Audit log

Every state-changing event for TypeSol: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-11-01 13:55:30Z
   Score: 40 → 40 (no score change)
   Every checkable claim matches the project's own website, and the page labels them as self-described and unverified. The page claims nothing about the token's on-chain state. No independent coverage or adverse reporting was found. The Solscan page could not be read (403).
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,116,615

   sig

   2VbcJhYQUBkp…73XZ8QGJcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   4MupF7K7E2r6…n8Qf8pZwcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1110 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"e3c88a38718a0c23a26e83dbd53f3fd5","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:55:30.610Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"6fYjhZFDB5HNFBpDPXE49TQfApawopD4Dvq5GP3UPgKh","investigation_id":"714290d2-b12f-4d11-b587-9c67d394355f","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":40,"page_content_hash":"b2edae586144cdc7a0db4ee773934e400cf9076f4241bc1a6a2d4bba9f8b0f19","page_slug":"typesol","prev_score":40,"reason":"Every checkable claim matches the project's own website, and the page labels them as self-described and unverified. The page claims nothing about the token's on-chain state. No independent coverage or adverse reporting was found. The Solscan page could not be read (403).","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":5,"sequence_num":1,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 67c5e57e-905e-4754-a343-49b6bb57f397copy
2. #2review approveby judgejudge

   2026-11-01 13:55:31Z
   Score: 40 → 40 (no score change)
   Five of the six claims checked were confirmed against the project's own website (claim_findings[0,1,2,4,5]), and none were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The sixth (claim_findings[3], the Solscan link) could not be checked because Solscan returned a 403 error. It is left out of the count and is a limit on the review, not a defect of the page. The page labels its statements as self-described, says the token's safety is unassessed, and makes no on-chain claims. The review reports no omissions and no shutdown, exploit or sanction. The open high-priority gap on on-chain token analysis (mint and freeze authority, holder concentration, liquidity) is a suggestion to expand the page. The page already discloses it as unassessed, so it does not change the verdict.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,116,620

   sig

   4GBttPtnSTLS…bBYUNJHkcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   AMJM4vhECr17…Eb69N1Kucopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1461 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"e3c88a38718a0c23a26e83dbd53f3fd5","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:55:30.610Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"714290d2-b12f-4d11-b587-9c67d394355f","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":40,"page_slug":"typesol","prev_score":40,"reason":"Five of the six claims checked were confirmed against the project's own website (claim_findings[0,1,2,4,5]), and none were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The sixth (claim_findings[3], the Solscan link) could not be checked because Solscan returned a 403 error. It is left out of the count and is a limit on the review, not a defect of the page. The page labels its statements as self-described, says the token's safety is unassessed, and makes no on-chain claims. The review reports no omissions and no shutdown, exploit or sanction. The open high-priority gap on on-chain token analysis (mint and freeze authority, holder concentration, liquidity) is a suggestion to expand the page. The page already discloses it as unassessed, so it does not change the verdict.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":5,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 2eaa17d4-9446-4f4c-9d6e-e223ff5de243copy
3. #3reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-11-01 21:35:30Z
   Score: 40 → 40 (no score change)
   The page is carefully hedged and every checkable claim matches typesol.com as fetched today. The Solscan link claim could not be checked because of a 403. The page is thin on independent evidence, which it acknowledges.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,245,371

   sig

   3RZo8wAP2Y1B…FcGA6iNEcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   B5L6nNbYVoj1…PL1QKrSScopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1060 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"47ddd3b4de5ee03c0d81ed32726cdb05","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T21:35:30.426Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"CberU3CoR2gdf8m4LkAym1gVCWuz7mxYXkvRBCpeZvxq","investigation_id":"714290d2-b12f-4d11-b587-9c67d394355f","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":40,"page_content_hash":"b2edae586144cdc7a0db4ee773934e400cf9076f4241bc1a6a2d4bba9f8b0f19","page_slug":"typesol","prev_score":40,"reason":"The page is carefully hedged and every checkable claim matches typesol.com as fetched today. The Solscan link claim could not be checked because of a 403. The page is thin on independent evidence, which it acknowledges.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":5,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision c4374362-85d9-4e2a-bb0e-cbc2a8a1ecfccopy
4. #4review approveby judgejudge

   2026-11-01 21:35:30Z
   Score: 40 → 40 (no score change)
   All five scoreable claims (claim_findings[0], [1], [2], [4], [5]) were confirmed against typesol.com, giving 0% disputed. claim_findings[3] (the Solscan link) was excluded because Solscan returned a 403 to the reviewer, which says nothing about the claim. The review found no omissions and no shutdown, exploit or sanction. The one high-priority coverage gap (on-chain token analysis) is already stated on the page, which says token safety is unassessed, so it points to future expansion and not to a defect.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,245,376

   sig

   3ktsxfHUjvvv…YnNfNs2wcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   HwX6d54xE3vu…3ShGSas7copysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1181 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"47ddd3b4de5ee03c0d81ed32726cdb05","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T21:35:30.426Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"714290d2-b12f-4d11-b587-9c67d394355f","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":40,"page_slug":"typesol","prev_score":40,"reason":"All five scoreable claims (claim_findings[0], [1], [2], [4], [5]) were confirmed against typesol.com, giving 0% disputed. claim_findings[3] (the Solscan link) was excluded because Solscan returned a 403 to the reviewer, which says nothing about the claim. The review found no omissions and no shutdown, exploit or sanction. The one high-priority coverage gap (on-chain token analysis) is already stated on the page, which says token safety is unassessed, so it points to future expansion and not to a defect.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":5,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision a261ca92-bd78-400e-a33f-813ad363726dcopy