← TEXITcoin / MineTXC / Blockchain Mint6 decisions on this page
Audit log
Every state-changing event for TEXITcoin / MineTXC / Blockchain Mint: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.
- #1publishby system:backfill2026-09-25 17:20:37ZScore: ? → ? (no score change)anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 450,418,187
- sig
2gLfXx4hEKvs…P4uKgBYWexplorer ↗- hash
6ZpBw9DdEv9z…cJVHZtMzsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (24347 B) ▸
{"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"21466a18-b366-4bdf-a8f3-c17504df0fd2","kind":"publish","page_slug":"texitcoin-minetxc-blockchain-mint","published_at":"2026-09-25T17:20:37.256Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"TEXITcoin / MineTXC / Blockchain Mint","sections":[{"content":"On February 11, 2026, the Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) issued Emergency Cease and Desist Order No. ENF-26-CDO-1893 against TEXITcoin, MineTXC, Blockchain Mint, and founder Robert J. Gray. The order alleged violations of the Texas Securities Act, including the fraudulent offer and sale of unregistered securities and operation as unregistered securities dealers or agents. The TSSB stated the conduct 'threatens immediate and irreparable harm to the public.' The order required respondents to immediately stop offering or selling unregistered securities in Texas. Deputy Securities Commissioner Cristi Ramón Ochoa cautioned investors to be wary of 'ones promising passive returns tied to cryptocurrency mining, particularly when promotions rely heavily on recruitment incentives.' The respondents deny all fraud allegations. On February 24, 2026, TEXITcoin, MineTXC, Blockchain Mint, and Gray formally requested a hearing, asserting the order is 'legally flawed and factually unsupported.'","heading":"Regulatory Action: Texas State Securities Board Emergency Order","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Order No. ENF-26-CDO-1893 — Texas State Securities Board","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.ssb.texas.gov/news-publications/order-no-enf-26-cdo-1893"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Texas Grounds Crypto Mining Investment 'Rocket Ship' — Texas State Securities Board","type":"regulatory","url":"https://ssb.texas.gov/news-publications/texas-grounds-crypto-mining-investment-rocket-ship"},{"credibility":1,"name":"ENF-26-CDO-1893 Full Order PDF — Texas State Securities Board","type":"court_filing","url":"https://www.ssb.texas.gov/sites/default/files/2026-02/ENF-26-CDO-1893.pdf"},{"credibility":2,"name":"TEXITcoin Formally Requests Hearing to Challenge Texas Cease and Desist Order — GlobeNewswire","type":"official","url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/02/24/3243819/0/en/texitcoin-formally-requests-hearing-to-challenge-texas-cease-and-desist-order.html"}]},{"content":"The TSSB enforcement division alleged that MineTXC offered passive cryptocurrency mining investments called 'Mining Packages,' which Gray and affiliated promoters frequently marketed as 'seats on the rocket ship.' Three tiers were offered: a Single Plan at $995 (100 megahash), a Triple Plan at $2,985 (300 megahash), and a Builder Plan at $8,955 (900 megahash). MineTXC's website claimed the operation raised more than $147–$148 million and paid approximately $65 million in commissions, with approximately 55,000–59,000 paying participants. The packages allegedly included a multilevel marketing compensation structure with commissions and bonuses for recruiting additional investors, paid in various cryptocurrencies or cash. Regulators alleged purchasers received insufficient material information about company finances, mining operations, how funds were safeguarded, and the qualifications of management. Respondents counter that buyers purchased actual computing power in a proof-of-work mining pool and that the referral program imposed limits on compensation — characterizing the arrangement as comparable to advance purchases of a commodity rather than a passive investment security.","heading":"Alleged Scheme: Unregistered Mining Package Securities","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Texas Grounds Crypto Mining Investment 'Rocket Ship' — Texas State Securities Board","type":"regulatory","url":"https://ssb.texas.gov/news-publications/texas-grounds-crypto-mining-investment-rocket-ship"},{"credibility":1,"name":"D-FW-based 'TEXITcoin' creator accused of fraud, hit with cease-and-desist order — Dallas Morning News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dallasnews.com/business/2026/02/19/d-fw-based-texitcoin-creator-accused-of-fraud-hit-with-cease-and-desist-order-by-texas/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Hearing opens over TEXITcoin securities and fraud allegations — Texas Public Radio","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-17/hearing-opens-over-texitcoin-securities-and-fraud-allegations"}]},{"content":"The TSSB order alleged that respondents failed to disclose material information to potential investors, including: (1) manager qualifications and business history; (2) financial information for a related entity called Danager Resources, which the order identified as the recipient of check payments from investors; and (3) that Robert Gray's earlier silver-minting venture, Mulligan Mint, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2013 (later converted to Chapter 7) and that a separate altcoin company also associated with Gray filed for bankruptcy and shut down in 2021. Regulators alleged the Mulligan Mint failure was 'intentionally' omitted from TEXITcoin promotional materials, despite Gray's promotional materials emphasizing his prior experience. Gray has stated publicly that he discussed Mulligan Mint's failure during community presentations and that he has been transparent about how that experience affected him. The extent and adequacy of any such disclosures remained a disputed factual matter at the time of the August 2026 hearing.","heading":"Alleged Disclosure Failures and Undisclosed Related Entities","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Texas regulators prepare fraud case against TEXITcoin as founder denies wrongdoing — Texas Public Radio","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-14/texas-regulators-prepare-fraud-case-against-texitcoin-as-founder-denies-wrongdoing/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"D-FW-based 'TEXITcoin' creator accused of fraud — Dallas Morning News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dallasnews.com/business/2026/02/19/d-fw-based-texitcoin-creator-accused-of-fraud-hit-with-cease-and-desist-order-by-texas/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Mulligan Mint, Dallas' Most Libertarian Coin-Maker, Filed For Bankruptcy — Dallas Observer","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/mulligan-mint-dallas-most-libertarian-coin-maker-filed-for-bankruptcy-last-week-7112110/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Texas Coin Maker for Fed-Estranged Files for Bankruptcy — American Bankruptcy Institute","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.abi.org/feed-item/texas-coin-maker-for-fed-estranged-files-for-bankruptcy"}]},{"content":"Robert J. 'Bobby' Gray is a McKinney, Texas-based entrepreneur who founded TEXITcoin and serves as a prominent public promoter of the venture. Gray has a background in gold and silver coin manufacturing and has claimed to have created 'the original Bitcoin coin' — a physical representation — in 2012, holding its copyright. He was president of Mulligan Mint, a Dallas-area libertarian-oriented silver-minting company that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in September 2013 after $1.4 million worth of silver allegedly went missing from a shipment, with supplier Republic Metals Corp. alleging Mulligan had not paid for 71,473 ounces of silver. When asked about the missing silver at the time, Gray told reporters 'We don't really know.' The Mulligan Mint Chapter 11 case was later converted to Chapter 7 liquidation. Disruption Banking reported, citing researcher analysis, that Gray has 'a documented history spanning twenty years of ventures that accumulate debt before dissolving through bankruptcy or default judgments.' That characterization has not been independently adjudicated. Immediately after the TSSB emergency order was issued on February 11, 2026, Gray traveled abroad. During a Zoom call on February 12, he stated 'I'm over in Hong Kong... I'm going to stay out here.' Later reporting placed him in Singapore, which he described as a 'self-imposed exile.' Hong Kong and Singapore have no extradition treaties with the United States for many financial offenses.","heading":"Founder Background: Robert J. 'Bobby' Gray","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Texas Grounds TEXITcoin's Mining Investment 'Rocket Ship,' Founder Flees to Hong Kong — Disruption Banking","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/02/13/texas-grounds-texitcoins-mining-investment-rocket-ship-founder-flees-to-hong-kong/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Texas regulators prepare fraud case against TEXITcoin — Texas Public Radio","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-14/texas-regulators-prepare-fraud-case-against-texitcoin-as-founder-denies-wrongdoing/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Republic Metals Corporation v. Mulligan Mint, Inc et al — GovInfo (federal court docket)","type":"court_filing","url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_13-cv-03001"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bobby Gray's Star Lawyers Can't Fix TEXITcoin's Math Problem — Disruption Banking","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/07/23/bobby-grays-star-lawyers-cant-fix-texitcoins-math-problem/"}]},{"content":"Independent researcher CoinMLS analyzed MineTXC's mining operation and found it was running at approximately 29% of the hash power sold to customers — meaning the physical mining infrastructure allegedly could not deliver the capacity purchasers paid for. TEXITcoin's token (TXC) peaked at approximately $6.35–$7 in September 2025, collapsed by roughly 50% following the cease-and-desist order in February 2026, and continued declining to approximately $0.20 by mid-2026. Gray acknowledged on video what he described as 'a little uh exploit' but reportedly could not specify which systems were affected, the financial impact, or whether customer funds were compromised; analysts characterize this as at least the third or fourth security incident. A motion for early dismissal filed July 8, 2026 by TEXITcoin's legal team (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan) cited an independent expert report by Andrew Sotak, CPA — a former DOJ and SEC professional — concluding that TXC qualifies as a digital commodity and that Mining Packages are ordinary revenue contracts, not securities. The TSSB did not concede these arguments, and the evidentiary hearing proceeded as scheduled.","heading":"Technical and Financial Concerns: Hash Power and Token Collapse","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Bobby Gray's Star Lawyers Can't Fix TEXITcoin's Math Problem — Disruption Banking","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/07/23/bobby-grays-star-lawyers-cant-fix-texitcoins-math-problem/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"World-Renowned Litigation Firm Quinn Emanuel Seeks Early Dismissal — GlobeNewswire","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/14/3327131/0/en/World-Renowned-Litigation-Firm-Quinn-Emanuel-Seeks-Early-Dismissal-of-Texas-Securities-Case-Against-TEXITcoin"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Texit Coin Too Good to Be True? — Disruption Banking","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2025/09/02/is-texit-coin-too-good-to-be-true/"}]},{"content":"A four-day evidentiary hearing opened August 17, 2026, at the State Office of Administrative Hearings in Austin before Administrative Law Judge Katerina DeAngelo, to determine whether to affirm, modify, or set aside the emergency cease-and-desist order. The TSSB argued purchasers 'supplied the capital, and respondents supplied and managed the enterprise,' and that promotional language such as 'seats on the rocketship' characterized packages as passive rather than active investments. Defense counsel for Gray countered that 'You buy a package, you get TXC... Nothing more, nothing less.' The hearing was livestreamed; TEXITcoin's own blog published a guest post claiming the hearing vindicated the respondents' position. As of late August 2026, no final decision had been issued. Post-hearing briefs were due October 9 and October 23, 2026, with the ALJ's formal recommendation expected by December 22, 2026. No court ruling on the merits of the fraud allegations had been made as of the date of this investigation.","heading":"Administrative Hearing and Pending Outcome","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Hearing opens over TEXITcoin securities and fraud allegations — Texas Public Radio","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-17/hearing-opens-over-texitcoin-securities-and-fraud-allegations"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Texas regulators prepare fraud case against TEXITcoin as founder denies wrongdoing — Texas Public Radio","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-14/texas-regulators-prepare-fraud-case-against-texitcoin-as-founder-denies-wrongdoing/"}]},{"content":"Following the cease-and-desist order, TEXITcoin announced a 'Phase 3' rebrand involving a transition to Iskander Coin and the Iskander Digital Mining Cooperative, a Wyoming-registered Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA). The project withheld token issuance pending claimed compliance with UAE laws, with a target of late April 2026 for full legal registration. Critics noted the rebrand did not resolve the underlying hash power discrepancy, the pending regulatory action, or the outstanding security incidents. The extent to which the rebrand constituted a substantive operational restructuring versus a jurisdictional repositioning was not independently verified as of this investigation.","heading":"Rebrand Attempt: Iskander Coin / Iskander Digital Mining Cooperative","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Bobby Gray's Star Lawyers Can't Fix TEXITcoin's Math Problem — Disruption Banking","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/07/23/bobby-grays-star-lawyers-cant-fix-texitcoins-math-problem/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Texitcoin Announces Phase Three — Iskander Coin — CoinMLS via Medium","type":"community_report","url":"https://coinmls.medium.com/texitcoin-announces-phase-three-and-its-45ae1d4827d7"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Iskander Digital Mining Cooperative official site","type":"official","url":"https://iskandercoin.com/"}]},{"content":"TEXITcoin's branding explicitly aligns with the Texas independence movement and the Texas Nationalist Movement. Gray promoted the coin as a vehicle tied to Texas sovereignty rhetoric. Both TEXITcoin and the Texas Nationalist Movement denied any formal affiliation with each other, though the TEXITcoin website retained the thematic branding. This political positioning was used in marketing and community-building efforts and is not itself a regulatory or legal concern, but it contextualizes the social base from which MineTXC attracted approximately 55,000 participants.","heading":"Political Branding and Texas Nationalist Movement","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Texas regulators prepare fraud case against TEXITcoin — Texas Public Radio","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-14/texas-regulators-prepare-fraud-case-against-texitcoin-as-founder-denies-wrongdoing/"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Order No. ENF-26-CDO-1893 — Texas State Securities Board","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.ssb.texas.gov/news-publications/order-no-enf-26-cdo-1893"},{"credibility":1,"name":"ENF-26-CDO-1893 Full Order PDF — Texas State Securities Board","type":"court_filing","url":"https://www.ssb.texas.gov/sites/default/files/2026-02/ENF-26-CDO-1893.pdf"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Texas Grounds Crypto Mining Investment 'Rocket Ship' — Texas State Securities Board","type":"regulatory","url":"https://ssb.texas.gov/news-publications/texas-grounds-crypto-mining-investment-rocket-ship"},{"credibility":1,"name":"D-FW-based 'TEXITcoin' creator accused of fraud, hit with cease-and-desist order — Dallas Morning News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dallasnews.com/business/2026/02/19/d-fw-based-texitcoin-creator-accused-of-fraud-hit-with-cease-and-desist-order-by-texas/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Hearing opens over TEXITcoin securities and fraud allegations — Texas Public Radio","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-17/hearing-opens-over-texitcoin-securities-and-fraud-allegations"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Texas regulators prepare fraud case against TEXITcoin as founder denies wrongdoing — Texas Public Radio","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-14/texas-regulators-prepare-fraud-case-against-texitcoin-as-founder-denies-wrongdoing/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Texas Grounds TEXITcoin's Mining Investment 'Rocket Ship,' Founder Flees to Hong Kong — Disruption Banking","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/02/13/texas-grounds-texitcoins-mining-investment-rocket-ship-founder-flees-to-hong-kong/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bobby Gray's Star Lawyers Can't Fix TEXITcoin's Math Problem — Disruption Banking","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/07/23/bobby-grays-star-lawyers-cant-fix-texitcoins-math-problem/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Texit Coin Too Good to Be True? — Disruption Banking","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2025/09/02/is-texit-coin-too-good-to-be-true/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"TEXITcoin Formally Requests Hearing to Challenge Texas Cease and Desist Order — GlobeNewswire","type":"official","url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/02/24/3243819/0/en/texitcoin-formally-requests-hearing-to-challenge-texas-cease-and-desist-order.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"World-Renowned Litigation Firm Quinn Emanuel Seeks Early Dismissal — GlobeNewswire","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/14/3327131/0/en/World-Renowned-Litigation-Firm-Quinn-Emanuel-Seeks-Early-Dismissal-of-Texas-Securities-Case-Against-TEXITcoin"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Mulligan Mint, Dallas' Most Libertarian Coin-Maker, Filed For Bankruptcy — Dallas Observer","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/mulligan-mint-dallas-most-libertarian-coin-maker-filed-for-bankruptcy-last-week-7112110/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Texas Coin Maker for Fed-Estranged Files for Bankruptcy — American Bankruptcy Institute","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.abi.org/feed-item/texas-coin-maker-for-fed-estranged-files-for-bankruptcy"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Republic Metals Corporation v. Mulligan Mint, Inc et al — GovInfo (federal court docket)","type":"court_filing","url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_13-cv-03001"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Texas hits TEXITcoin operator with cease and desist order — Austin American-Statesman","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.statesman.com/business/article/texitcoin-texas-cease-desist-21363015.php"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Texitcoin Announces Phase Three — Iskander Coin — CoinMLS via Medium","type":"community_report","url":"https://coinmls.medium.com/texitcoin-announces-phase-three-and-its-45ae1d4827d7"}],"summary":"TEXITcoin is a Texas-themed cryptocurrency venture founded by Robert J. 'Bobby' Gray of McKinney, Texas, operating alongside mining arm MineTXC and marketing/cold-storage arm Blockchain Mint. On February 11, 2026, the Texas State Securities Board issued Emergency Cease and Desist Order No. ENF-26-CDO-1893, alleging the respondents illegally and fraudulently sold unregistered 'Mining Package' securities to Texas residents through a multilevel marketing structure promising passive daily returns. An evidentiary hearing before Administrative Law Judge Katerina DeAngelo opened August 17, 2026; a final recommendation is expected by December 22, 2026, and no adjudication on the merits had been issued as of September 2026.","timeline":[{"date":"2013-09-01","event":"Mulligan Mint, a Dallas-area silver-minting company led by Robert Gray, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after allegations that $1.4 million in silver went missing from a shipment; the case was later converted to Chapter 7 liquidation.","source":"Dallas Observer / American Bankruptcy Institute","source_url":"https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/mulligan-mint-dallas-most-libertarian-coin-maker-filed-for-bankruptcy-last-week-7112110/"},{"date":"2021-01-01","event":"An earlier altcoin venture associated with Robert Gray, also connected to Mulligan Mint, reportedly filed for bankruptcy and shut down. Exact date approximate; year cited in TSSB enforcement materials.","source":"Dallas Morning News / TSSB order allegations","source_url":"https://www.dallasnews.com/business/2026/02/19/d-fw-based-texitcoin-creator-accused-of-fraud-hit-with-cease-and-desist-order-by-texas/"},{"date":"2025-09-01","event":"TEXITcoin (TXC) token reached a peak price of approximately $6.35–$7.","source":"Disruption Banking / Texas Public Radio","source_url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2025/09/02/is-texit-coin-too-good-to-be-true/"},{"date":"2026-02-11","event":"Texas State Securities Board issued Emergency Cease and Desist Order No. ENF-26-CDO-1893 against TEXITcoin, MineTXC, Blockchain Mint, and Robert J. Gray, alleging fraudulent sale of unregistered securities.","source":"Texas State Securities Board","source_url":"https://www.ssb.texas.gov/news-publications/order-no-enf-26-cdo-1893"},{"date":"2026-02-12","event":"Robert Gray stated via Zoom call that he was in Hong Kong and intended to remain there, the day after the emergency order was issued.","source":"Disruption Banking","source_url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/02/13/texas-grounds-texitcoins-mining-investment-rocket-ship-founder-flees-to-hong-kong/"},{"date":"2026-02-19","event":"Dallas Morning News published coverage of the enforcement action; token price had dropped below $0.30 from above $6 in the fall.","source":"Dallas Morning News","source_url":"https://www.dallasnews.com/business/2026/02/19/d-fw-based-texitcoin-creator-accused-of-fraud-hit-with-cease-and-desist-order-by-texas/"},{"date":"2026-02-24","event":"TEXITcoin, MineTXC, Blockchain Mint, and Gray formally requested a hearing to challenge the cease-and-desist order.","source":"GlobeNewswire","source_url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/02/24/3243819/0/en/texitcoin-formally-requests-hearing-to-challenge-texas-cease-and-desist-order.html"},{"date":"2026-07-08","event":"Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, retained by TEXITcoin, filed a Motion for Summary Disposition in SOAH Docket No. 312-26-14427 seeking early dismissal before the evidentiary hearing.","source":"GlobeNewswire","source_url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/14/3327131/0/en/World-Renowned-Litigation-Firm-Quinn-Emanuel-Seeks-Early-Dismissal-of-Texas-Securities-Case-Against-TEXITcoin"},{"date":"2026-08-14","event":"Texas Public Radio and Texas Standard reported on TSSB's preparation of its fraud case; Gray was now described as based in Singapore in a 'self-imposed exile.'","source":"Texas Public Radio","source_url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-14/texas-regulators-prepare-fraud-case-against-texitcoin-as-founder-denies-wrongdoing/"},{"date":"2026-08-17","event":"Four-day evidentiary hearing opened before Administrative Law Judge Katerina DeAngelo at the State Office of Administrative Hearings in Austin.","source":"Texas Public Radio","source_url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-17/hearing-opens-over-texitcoin-securities-and-fraud-allegations"},{"date":"2026-10-09","event":"Post-hearing initial briefs due from parties; final briefs due October 23, 2026.","source":"Texas Public Radio (hearing coverage)","source_url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-17/hearing-opens-over-texitcoin-securities-and-fraud-allegations"},{"date":"2026-12-22","event":"Administrative Law Judge's formal recommendation expected by this date. No final adjudication on the merits as of the date of this investigation (September 2026).","source":"Texas Public Radio (hearing coverage)","source_url":"https://www.tpr.org/economy-and-labor/2026-08-17/hearing-opens-over-texitcoin-securities-and-fraud-allegations"}]},"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision bc202c84-ccab-4178-b088-75fe89850bed - #2rescoreby systemsystem2026-10-10 18:39:55ZScore: 8 → 26 (+18)Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 8 → 26. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −95, concerns that are not fraud −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −1.8; legitimacy credit long-running +10; no established finding that it defrauded anyone, so it stays out of the red band.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 455,358,056
- sig
2eB5jjqvEfr7…92y4xxUdexplorer ↗- hash
AGrQ4CocDr3d…LLSvVSXbsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (739 B) ▸
{"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-10T18:39:55.799Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"21466a18-b366-4bdf-a8f3-c17504df0fd2","new_score":26,"page_slug":"texitcoin-minetxc-blockchain-mint","prev_score":8,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 8 → 26. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −95, concerns that are not fraud −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −1.8; legitimacy credit long-running +10; no established finding that it defrauded anyone, so it stays out of the red band.","score_delta":18,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 5be092a8-43fa-4aca-bff1-287163c30412 - #3reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-10-27 11:29:52ZScore: 26 → 26 (no score change)Core regulatory facts (order date and number, respondents, hearing date, judge, defense positions, Texas Nationalist Movement denial) are supported by TSSB and TPR. Not supported by the cited sources are the post-hearing brief deadlines and December 22 recommendation date, the Ochoa quote wording, and the tier pricing, which could not be read in the scanned order. The extradition sentence is uncited and imprecise for Singapore. The page omits that the ALJ denied the early-dismissal motion. Much of the hash-power and rebrand material rests on one critical commentary source.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,054,124
- sig
87JAux5tBpfe…7VxbVTRNexplorer ↗- hash
A9R6oao4N2tw…q53PHC4Asha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1487 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"1830bc7fdafffbaa41836ae029f1c3d5","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:29:52.039Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2308,"findings_hash":"7ymfVgs5KKSSjcvhe9MKHRLXdwHBcAeERsKSA2KkAkof","investigation_id":"21466a18-b366-4bdf-a8f3-c17504df0fd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":3},"page_content_hash":"45dd8e18b06e02877fa7c86c19d1cb5d7f806308dfb57bb806fdb8a3837e2af5","page_slug":"texitcoin-minetxc-blockchain-mint","prev_score":26,"reason":"Core regulatory facts (order date and number, respondents, hearing date, judge, defense positions, Texas Nationalist Movement denial) are supported by TSSB and TPR. Not supported by the cited sources are the post-hearing brief deadlines and December 22 recommendation date, the Ochoa quote wording, and the tier pricing, which could not be read in the scanned order. The extradition sentence is uncited and imprecise for Singapore. The page omits that the ALJ denied the early-dismissal motion. Much of the hash-power and rebrand material rests on one critical commentary source.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":13,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 74093fff-b576-4b10-98d9-77bbd73d7e7b - #4review reviseby judgejudge2026-10-27 11:29:52ZScore: 26 → 26 (no score change)Of 14 claim findings, 1 was excluded because the source blocked the reviewer, and 3 of the remaining 13 (about 23%) could not be verified: the Ochoa quote wording (claim_findings[1]) and the post-hearing brief and December 22 recommendation dates (claim_findings[9], [10]), which the cited Texas Public Radio article does not contain. None were disputed, and the core regulatory facts (order number, date, respondents, hearing date, judge) are confirmed by Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. Several partially supported items need tightening: the extradition sentence is uncited and imprecise for Singapore, the $0.20 token price is not clearly consistent with the source, and the page omits that the judge denied the early-dismissal motion. Omissions are all minor and the subject status does not contradict the page. The two high-priority coverage gaps (the scanned order and the court schedule) and the reviewer's moderate confidence keep the penalty at the low end of the band.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,054,129
- sig
ZCmG62FZcqvY…qfGb6UZvexplorer ↗- hash
85sYJtteghHg…fPkE22Cfsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1677 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"1830bc7fdafffbaa41836ae029f1c3d5","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:29:52.039Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2308,"investigation_id":"21466a18-b366-4bdf-a8f3-c17504df0fd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"page_slug":"texitcoin-minetxc-blockchain-mint","prev_score":26,"reason":"Of 14 claim findings, 1 was excluded because the source blocked the reviewer, and 3 of the remaining 13 (about 23%) could not be verified: the Ochoa quote wording (claim_findings[1]) and the post-hearing brief and December 22 recommendation dates (claim_findings[9], [10]), which the cited Texas Public Radio article does not contain. None were disputed, and the core regulatory facts (order number, date, respondents, hearing date, judge) are confirmed by Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. Several partially supported items need tightening: the extradition sentence is uncited and imprecise for Singapore, the $0.20 token price is not clearly consistent with the source, and the page omits that the judge denied the early-dismissal motion. Omissions are all minor and the subject status does not contradict the page. The two high-priority coverage gaps (the scanned order and the court schedule) and the reviewer's moderate confidence keep the penalty at the low end of the band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":13,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 4809bb8e-cff8-4676-b31c-66d4f919657e - #5reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-10-27 18:16:03ZScore: 26 → 26 (no score change)The Texas order, hearing date, judge, Gray's relocation, price statement, NZ warning and the Mulligan Mint bankruptcy match fetched sources. One timeline entry attributes the Quinn Emanuel motion to TPR, which does not mention the firm and describes a request to decide the case without a hearing. The final timeline entry says the hearing concluded but cites a Medium homepage that could not be read and no source confirms it. Single-source watchdog claims (SEC inquiry, hash power, finances) could not be checked because of 403s, though the page labels them as lower-confidence. Subject appears still operating at the network level with the Texas matter pending.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,168,749
- sig
3XoVYXSsLK7D…2gXsSpeAexplorer ↗- hash
6gR1s2kLGJTX…ufF3DzgJsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1574 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"5dcd8fe12ddbcb102ad70350001dbbc0","blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T18:16:03.386Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1818,"findings_hash":"2NCE3uz2Nm28LFrtzjtfNURHATxvSFYjno6DUwEb7bJn","investigation_id":"21466a18-b366-4bdf-a8f3-c17504df0fd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"dd8f5c1ff357d67e81f52e88ceb04d48703e660141ab377665c08e554c5b6ff4","page_slug":"texitcoin-minetxc-blockchain-mint","prev_score":26,"reason":"The Texas order, hearing date, judge, Gray's relocation, price statement, NZ warning and the Mulligan Mint bankruptcy match fetched sources. One timeline entry attributes the Quinn Emanuel motion to TPR, which does not mention the firm and describes a request to decide the case without a hearing. The final timeline entry says the hearing concluded but cites a Medium homepage that could not be read and no source confirms it. Single-source watchdog claims (SEC inquiry, hash power, finances) could not be checked because of 403s, though the page labels them as lower-confidence. Subject appears still operating at the network level with the Texas matter pending.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":5,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 3cd1a5fe-67c1-4963-8d83-1fc248b04bbd - #6review reviseby judgejudge2026-10-27 18:16:03ZScore: 26 → 26 (no score change)The core allegations hold up: the Texas emergency order, the hearing date and length, the judge, Gray's relocation, the New Zealand warning and the Mulligan Mint bankruptcy were confirmed against regulator and news sources. Two of 11 countable claim findings (about 18%) were problem findings. claim_findings[4] is disputed because the timeline credits Texas Public Radio for the Quinn Emanuel motion and calls it a motion to dismiss, but that article does not name the firm and describes a request to decide the case without a full hearing. claim_findings[12] (the Disruption Banking figures) could not be verified. Two findings (claim_findings[5] and [10]) were blocked by the source and are excluded from the percentage, which is a coverage limit rather than a defect of the page. The final timeline entry cites a publication homepage and no source confirms the hearing concluded. The review found only a minor omission, no contradiction of the page by the subject's current status, and moderate reviewer confidence, so the penalty stays small.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,168,754
- sig
K7BEWUniZxLz…NUr4TRsqexplorer ↗- hash
4Jsq4j4zCGpc…eCZawnLFsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1751 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"5dcd8fe12ddbcb102ad70350001dbbc0","band_override":null,"blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T18:16:03.386Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1818,"investigation_id":"21466a18-b366-4bdf-a8f3-c17504df0fd2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"page_slug":"texitcoin-minetxc-blockchain-mint","prev_score":26,"reason":"The core allegations hold up: the Texas emergency order, the hearing date and length, the judge, Gray's relocation, the New Zealand warning and the Mulligan Mint bankruptcy were confirmed against regulator and news sources. Two of 11 countable claim findings (about 18%) were problem findings. claim_findings[4] is disputed because the timeline credits Texas Public Radio for the Quinn Emanuel motion and calls it a motion to dismiss, but that article does not name the firm and describes a request to decide the case without a full hearing. claim_findings[12] (the Disruption Banking figures) could not be verified. Two findings (claim_findings[5] and [10]) were blocked by the source and are excluded from the percentage, which is a coverage limit rather than a defect of the page. The final timeline entry cites a publication homepage and no source confirms the hearing concluded. The review found only a minor omission, no contradiction of the page by the subject's current status, and moderate reviewer confidence, so the penalty stays small.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 1b12e614-747d-43ad-8e06-57aa9138283e
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine —
python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.