Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Dritan Kapllani Jr.
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 2 → 2 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423080244
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-30T04:05:54.993Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- J4LTzcsLBdqe3gsj9v1qRbc3hS3uZF1WkcQ55F7dYtFc
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1392 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-30T04:05:54.851Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"141dbe93-b5b4-4e8b-a03a-bcfc26ab6fde","new_score":2,"page_slug":"dritan-kapllani-jr","prev_score":2,"reason":"The reviewer found zero disputed claims across 15 verified points, with 12 confirmed and 2 partially supported. The partial support findings do not contradict the page: claim_findings[4] notes that mainstream outlets call the charging document an 'indictment' rather than a 'criminal complaint,' a legal terminology distinction that does not change the case number, district, or Kapllani's CC-1 designation, all of which are confirmed by PACER and Tier 1 outlets. claim_findings[11] flags that specific timestamps (1:10–2:41 AM) and the hardware wallet impersonation vector are granular ZachXBT-sourced details not independently verified in court documents, which is expected given the case's early stage. One accepted submission (ad0966ef) is a 404 with no Wayback preservation, but it is not the sole support for any claim. Two high-priority coverage gaps — the complaint-vs.-indictment document type and staleness of the 'uncharged' status as of May 29 — are noted for future revision but do not undermine current published content.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}