers-vanish-and-so-does-3-6-billion-in-bitcoin"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Burned Africrypt Bitcoin Investors Push Charges Despite Mystery Payouts — Bloomberg","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-03/burned-africrypt-investors-push-charges-despite-mystery-payouts"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt: How investors were fleeced and left high and dry — Daily Maverick","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-04-14-africrypt-how-investors-were-fleeced-and-left-high-and-dry/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Africrypt files, Part 2 — The Cajee brothers' escape plan — Daily Maverick","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-05-18-the-africrypt-files-part-2-the-cajee-brothers-escape-plan/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt founders under probe over $3.6B scam in South Africa — CoinGeek","type":"news_article","url":"https://coingeek.com/africrypt-founders-under-probe-over-3-6b-scam-in-south-africa/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"South Africa BTC scam Africrypt makes off with $3.8B, asks victims not to report — CoinGeek","type":"news_article","url":"https://coingeek.com/south-africa-btc-scam-africrypt-makes-off-with-3-8b-asks-victims-not-to-report/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Cajee Brothers Deny $3.6 Billion Bitcoin Fraud — BankInfoSecurity","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/cajee-brothers-deny-36-billion-bitcoin-fraud-a-16950"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt investors push for charges against Cajee brothers — TechCentral","type":"news_article","url":"https://techcentral.co.za/africrypt-investors-push-for-charges-against-cajee-brothers/206356/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Unraveling of Africrypt: South Africa's Bitcoin Ponzi Scheme Reaches Swiss Shores — Satori News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.satorinews.com/articles/2025-02-14/the-unraveling-of-africrypt-south-africas-bitcoin-ponzi-scheme-reaches-swiss-shores-549805"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt Founders Return to South Africa After Years in Hiding — CoinTelegraph","type":"news_article","url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-brothers-return-south-africa-africrypt-cajee-carte-blanche"},{"credibility":2,"name":"South African scammers behind Africrypt being investigated in Switzerland — Crypto.news","type":"news_article","url":"https://crypto.news/south-african-scammers-behind-africrypt-being-investigated-in-switzerland/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"South Africa's 'Bitcoin Brothers' Return Years After Africrypt Collapse — FinanceFeeds","type":"news_article","url":"https://financefeeds.com/south-africas-bitcoin-brothers-return-years-after-africrypt-collapse/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"AfriCrypt founders vanish with nearly $4 billion in South Africa cryptocurrency scam — TechCabal","type":"news_article","url":"https://techcabal.com/2021/06/24/africrypt-founders-vanish-with-nearly-4-billion-in-south-africa-cryptocurrency-scam/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Africrypt Founders Return to South Africa After Years in Hiding — Africrypt founders back in South Africa — TradingView/CoinTelegraph","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tradingview.com/news/cointelegraph:82726ff33094b:0-africrypt-founders-back-in-south-africa-years-after-platform-collapse-report/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"AfriCrypt's Bitcoin Brothers Reportedly Back in South Africa — BitcoinKE","type":"news_article","url":"https://bitcoinke.io/2026/02/africrypt-bitcoin-brothers-reportedly-back-in-south-africa/"}],"summary":"Africrypt was a South African cryptocurrency investment platform founded in 2019 by brothers Raees and Ameer Cajee. In April 2021, the platform abruptly shut down following an alleged hack, after which the founders fled South Africa with investor funds. The case became one of the most prominent alleged cryptocurrency exit scams in African history, though the exact amount lost remains disputed.","timeline":[{"date":"2019-01-01","event":"Africrypt founded by brothers Raees and Ameer Cajee in South Africa; platform promises daily returns of up to 10% through alleged algorithmic trading","source":"Daily Maverick","source_url":"https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-04-14-africrypt-how-investors-were-fleeced-and-left-high-and-dry/"},{"date":"2021-04-13","event":"Africrypt investors receive email claiming the platform was hacked; investors are told not to report the incident to authorities or lawyers","source":"CoinGeek","source_url":"https://coingeek.com/south-africa-btc-scam-africrypt-makes-off-with-3-8b-asks-victims-not-to-report/"},{"date":"2021-04-01","event":"Hanekom Attorneys, retained by investors, discovers 69,000 BTC moved from Africrypt wallets through dark web tumblers and mixers; both Cajee brothers leave South Africa","source":"BankInfoSecurity","source_url":"https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/cajee-brothers-deny-36-billion-bitcoin-fraud-a-16950"},{"date":"2021-06-23","event":"Bloomberg publishes story on Africrypt collapse, reporting $3.6 billion in Bitcoin missing alongside the Cajee brothers","source":"Bloomberg","source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-06-23/s-african-brothers-vanish-and-so-does-3-6-billion-in-bitcoin"},{"date":"2021-06-24","event":"FSCA issues public statement confirming it cannot take regulatory action against Africrypt as cryptocurrency is not a regulated financial product under South African law","source":"TechCabal","source_url":"https://techcabal.com/2021/06/24/africrypt-founders-vanish-with-nearly-4-billion-in-south-africa-cryptocurrency-scam/"},{"date":"2021-07-01","event":"South Gauteng High Court grants provisional liquidation order against the Cajee brothers; brothers given until July 19, 2021 to contest","source":"TechCentral","source_url":"https://techcentral.co.za/africrypt-investors-push-for-charges-against-cajee-brothers/206356/"},{"date":"2021-11-01","event":"Ameer Cajee arrested in Zurich, Switzerland while allegedly attempting to access safety deposit boxes containing hardware wallets; held in pretrial detention for approximately six months","source":"Satori News","source_url":"https://www.satorinews.com/articles/2025-02-14/the-unraveling-of-africrypt-south-africas-bitcoin-ponzi-scheme-reaches-swiss-shores-549805"},{"date":"2022-01-03","event":"Bloomberg reports investors pushing charges despite mystery partial payouts via Pennython Project Management (Dubai); many investors had signed agreements forfeiting independent legal claims","source":"Bloomberg","source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-03/burned-africrypt-investors-push-charges-despite-mystery-payouts"},{"date":"2022-06-01","event":"Ameer Cajee released from Swiss pretrial detention on bail of approximately 300,000 CHF; bail conditions requiring him to remain in Switzerland upheld by Switzerland's Federal Supreme Court on appeal","source":"Satori News","source_url":"https://www.satorinews.com/articles/2025-02-14/the-unraveling-of-africrypt-south-africas-bitcoin-ponzi-scheme-reaches-swiss-shores-549805"},{"date":"2025-02-14","event":"Reports confirm Swiss prosecutors investigated the brothers for money laundering but that the case against Ameer Cajee was subsequently withdrawn, reportedly after investor complaints tied to settlement agreements were withdrawn","source":"Satori News","source_url":"https://www.satorinews.com/articles/2025-02-14/the-unraveling-of-africrypt-south-africas-bitcoin-ponzi-scheme-reaches-swiss-shores-549805"},{"date":"2026-02-17","event":"South African TV program Carte Blanche reveals the Cajee brothers have quietly returned to South Africa and are residing at the gated Zimbali Estate in KwaZulu-Natal; no criminal charges have been filed in South Africa","source":"CoinTelegraph","source_url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-brothers-return-south-africa-africrypt-cajee-carte-blanche"}]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 8a7be0d5-dafb-4144-95d8-59cd6507f477copy
2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-05-06 02:50:04Z
   Score: 2 → 2 (no score change)
   The Africrypt investigation is broadly well-sourced and accurate on its core claims about the platform's founding, collapse, Swiss investigation, and current status of the Cajee brothers. Two claims are disputed: the MTI loss figure ($1.2B stated vs. $1.7B per CFTC) and the verified Africrypt loss range ($40-50M stated vs. R3.6 billion per court-appointed liquidators). One claim about Brandon Topham's specific statement is unverifiable from cited sources. Sean Peirce is misidentified as an attorney rather than a private investigator.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 417,878,502

   sig

   4eMxTQ7WNaM2…FfL5VBf9copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   4ChadA2KRe1v…3mAqJtC6copysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (882 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-06T02:50:04.027Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"d7426dad-d70b-49a5-b017-96ca5a2b3bc2","new_score":2,"page_slug":"africrypt","prev_score":2,"reason":"The Africrypt investigation is broadly well-sourced and accurate on its core claims about the platform's founding, collapse, Swiss investigation, and current status of the Cajee brothers. Two claims are disputed: the MTI loss figure ($1.2B stated vs. $1.7B per CFTC) and the verified Africrypt loss range ($40-50M stated vs. R3.6 billion per court-appointed liquidators). One claim about Brandon Topham's specific statement is unverifiable from cited sources. Sean Peirce is misidentified as an attorney rather than a private investigator.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 6725a2f2-0737-44b5-803c-4add5b4d1ccecopy
3. #3review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-05-06 02:50:04Z
   Score: 2 → 0 (-5)
   The investigation is broadly accurate with 20 of 28 claims confirmed and strong sourcing from tier-1 and tier-2 outlets. Two disputed claims require correction: the MTI loss figure should be $1.7B per CFTC (not $1.2B), and the verified Africrypt loss range of $40-50M is contradicted by court-appointed liquidator findings of R3.6 billion. The loss understatement is the more material issue but is partially mitigated by the investigation already presenting the $3.6B Bloomberg figure and noting the amount is contested. High-priority coverage gaps around Vanuatu passports and liquidator-confirmed losses should be addressed in revision.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 417,878,505

   sig

   2EiBNewxiHMj…C7HHTCZscopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   8MsjqApY2Brd…vnN3XRZRcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (986 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-06T02:50:04.027Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"d7426dad-d70b-49a5-b017-96ca5a2b3bc2","new_score":0,"page_slug":"africrypt","prev_score":2,"reason":"The investigation is broadly accurate with 20 of 28 claims confirmed and strong sourcing from tier-1 and tier-2 outlets. Two disputed claims require correction: the MTI loss figure should be $1.7B per CFTC (not $1.2B), and the verified Africrypt loss range of $40-50M is contradicted by court-appointed liquidator findings of R3.6 billion. The loss understatement is the more material issue but is partially mitigated by the investigation already presenting the $3.6B Bloomberg figure and noting the amount is contested. High-priority coverage gaps around Vanuatu passports and liquidator-confirmed losses should be addressed in revision.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision e34498f5-5162-4fe4-9d9d-f2a5a272da1ecopy
4. #4reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-05-13 23:45:41Z
   Score: 0 → 0 (no score change)
   The Africrypt investigation page is broadly accurate on major facts: the April 2021 collapse, investor email content, blockchain analysis findings, Swiss arrest, bail conditions, settlement structure, and the brothers' 2026 return to South Africa. Key factual errors include: (1) Ameer Cajee is labeled 'CEO' but was COO — Raees was CEO; (2) the age assignment at founding appears reversed and conflates founding-era ages with collapse-era ages; (3) the liquidation order timeline date (July 1) is incorrect — the order was granted approximately April 26, 2021; (4) the claim that Swiss prosecutors withdrew the money laundering case is unverifiable from available sources. The disputed $3.6 billion vs. $40-50 million loss figure is handled appropriately as an open question.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 419,572,067

   sig

   53JPtufgKZes…fpamkMnkcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   2EkocaLgbLco…Z5mtuvgXcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1119 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-13T23:45:40.981Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"d7426dad-d70b-49a5-b017-96ca5a2b3bc2","new_score":0,"page_slug":"africrypt","prev_score":0,"reason":"The Africrypt investigation page is broadly accurate on major facts: the April 2021 collapse, investor email content, blockchain analysis findings, Swiss arrest, bail conditions, settlement structure, and the brothers' 2026 return to South Africa. Key factual errors include: (1) Ameer Cajee is labeled 'CEO' but was COO — Raees was CEO; (2) the age assignment at founding appears reversed and conflates founding-era ages with collapse-era ages; (3) the liquidation order timeline date (July 1) is incorrect — the order was granted approximately April 26, 2021; (4) the claim that Swiss prosecutors withdrew the money laundering case is unverifiable from available sources. The disputed $3.6 billion vs. $40-50 million loss figure is handled appropriately as an open question.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision ff05100e-958d-44f0-9ce8-0bf67ae540fccopy
5. #5review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-05-13 23:45:41Z
   Score: 0 → 0 (-10)
   The Africrypt page is substantially accurate on core narrative facts: the 2019 founding, April 2021 collapse, investor email, blockchain analysis findings, Swiss arrest, bail conditions, settlement mechanism, and 2026 return to South Africa are all confirmed by credible sources. However, three factual errors require correction: claim_findings[1] reverses the age assignment (Raees was ~20 not 17; Ameer was ~17 not 20 at founding) and conflates founding with collapse timelines; claim_findings[5] incorrectly labels Ameer as 'CEO' when he was COO (Raees was CEO); timeline[5] dates the liquidation order grant to July 1, 2021 when sources indicate April 26, 2021 (July 19 was the contest deadline). Additionally, the claim that Swiss prosecutors withdrew the money laundering case (claim_findings[22]) is unverifiable in the cited sources. Two high-priority coverage gaps (on-chain forensics verification and current legal status updates) suggest expansion, not denial. Reviewer confidence of 0.78 supports a measured penalty.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 419,572,073

   sig

   fzD99RMHURgM…zCNTKchwcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   FcEgwPBhUnfu…anP4UYDYcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1377 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-13T23:45:40.981Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"d7426dad-d70b-49a5-b017-96ca5a2b3bc2","new_score":0,"page_slug":"africrypt","prev_score":0,"reason":"The Africrypt page is substantially accurate on core narrative facts: the 2019 founding, April 2021 collapse, investor email, blockchain analysis findings, Swiss arrest, bail conditions, settlement mechanism, and 2026 return to South Africa are all confirmed by credible sources. However, three factual errors require correction: claim_findings[1] reverses the age assignment (Raees was ~20 not 17; Ameer was ~17 not 20 at founding) and conflates founding with collapse timelines; claim_findings[5] incorrectly labels Ameer as 'CEO' when he was COO (Raees was CEO); timeline[5] dates the liquidation order grant to July 1, 2021 when sources indicate April 26, 2021 (July 19 was the contest deadline). Additionally, the claim that Swiss prosecutors withdrew the money laundering case (claim_findings[22]) is unverifiable in the cited sources. Two high-priority coverage gaps (on-chain forensics verification and current legal status updates) suggest expansion, not denial. Reviewer confidence of 0.78 supports a measured penalty.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision c9ec0b41-adc7-4205-80a1-93255f5a5eafcopy
6. #6reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-06-03 04:20:59Z
   Score: 0 → 0 (no score change)
   The Africrypt page is broadly accurate on the key facts of the collapse, regulatory response, Swiss investigation, and 2026 return. However, it contains two notable factual errors: the ages of the Cajee brothers are reversed (Raees was 20, not 17, at founding; Ameer was 17, not 20), and Ameer Cajee's title is incorrectly given as CEO (he was COO; Raees was CEO). More significantly, the claim that Swiss prosecutors withdrew the money laundering case against Ameer Cajee is not supported by any found sources — the most recent authoritative reporting (May 2025, Daily Maverick) states proceedings were continuing. The Bloomberg URLs return HTTP 403 paywalls rather than dead links. Timeline dates for two entries are imprecise or incorrect.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 423,953,172

   sig

   24MKMdoJKNBE…1YYacUM9copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   4jeDorkYJnw8…G3RA437fcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1085 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-03T04:20:59.140Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"d7426dad-d70b-49a5-b017-96ca5a2b3bc2","new_score":0,"page_slug":"africrypt","prev_score":0,"reason":"The Africrypt page is broadly accurate on the key facts of the collapse, regulatory response, Swiss investigation, and 2026 return. However, it contains two notable factual errors: the ages of the Cajee brothers are reversed (Raees was 20, not 17, at founding; Ameer was 17, not 20), and Ameer Cajee's title is incorrectly given as CEO (he was COO; Raees was CEO). More significantly, the claim that Swiss prosecutors withdrew the money laundering case against Ameer Cajee is not supported by any found sources — the most recent authoritative reporting (May 2025, Daily Maverick) states proceedings were continuing. The Bloomberg URLs return HTTP 403 paywalls rather than dead links. Timeline dates for two entries are imprecise or incorrect.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision c054d94c-850d-40ad-9737-8cb3802aefe7copy
7. #7review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-06-03 04:20:59Z
   Score: 0 → 0 (-12)
   The reviewer confirmed 20 of 31 claims and found 3 disputed across 31 total, placing disputed_pct at 12.9%. Two of the three disputed claims are factual errors in named-person attributes: claim_findings[1] reverses the Cajee brothers' ages at founding (Raees was approximately 20, Ameer approximately 17 — contradicted by three independent sources), and claim_findings[6] misidentifies Ameer Cajee as CEO when he was COO, an error that appears in the page's severity-critical section. The third and most significant dispute is claim_findings[24]: the page asserts Swiss prosecutors withdrew the money laundering case against Ameer Cajee, but this claim is contradicted by three Tier 2 sources including a May 2025 Daily Maverick investigation that explicitly states proceedings were 'continuing' — no credible source was found confirming case withdrawal. The page also carries two imprecise timeline dates (timeline[2] and timeline[5]) flagged as partially supported. Reviewer confidence is 0.82 and no link rot was found. The page requires targeted corrections to the three disputed claims and the two timeline dates before these findings are resolved.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 423,953,182

   sig

   5JPDXWaGsbQz…s2DyyvCLcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   BeHodqH8g6Zv…dmzDc4hjcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1502 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-03T04:20:59.140Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"d7426dad-d70b-49a5-b017-96ca5a2b3bc2","new_score":0,"page_slug":"africrypt","prev_score":0,"reason":"The reviewer confirmed 20 of 31 claims and found 3 disputed across 31 total, placing disputed_pct at 12.9%. Two of the three disputed claims are factual errors in named-person attributes: claim_findings[1] reverses the Cajee brothers' ages at founding (Raees was approximately 20, Ameer approximately 17 — contradicted by three independent sources), and claim_findings[6] misidentifies Ameer Cajee as CEO when he was COO, an error that appears in the page's severity-critical section. The third and most significant dispute is claim_findings[24]: the page asserts Swiss prosecutors withdrew the money laundering case against Ameer Cajee, but this claim is contradicted by three Tier 2 sources including a May 2025 Daily Maverick investigation that explicitly states proceedings were 'continuing' — no credible source was found confirming case withdrawal. The page also carries two imprecise timeline dates (timeline[2] and timeline[5]) flagged as partially supported. Reviewer confidence is 0.82 and no link rot was found. The page requires targeted corrections to the three disputed claims and the two timeline dates before these findings are resolved.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":7,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 331a27e9-e8a2-4c28-8d87-28b4f8df2d81copy