Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Africrypt
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 419572067
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-13T23:45:41.171Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 2EkocaLgbLcoREjSfYj3fYyU3hmBcynR9HdnZ5mtuvgX
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1119 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-13T23:45:40.981Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"d7426dad-d70b-49a5-b017-96ca5a2b3bc2","new_score":0,"page_slug":"africrypt","prev_score":0,"reason":"The Africrypt investigation page is broadly accurate on major facts: the April 2021 collapse, investor email content, blockchain analysis findings, Swiss arrest, bail conditions, settlement structure, and the brothers' 2026 return to South Africa. Key factual errors include: (1) Ameer Cajee is labeled 'CEO' but was COO — Raees was CEO; (2) the age assignment at founding appears reversed and conflates founding-era ages with collapse-era ages; (3) the liquidation order timeline date (July 1) is incorrect — the order was granted approximately April 26, 2021; (4) the claim that Swiss prosecutors withdrew the money laundering case is unverifiable from available sources. The disputed $3.6 billion vs. $40-50 million loss figure is handled appropriately as an open question.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}