Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Raydium Protocol
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 55 → 55 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425189973
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-08T21:13:58.285Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 2bpyFpK8g5hWyG2xXqfN26dS2i84knYRGkp5Ym7qhKFx
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1200 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-08T21:13:58.147Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"ef74b3d0-4fed-4f79-a9d6-19255b26afae","new_score":55,"page_slug":"raydium","prev_score":55,"reason":"The Raydium investigation page is well-sourced and substantially accurate on core claims about the December 2022 exploit, compensation plan, and protocol history. The most significant factual issue is the Q3 2025 market share contraction claim (23.5% to 10.5%), which is contradicted by multiple sources showing a net quarterly increase. Secondary concerns include: the UK being incorrectly listed as a restricted jurisdiction, RAY price and market cap figures that are ~20% above current June 2026 market data, and the 'nearly half' characterization of Pump.fun's revenue contribution (actual figure is 36–41%). The $4.4M loss figure is Raydium's own self-reported number; third-party analyses cite $5.5M, a discrepancy the page does not acknowledge. Two key cited URLs (Raydium Docs security page and claim-portal archive) returned 404 during this review.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}