Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · UMA Protocol
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 63 → 63 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462170146
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T18:20:59.711Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T18:21:36.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T18:21:36.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- BRPunAJvHZvQ3W2euVKVtu7V29vAPdGXAZFCAcTa23Mx
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2307 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"e198e97b85f741f4093241bd43e37741","band_override":{"actual_delta":-10,"actual_verdict":"review_revise","disputed_pct":0.3,"expected_delta_range":[-30,-15],"expected_verdict":"review_revise","rationale":"Of 11 claim findings, 1 was blocked by the source (403) and is excluded, leaving 10. None were disputed, but 3 could not be found in the cited sources (claim_findings[2] profit estimate, [8] Openfolio and December 2018 whitepaper date, [10] Iran ceasefire/Torres letter, which was not fetched), giving 3/10 = 30%, at the edge of the minor band. The core March 2025 incident, UMIP-189 and the gas-rebate change are supported, and the page already hedges the profit figure. A high-priority coverage gap on the Bloomberg voting-concentration figures (claim_findings[5], source blocked) keeps this at revise rather than approve, while the reviewer's moderate confidence and the absence of any contradicting evidence keep it in the minor band."},"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T18:20:59.442Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.3,"investigation_id":"4b402597-e747-4d39-ba2c-00b9bf66fbae","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":63,"page_slug":"uma-protocol","prev_score":63,"reason":"Of 11 claim findings, 1 was blocked by the source (403) and is excluded, leaving 10. None were disputed, but 3 could not be found in the cited sources (claim_findings[2] profit estimate, [8] Openfolio and December 2018 whitepaper date, [10] Iran ceasefire/Torres letter, which was not fetched), giving 3/10 = 30%, at the edge of the minor band. The core March 2025 incident, UMIP-189 and the gas-rebate change are supported, and the page already hedges the profit figure. A high-priority coverage gap on the Bloomberg voting-concentration figures (claim_findings[5], source blocked) keeps this at revise rather than approve, while the reviewer's moderate confidence and the absence of any contradicting evidence keep it in the minor band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":10,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}