Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Raydium Protocol
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
62 → 62 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
424169112
Off-chain at
2026-06-04T04:13:47.988Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
HRodbF2oviPBNbigwMd9jdxbmjGdWNbAoeVUBUmQgx1C
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1127 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-04T04:13:47.885Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"ef74b3d0-4fed-4f79-a9d6-19255b26afae","new_score":62,"page_slug":"raydium","prev_score":62,"reason":"The Raydium investigation page is substantially accurate. Core claims about the December 2022 exploit — attack time, method, admin account address, exploit mechanism, loss amount, response timeline, and compensation plan details — are all confirmed by primary sources. Key partially-supported issues include: the 'nearly half' Pump.fun revenue attribution overstates the full-year 2024 figure (which was approximately 36%); the UK geo-restriction is not clearly confirmed for the main protocol interface; and the CertiK source reports $5.5M stolen versus the page's official $4.4M figure. Two cited URLs are confirmed dead (CoinTelegraph compensation article at docs.raydium.io/claim-portal; Raydium Docs security page), though their substantive claims are confirmed by other sources.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}