Skip to main content
Sign in
Titan Exchange2 decisions on this page

Audit log

Every state-changing event for Titan Exchange: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.

  1. #1reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-05-06 02:50:07Z
    Score: 5858 (no score change)
    The investigation is well-sourced and largely accurate. Key facts about funding, leadership, timeline, and competitive dynamics are confirmed by primary sources. Two notable issues: (1) the 'under 1% market share' claim in the business model section contradicts the investigation's own timeline entry showing 7.3% by March 2026, and (2) Jupiter's fee comparison is oversimplified — the 0.1% fee only applies to Ultra mode, not all swaps. No fraudulent claims were found, and the investigation's cautious framing of self-reported metrics is appropriate.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 417,878,560
    sig
    5DYMxTAtmZxb…PRNhDDJ5explorer ↗
    hash
    9LrJYdPgwZdr…NhzQxLiSsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (902 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-06T02:50:07.413Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"e0bfb0e3-16dc-4c0a-b7f9-b06c45ddd602","new_score":58,"page_slug":"titan-exchange","prev_score":58,"reason":"The investigation is well-sourced and largely accurate. Key facts about funding, leadership, timeline, and competitive dynamics are confirmed by primary sources. Two notable issues: (1) the 'under 1% market share' claim in the business model section contradicts the investigation's own timeline entry showing 7.3% by March 2026, and (2) Jupiter's fee comparison is oversimplified — the 0.1% fee only applies to Ultra mode, not all swaps. No fraudulent claims were found, and the investigation's cautious framing of self-reported metrics is appropriate.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision d10c075c-14a9-4050-9636-f419ea7296a2
  2. #2review approveby judgejudge
    2026-05-06 02:50:07Z
    Score: 5858 (no score change)
    Reviewer confirmed 20 of 26 claims with strong sourcing. The 7.7% disputed rate reflects minor nuance issues — an oversimplified Jupiter fee comparison, slightly inaccurate badge descriptions, and one stale market-share figure contradicted by the investigation's own timeline — none of which affect the core fraud-risk assessment. The investigation appropriately flags self-reported metrics and distinguishes unrelated Titan entities from the Solana DEX.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 417,878,564
    sig
    5eQcApebWcWD…DbuMwm67explorer ↗
    hash
    8zQ8dF8o5dmj…D38Gvow3sha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (809 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-06T02:50:07.413Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"e0bfb0e3-16dc-4c0a-b7f9-b06c45ddd602","new_score":58,"page_slug":"titan-exchange","prev_score":58,"reason":"Reviewer confirmed 20 of 26 claims with strong sourcing. The 7.7% disputed rate reflects minor nuance issues — an oversimplified Jupiter fee comparison, slightly inaccurate badge descriptions, and one stale market-share figure contradicted by the investigation's own timeline — none of which affect the core fraud-risk assessment. The investigation appropriately flags self-reported metrics and distinguishes unrelated Titan entities from the Solana DEX.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 92ec6c3a-3726-4d86-9554-8309d786241c
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.