Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Raydium Protocol
- Sequence
- #5
- Score
- 55 → 47 (-8)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425189976
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-08T21:13:58.533Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 4wfsvZdTjaWTU3vhPpaunn416Um6s79Lfjh942Liqoaz
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1538 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-08T21:13:58.147Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"ef74b3d0-4fed-4f79-a9d6-19255b26afae","new_score":47,"page_slug":"raydium","prev_score":55,"reason":"The page is well-sourced on core historical claims — the December 2022 exploit mechanics, compensation plan, and incident response are confirmed across Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. However, four factual issues require correction before the page can be approved. First, claim_findings[32] (market share contraction from 23.5% to 10.5% in Q3 2025) is directly disputed by two independent sources that show a net quarterly increase rather than a contraction — this is the most significant error. Second, claim_findings[3] (RAY price ~$0.72, market cap ~$192M) is stale by approximately 20% relative to June 2026 market data. Third, claim_findings[30] incorrectly identifies the United Kingdom as a restricted jurisdiction when Raydium's official disclaimer does not list it. Fourth, claim_findings[26] overstates Pump.fun's revenue contribution as 'nearly half' when independent sources place it at 36-41%. A minor unacknowledged discrepancy between Raydium's self-reported $4.4M loss (claim_findings[8]) and third-party estimates of $5.5M also warrants a disclosure note. All corrections are factual updates to existing content; the underlying page structure and sourcing quality remain strong.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}