Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-29T17:14:49.529Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"6e148e7d-3998-498d-9b16-c35d8534284f","new_score":0,"page_slug":"verus-ethereum-bridge","prev_score":8,"reason":"The core exploit facts — attack date, asset amounts, attacker addresses, technical root cause in checkCCEValues, and Blockaid detection — are confirmed across multiple credible sources including Tier 1 outlets and Halborn's post-mortem. However, claim_findings[17] (sections[2]) is explicitly disputed: the page states 'all stolen proceeds were subsequently moved through Tornado Cash,' but contemporaneous sources show funds were not yet laundered at reporting time, and by May 22, 2026 approximately 75% of funds (4,052 ETH) were returned to the Verus team via a negotiated bounty deal. This overstatement is corroborated in the summary section as well (claim_findings[3], partially_supported). Additionally, four claims are stale — all concentrated in the 'Team Response' section — because the page repeatedly asserts the Verus team issued no public statement and no bounty existed, both of which are directly contradicted by documented May 22 events. These gaps are rated high-priority by the reviewer. The Kelp DAO figure ($293M vs confirmed $292M) is a minor numerical inaccuracy. No link rot was found.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}