Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · 1inch
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 38 → 62 (+24)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426514410
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-14T23:15:54.978Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- H4R8G5sYnHNR5X4PuvHMyHrkuzBLgRXDgjJxvLKPmuVp
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1188 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:15:54.866Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"a4cc3a16-a934-40c9-8117-a05d45a1f6fd","new_score":62,"page_slug":"1inch","prev_score":38,"reason":"All six claim findings (claim_findings[0] through claim_findings[5]) are fully supported with 0% disputed. The review establishes that 1inch is a legitimate, non-custodial DEX aggregator with 60%+ EVM market share and 15+ top-tier security audits. Every incident driving the current WARNING score (38) is attributable to third-party supply-chain compromise, deprecated contracts operated by independent resolvers, or partner-side breaches explicitly disavowed by 1inch — none involve 1inch fraud or self-dealing. The current score miscategorizes a victim/bystander as a perpetrator; the reviewer-recommended score of 62 (CAUTIONARY) correctly reflects material but non-fraudulent operational caveats. Score is adjusted upward by +24 to reach the recommended CAUTIONARY band. Page content stands as accurate and published status is unchanged.","score_delta":24,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}