Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Superteam
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#4
Score
44 → 44 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
426514277
Off-chain at
2026-06-14T23:15:48.053Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
6BM5JMua7jRqfnd2V8gDFSrAqZS28HSZd3FVkxsuvNxv
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2059 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:15:47.998Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"b2a77313-9c2a-4017-a3c4-ffb6a37a4fad","new_score":44,"page_slug":"superteam","prev_score":44,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Superteam is a well-documented, legitimate Solana ecosystem talent DAO founded in 2021 by Tanmay Bhat and Akshay BD, operating 23+ global chapters and distributing over $1.7M in community GDP. The page's own summary acknowledges no ZachXBT report specifically names Superteam as fraudulent, yet the WARNING band (score 44) implies elevated fraud or unresolved severe incidents. Independent research confirms the DPRK-related incidents cited in the timeline — Favrr, Drift Protocol, ElementalDeFi, Google Cloud warning — are real but involve entirely separate Solana projects being victimized; Superteam is not named in any of them as a participant, victim, or negligent platform. The single social media quote about \"crime on superteam earn\" originates in a thread where the poster explicitly defends Superteam as a neutral marketplace. The Axiom insider trading entry has zero documented connection to Superteam. The score is being driven almost entirely by guilt-by-proximity: Superteam Earn operates in the same sector (Solana job boards) that DPRK workers target, which is a real sector-wide risk but not evidence of entity-level fraud or negligence by Superteam. Under the post-policy band semantics, CAUTIONARY (50-69) requires material caveats and VERIFIED (70-100) requires legitimate entity with no unresolved material issues; the real and legitimate caveat here — that any Solana job board is a DPRK infiltration target — justifies a minor deduction from a clean score, landing around 72 in the VERIFIED band with a note about the sector-wide risk environment.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}