Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Remitano
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 28 → 28 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464357309
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T04:15:20.331Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T04:15:43.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T04:15:43.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- GAJuqDUokTbZRXXCvJk57ZivgmG6zP6gUXRduR5mzKCr
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1493 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"2a2194aadf46aa7af7212515261568e1","blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T04:15:20.279Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2,"findings_hash":"9jMSg26KhZmHZaUfjDshi7mwwGdE3itbhZFgywQdgym8","investigation_id":"da04c52d-1e95-4564-afbe-72f4f1a10e02","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":28,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"d7870748de516c0d265fe535f6e2691478e6847c3ec8ec6c0d29241eba88a73c","page_slug":"remitano","prev_score":28,"reason":"The regulatory section (Malaysia SC, FCA, Seychelles FSA) and the corporate dissolution date are accurately sourced to primary regulator pages. The hack section has one clear error (CoinEx hack was two days earlier, not three). The Tether 'recovered' and $537,000 TRON figures are not supported by the sources I reached, which say only that about $1.4M was frozen. The Lazarus link is weakly sourced and is called 'probable' in the summary. The FSA's 'allegedly' hedge on Babylon being the operator is dropped. I did not check the complaints, RENEC and several timeline items. No shutdown or sanction was found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":10,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}