Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · PiggyBank Protocol
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
32 → 32 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
425571475
Off-chain at
2026-06-10T15:19:10.809Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
DwHZNSrU7RG9C5u57gL9GazXSbgg3XnwZ2bpxtGcnnSx
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1341 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-10T15:19:10.638Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"4832d100-6f44-4d70-a8be-ebdc596fc278","new_score":32,"page_slug":"piggybank-protocol","prev_score":32,"reason":"The investigation page is well-sourced and factually accurate across its core claims. The LAB incident details, ZachXBT's specific allegations, vault drawdown figures, Drift hack facts, and team anonymity claims are all independently confirmed by credible news sources. The three partially_supported findings relate to minor overstatements: the Formal Land auditor description ('associated with Tezos and Nomadic Labs' overstates what is an independent contractor relationship), the withdrawal epoch description (ambiguous about total wait time versus epoch length), and the $188K net performance figure and detailed USDC vault strategy parameters (not independently verifiable from the sources available). One claim (the ten-DEX, 5x-leverage USDC strategy specifics) is unverifiable from available sources. A minor timeline inaccuracy exists: the LAB TGE date is listed as October 1 but was October 14, 2025. No claims were found to be disputed or contradicted by more credible sources.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}