Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Vesper Finance
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 62 → 62 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464459954
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T10:21:44.546Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T10:21:59.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T10:21:59.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- EhomAn59dSV11s5ccus1aGAmd8asbo8iCjPFTwZ4NHed
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2402 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"3626b18a04da02cf5705fb1196ae3aa3","band_override":{"actual_delta":-28,"actual_verdict":"review_revise","disputed_pct":0.6,"expected_delta_range":[-50,-30],"expected_verdict":"review_deny","rationale":"Three of the five checkable claims (60%) were disputed: the Dedaub rebase vulnerability and the Immunefi bounty are dated 2023 on the page, but Immunefi's own write-up places them in 2021 (claim_findings[0], [1], [2]). The Sonne remediation is described as a governance approval, yet the cited thread is only a discussion (claim_findings[3]). The core November 2021 exploit narrative was confirmed against an independent source (claim_findings[4]), and no shutdown or omission was found. Because the errors are mostly date mistakes rather than false core allegations, and the reviewer's confidence is moderate, the page is revised rather than denied. One TVL claim could not be checked because the source blocked the reviewer, which is a coverage limit rather than a defect of the page."},"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T10:21:44.296Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.6,"investigation_id":"d91b85b1-e27d-487b-8210-6e5276e87204","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":62,"page_slug":"vesper-finance","prev_score":62,"reason":"Three of the five checkable claims (60%) were disputed: the Dedaub rebase vulnerability and the Immunefi bounty are dated 2023 on the page, but Immunefi's own write-up places them in 2021 (claim_findings[0], [1], [2]). The Sonne remediation is described as a governance approval, yet the cited thread is only a discussion (claim_findings[3]). The core November 2021 exploit narrative was confirmed against an independent source (claim_findings[4]), and no shutdown or omission was found. Because the errors are mostly date mistakes rather than false core allegations, and the reviewer's confidence is moderate, the page is revised rather than denied. One TVL claim could not be checked because the source blocked the reviewer, which is a coverage limit rather than a defect of the page.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":5,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}