Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Euler Finance
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 58 → 58 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425204259
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-08T22:49:05.964Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- G6ppdrs1sUNJgf8oGabFziNqo43jdZnmahkcuNoSvTzF
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1188 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-08T22:49:05.857Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"04f904e4-8932-42bf-92cb-e7a23d2f99b2","new_score":58,"page_slug":"euler-finance","prev_score":58,"reason":"The Euler Finance investigation page is largely accurate on its major claims — the exploit date, amount, mechanism, fund recovery, attacker alias, and leadership transitions are all confirmed by credible independent sources. Key areas of imprecision include: the V2 audit count (page says '45+' but contemporaneous launch reporting cited 29-31); the TVL '$1.5 billion by early 2025' claim (the peak was late April 2025, and has since receded to ~$273M); the Lazarus Group wallet interaction is misattributed to March 13 (it occurred March 17); and the V1 historical TVL peak of '$323 million' is unverifiable and likely understated based on other sources. A notable gap is the absence of any discussion of the alleged attacker identity (named in at least one security firm's report) and the current sharp TVL decline from the claimed peak.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}