Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Adam Iza
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
0 → 0 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
425435246
Off-chain at
2026-06-10T00:19:35.373Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
GKVmjBf7Zf3ATdUNRZ3vma44BmyJqiSDMdbbHHJEEH98
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (991 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-10T00:19:35.295Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"e6a552fd-77b7-4147-a3c5-bddbb3b71daf","new_score":0,"page_slug":"adam-iza","prev_score":0,"reason":"The page is substantially accurate. Core facts — guilty pleas, charge details, dollar figures, dates, and named individuals — are confirmed by IRS CI and DOJ primary sources and corroborated by multiple credible news outlets. The two most significant issues are: (1) the page omits LASD deputy Michael David Coberg entirely, who is the deputy directly responsible for the $127,000 extortion cited in the text; and (2) the status of Saif Faiq as 'not guilty' is now stale, as he pleaded guilty on or around June 9, 2026. A minor date ambiguity exists around the Connecticut guilty plea (June 1 vs. June 2, 2026), with most sources pointing to June 1.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}