Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · GMX V1 Perps
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 50 → 50 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462187388
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T19:22:04.473Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T19:22:36.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T19:22:36.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- uPNebFPHacAsShw99MGjDfJqbeDnn8dwi3T4ojjsd1t
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1379 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"60392b4c16ad3a37500ed48835564737","decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:22:04.339Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.0909,"findings_hash":"Bs8m2L6XBGA4v4fa1v8nkUDQAKoFbnexa8g5Dm2Nm6BR","investigation_id":"8429673a-c5b0-46af-a885-ca3107e51347","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":50,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"59b930e696c42c4ccd84b04555788fb4a46790400139f84fb1e6fe96184eb904","page_slug":"gmx-v1-perps","prev_score":50,"reason":"The core narrative holds up: the July 2025 reentrancy exploit of about $42M, the partial return, the September 2022 AVAX manipulation, and V1's shutdown are all supported by the sources I checked. Weaknesses are an unreconciled bounty figure ($4.2M versus the $5M retained), an unsupported inference attributed to Halborn, an unsourced Collider timeline entry, and an out-of-date instruction to GLP holders that omits the August 2025 GLV compensation plan. Team, governance and audit-history sections were not checked in depth.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"shut_down","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}