Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_revise · Adam Iza
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
0 → 0 (-5)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
425435249
Off-chain at
2026-06-10T00:19:35.456Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
EmGTFhKYEC3Ytrdt7vNtTmfDSjJNRjqBTVLwdCYiFt9V
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1211 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-10T00:19:35.295Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"e6a552fd-77b7-4147-a3c5-bddbb3b71daf","new_score":0,"page_slug":"adam-iza","prev_score":0,"reason":"28 of 33 claims are fully confirmed by Tier 1 sources including IRS Criminal Investigation press releases and DOJ press releases. The reviewer's computed disputed_pct of 9% falls within the approve band, but two high-priority coverage gaps prevent approval: (1) claim_findings[17] attributes the $127,000 extortion to unnamed deputies while omitting Michael David Coberg, the specific LASD deputy who pled guilty and was sentenced for this act; and (2) claim_findings[28] is now stale — Saif Faiq, described on the page as having pleaded not guilty, pled guilty on June 9, 2026 per Tier 2 sources found during review. The stale co-defendant status is an active factual error as of publication date. A minor date ambiguity on the Connecticut guilty plea (June 1 vs. June 2) is low-weight and does not affect the verdict. No link rot was found on critical citations.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}