Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T10:55:20.498Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"e92fd795-e2ee-4446-aae1-5a25cc8aaeca","new_score":36,"page_slug":"cod3x","prev_score":48,"reason":"Independent verification found 23.3% of the page's checkable claims (7 of 30: 4 disputed, 3 unverifiable) to be disputed or unverifiable, which falls in the middle of the range calling for correction rather than removal. The most consequential problems are a security-audit date the page's own cited audit log contradicts — it credits Reaper Farm with a CertiK audit 'prior to' the August 2022 exploit, when that audit is dated three months after it (claim_findings[4]) — and an exploit-loss figure for Ionic Money that reports only the laundered portion ($3.2M) as the total, when the same cited sources report total losses of $6.9-8.6 million (claim_findings[7]). The page also incorrectly states that no major exchange has listed the token, when Coinbase, MEXC, Bybit and LBank all show active listings (claim_findings[14]), and a market-cap ratio claim conflicts with supply figures printed elsewhere on the same page (claim_findings[13]). Three of the seven disputed/unverifiable findings trace to sources that could not be fetched during review rather than to confirmed inaccuracies, and the reviewer's own confidence was moderate (0.72), both of which argue against the harsher end of this band; a high-priority gap in on-chain treasury analysis was also flagged but does not change the outcome at this disputed-claim rate.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}