Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_revise · Internet Computer
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
3826 (-12)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
419482343
Off-chain at
2026-05-13T13:48:03.561Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
6EF963rU32ci6YTzThRwNenm87eBsNLW8PK4h8BJmKBG
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1937 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-13T13:48:03.412Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"7464bbaa-7441-4e83-b3cc-f24c6ed145fe","new_score":26,"page_slug":"internet-computer","prev_score":38,"reason":"The review found 3 directly disputed claims in 29 total (17%), placing this page in the minor-issues band. However, two of the specific errors carry disproportionate weight: claim_findings[6] states the Arkham Intelligence report identified '44 wallet addresses' when the cited Tier 1 source explicitly identifies 35 addresses — this numerical error sits in the critical-severity section that is the factual core of the investigation. Separately, claim_findings[11] incorrectly attributes the time-bar ruling to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 when the Paul Weiss Tier 1 legal memo confirms the claims were under the Securities Act of 1933 — a legally meaningful distinction in a critical-severity section. Additional issues requiring correction include: the Mission 70 NNS vote is dated to January 2026 (whitepaper publication) when the governance vote occurred in April 2026 (claim_findings[17]); CanisterWorm is dated to 2025 when reporting places the campaign in early 2026; the circulating supply figure of 527 million is outdated by approximately 25 million tokens; and Dominic Williams' degree is attributed to UCL when his own public profile confirms King's College London (claim_findings[19]). Three high-priority coverage gaps — post-April 2025 amended complaint status, absence of SEC/CFTC regulatory engagement coverage, and reliance on a single firm for insider wallet attribution — further support revision over approval. Core claims about the token collapse magnitude, litigation dismissal outcome, funding rounds, and market data ranges are broadly accurate.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}