Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T09:13:06.482Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"c9a7dafa-e8b7-4f9f-876e-a9516ccf7572","new_score":56,"page_slug":"ylds","prev_score":68,"reason":"The review confirms the page's central and hardest-to-get-right claim — that YLDS is an SEC-registered face-amount certificate (a debt security), not a money-market fund or a conventional stablecoin — against primary SEC filings and independent legal/press sources (claim_findings[2], [4], [5]). All allegation-level content (the 2017 SoFi resignation, the Morpheus Research short-seller claims, the February 2026 data breach) is also confirmed with proper attribution. However, the page's own summary headline labels YLDS a 'stablecoin' while its body correctly calls it a security, a self-contradiction on the product's defining regulatory feature that the reviewer flagged as a high-priority coverage gap (claim_findings[1], coverage_gaps[0]); because the summary is what most readers see first, this outweighs its low place in the raw disputed count. Four disputed findings are all internally detectable errors rather than externally contested facts: three are timeline dates that don't match the issuer's own press releases (claim_findings[27], [28], [29]), and one is an arithmetic self-contradiction describing $540 million as 'up from' a larger $598 million figure the page itself reports elsewhere (claim_findings[30]). A stale partner count paired with a current loan total (claim_findings[13]) compounds the impression of a page that wasn't fully proofread against its own numbers, even though disputed_pct (12.9%) sits in the lower-middle of the minor-issues band and reviewer confidence was high (0.85).","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}