← TEXITcoin / MineTXC / Blockchain Mintreviewed 2026-10-27 · 13 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read TEXITcoin / MineTXC / Blockchain Mint against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
disputed
1 claimThe reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.
- #5[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“TEXITcoin's legal team, including Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, moves to dismiss the Texas case before a full hearing; the administrative law judge denies the motion, citing disputed facts.”
reviewerThe timeline attributes the Quinn Emanuel motion and denial to Texas Public Radio, and calls it a motion to dismiss.The cited source does not support the Quinn Emanuel detail. Note that the section text on this timeline entry also needs a better source: the GlobeNewswire release is the one that mentions the firm.Proposed correction (not yet applied)TEXITcoin asks the administrative law judge to resolve the Texas case without a full hearing (company press release says its legal team includes Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan); the judge denies the request, citing disputed facts.
unverifiable
3 claimsNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #6[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“The four-day administrative hearing concludes; no public ruling on the order's fate has been identified.”
reviewerTimeline says the four-day hearing concluded in August 2026, citing a generic Medium homepage.Only the hearing's scheduled length is documented (through Aug 20). No source found confirming it concluded. The cited source is a homepage and should be replaced or removed. quoted_text for remove_source is the URL: https://coinmls.medium.com/citedcoinmls.medium.com/ - #12[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Alleged SEC Federal Investigation
“The MLM-industry watchdog blog BehindMLM reports that Gray has acknowledged a federal inquiry”
reviewerBehindMLM reports Gray acknowledged a federal inquiry and subpoenas, and plans to meet SEC staff in the UK.BehindMLM pages returned 403, so the claim was not checked. The page already hedges it as a low-confidence single-source claim. - #13[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Alleged Inflated Marketing Claims and Non-Operational Mining Infrastructure
“The outlet also reports Gray spent roughly $15 million defending the token's price on the BitMart exchange as it fell”
reviewerDisruption Banking reports fraction of hash power operational, $15M BitMart price defence, CoinMarketCap refusal.Direction of the reporting is consistent, but specific figures were not verified. Page appropriately labels them as alleged. This finding sits in sections[4] in the input.
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #4[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Administrative Hearing and Ongoing Legal Defense
“In July 2026, Gray's legal team, which came to include the litigation firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, asked the judge to resolve the case without a full hearing”
reviewerIn July 2026 Gray's team, including Quinn Emanuel, asked the judge to resolve the case without a full hearing; the judge denied it citing disputed facts.The request and denial are confirmed. Quinn Emanuel's involvement rests on a company press release and one critical outlet, not independent reporting. - #11[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Administrative Hearing and Ongoing Legal Defense
“Respondents' attorney Avi Perry called the fraud claim "not a real fraud case,"”
reviewerHearing arguments: Heintz framed 'What was really being sold?'; Perry called it 'not a real fraud case'.Perry's characterization matches in substance; the exact Heintz quote was not located.
confirmed
7 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Texas Emergency Cease-and-Desist Order
“On February 11, 2026, the Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) issued an emergency cease-and-desist order (No. ENF-26-CDO-1893)”
reviewerTexas State Securities Board issued an emergency cease-and-desist order on February 11, 2026 against TEXITcoin, MineTXC, Blockchain Mint and Gray; Ochoa quote and 'seats on the rocket ship'.Core regulatory action confirmed by the regulator. The price range and bonus cap were not verified from the press release. - #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Texas Emergency Cease-and-Desist Order
“TEXITcoin says it halted mining-package sales and recruitment globally after the order, while the underlying coin network kept operating.”
reviewerTEXITcoin says it halted mining-package sales and recruitment; network kept operating.Supported and attributed to the company. - #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Administrative Hearing and Ongoing Legal Defense
“an evidentiary hearing opened August 17, 2026, before Administrative Law Judge Katerina DeAngelo at the State Office of Administrative Hearings in Austin, scheduled to run four days”
reviewerEvidentiary hearing opened August 17, 2026, before ALJ Katerina DeAngelo in Austin, four days.The judge's name comes from the Aug 14 TPR article, which is also cited by the page. - #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Alleged Inflated Marketing Claims and Non-Operational Mining Infrastructure
“He gave an interview to Texas Public Radio from a boat in Singapore”
reviewerGray left the US ('self-imposed exile'), interviewed from a boat in Singapore.Confirmed. The Hong Kong and extradition-treaty details come from BehindMLM and were not checked. - #8[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Founder's Relocation Outside U.S. Jurisdiction
“Gray told Texas Public Radio the coin had approached $7 in September 2025 before later trading at only a few cents”
reviewerPrice approached $7 in September 2025 per Gray, later a few cents.Confirmed as Gray's statement. The page timeline says the price collapsed in 2025-12, consistent with BehindMLM's December collapse report, but the section also says the BehindMLM price slide followed the February 2026 order. These two accounts of timing are not reconciled. - #9[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Founder's Relocation Outside U.S. Jurisdiction
“New Zealand's Financial Markets Authority (FMA) issued a public warning dated February 24, 2026”
reviewerNZ FMA public warning dated February 24, 2026 naming TEXITcoin, MineTXC, Blockchain Mint and Gray.Date confirmed via search snippet; the full text was not readable. - #10[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Founder's Undisclosed History of Failed Ventures
“Texas regulators state the bankruptcy later converted to Chapter 7.”
reviewerMulligan Mint filed Chapter 11 in 2013, later converted to Chapter 7; Texas alleges promotion without disclosing the bankruptcy.Confirmed. The silver shipment figures, WSJ quote and congressional testimony were not checked.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.