Skip to main content
Sign in
Tether3 decisions on this page

Audit log

Every state-changing event for Tether: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.

  1. #1publishby system:backfill
    2026-05-14 06:02:35Z
    Score: ?? (no score change)
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 419,628,930
    sig
    27QdDbpwbYRV…86x71WBjexplorer ↗
    hash
    DXHEmc9ot6aZ…LMbjtP13sha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (6349 B) ▸
    {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"0e3605d0-c29f-493c-89d4-6c756264a7eb","kind":"publish","page_slug":"tether","published_at":"2026-05-14T06:02:35.538Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Tether","sections":[{"content":"Tether has been subject to multiple regulatory actions. In February 2021, Tether and affiliated exchange Bitfinex agreed to pay $18.5 million to settle charges with the New York Attorney General's office, which alleged that Tether had made false statements about USDT being fully backed by U.S. dollars. The settlement required Tether to cease trading with New York residents and provide quarterly reports on its reserves. In October 2021, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) fined Tether $41 million, alleging that USDT was not fully backed by U.S. dollars during certain periods between 2016-2018, contradicting the company's claims of full dollar backing.","heading":"Regulatory Actions and Legal Settlements","severity":"high","sources":["NYAG settlement agreement","CFTC enforcement action"]},{"content":"Tether's reserve composition has been a subject of ongoing scrutiny and evolution. Initially, Tether claimed USDT was backed 1:1 by U.S. dollars in bank accounts. However, attestations and regulatory disclosures have revealed a more complex reserve structure including cash equivalents, commercial paper, corporate bonds, and other assets. As of recent attestations, Tether reports that its reserves include significant holdings in U.S. Treasury bills, money market funds, and other short-term instruments. The company publishes quarterly attestation reports, though these fall short of full audits that some stakeholders have requested.","heading":"Reserve Transparency and Backing Claims","severity":"medium","sources":["Quarterly attestation reports","Reserve composition disclosures"]},{"content":"Tether and the Bitfinex cryptocurrency exchange share common ownership and management, which has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and fund commingling. Court documents from the NYAG investigation revealed that Tether allegedly provided loans totaling hundreds of millions of dollars to Bitfinex to help cover liquidity issues, potentially using funds that were supposed to back USDT tokens. These arrangements were not initially disclosed to users, leading to transparency concerns about the independence of Tether's reserves.","heading":"Bitfinex Relationship and Loan Arrangements","severity":"high","sources":["NYAG court filings","Legal discovery documents"]},{"content":"Tether has faced challenges maintaining stable banking relationships, with several banks reportedly ending their relationships with the company over the years. These banking difficulties have led Tether to work with various financial institutions globally, sometimes through intermediary arrangements. The company has stated it works with multiple banks and financial service providers, though it typically does not disclose specific banking partners, citing security and competitive concerns.","heading":"Banking and Financial Relationships","severity":"medium","sources":["Public statements by Tether","Financial industry reports"]},{"content":"Given USDT's position as the largest stablecoin with over $80 billion in circulation, concerns have been raised about potential systemic risks to the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. Financial regulators and economists have noted that a significant de-pegging or liquidity crisis involving USDT could have cascading effects across digital asset markets. However, USDT has generally maintained its dollar peg during various market stress events, including major cryptocurrency market downturns.","heading":"Market Impact and Systemic Risk Concerns","severity":"medium","sources":["Regulatory reports on stablecoin risks","Academic research on cryptocurrency systemic risk"]},{"content":"Despite controversies, Tether continues to operate as a major cryptocurrency infrastructure provider. USDT maintains high trading volumes and is widely used across cryptocurrency exchanges and DeFi protocols. The token has generally maintained its dollar peg within normal ranges, and Tether reports processing billions of dollars in redemption requests without significant delays. The company has also expanded to multiple blockchain networks beyond its original Bitcoin-based implementation.","heading":"Operational Performance","severity":"low","sources":["Market data from cryptocurrency exchanges","On-chain transaction data"]}],"sources_used":["NYAG settlement agreement","CFTC enforcement action","Quarterly attestation reports","Reserve composition disclosures","NYAG court filings","Legal discovery documents","Public statements by Tether","Financial industry reports","Regulatory reports on stablecoin risks","Academic research on cryptocurrency systemic risk","Market data from cryptocurrency exchanges","On-chain transaction data","Company announcements","Terms of service revisions"],"summary":"Tether is the issuer of USDT, the world's largest stablecoin by market capitalization. The company has faced ongoing regulatory scrutiny, transparency concerns, and legal challenges regarding its reserves and business practices, though it continues to operate as a major cryptocurrency infrastructure provider.","timeline":[{"date":"2014-10-06","event":"Tether (originally RealCoin) launched, claiming 1:1 USD backing","source":"Company announcement"},{"date":"2017-11-21","event":"Tether reports $31 million in USDT tokens stolen from treasury wallet","source":"Tether security announcement"},{"date":"2018-06-01","event":"Tether updates terms of service, removing claim that tokens are backed by USD in bank account","source":"Terms of service revision"},{"date":"2019-04-25","event":"New York Attorney General files court action alleging $850 million loss cover-up","source":"NYAG court filing"},{"date":"2021-02-23","event":"Tether settles with NYAG for $18.5 million, agrees to transparency measures","source":"NYAG settlement agreement"},{"date":"2021-10-15","event":"CFTC fines Tether $41 million over backing claims","source":"CFTC enforcement action"},{"date":"2021-12-03","event":"Tether begins publishing quarterly attestation reports on reserves","source":"First quarterly attestation report"}]},"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 14099522-6236-4fda-a657-e0a961d50d35
  2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-06-14 23:16:24Z
    Score: 4545 (no score change)
    Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Tether is a legitimate, operating stablecoin issuer — not a scam, Ponzi, or exit — that has paid two material regulatory fines (CFTC $41M, NYAG $18.5M) for documented misrepresentations about reserve backing between 2016 and 2019. Those violations are real, confirmed, and appropriately incriminating. However, the entity continued operating, settled without fraud convictions, now publishes quarterly BDO Italia attestations, and in March 2026 engaged KPMG for the first full Big Four audit — significant transparency steps absent from the page. The page's $80B+ market-cap figure is approximately 60% stale (current ~$185B), its timeline misstates the critical terms-change year as 2018 rather than 2019, and it omits the 2024 DOJ AML/sanctions probe entirely. The 2017 $31M hack is an external theft suffered by the entity and should not drive the score downward as owner-fraud. Balancing confirmed prior-period regulatory violations (warranting a material caveat) against the absence of fraud convictions, the entity's continued legitimate market function, and recent transparency progress, a score of 52 in the CAUTIONARY band is appropriate: legitimate operator with material, documented, but now-partially-resolved caveats. A score of 45/WARNING overstates current fraud risk relative to the evidence standard in the band policy.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 426,514,979
    sig
    KtzZ5nr2K8s3…JnAiwwYJexplorer ↗
    hash
    4qeabvu5xdXy…Kr4TVeUSsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1820 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:24.700Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"0e3605d0-c29f-493c-89d4-6c756264a7eb","new_score":45,"page_slug":"tether","prev_score":45,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Tether is a legitimate, operating stablecoin issuer — not a scam, Ponzi, or exit — that has paid two material regulatory fines (CFTC $41M, NYAG $18.5M) for documented misrepresentations about reserve backing between 2016 and 2019. Those violations are real, confirmed, and appropriately incriminating. However, the entity continued operating, settled without fraud convictions, now publishes quarterly BDO Italia attestations, and in March 2026 engaged KPMG for the first full Big Four audit — significant transparency steps absent from the page. The page's $80B+ market-cap figure is approximately 60% stale (current ~$185B), its timeline misstates the critical terms-change year as 2018 rather than 2019, and it omits the 2024 DOJ AML/sanctions probe entirely. The 2017 $31M hack is an external theft suffered by the entity and should not drive the score downward as owner-fraud. Balancing confirmed prior-period regulatory violations (warranting a material caveat) against the absence of fraud convictions, the entity's continued legitimate market function, and recent transparency progress, a score of 52 in the CAUTIONARY band is appropriate: legitimate operator with material, documented, but now-partially-resolved caveats. A score of 45/WARNING overstates current fraud risk relative to the evidence standard in the band policy.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision fcbb9c8a-c0c5-4500-9541-79eb7081297f
  3. #3review approveby judgejudge
    2026-06-14 23:16:24Z
    Score: 4552 (+7)
    This is a severity-calibration adjudication. All six claim findings are supported — the page content is accurate and the page stands. The reviewer (confidence 0.82) finds the current score of 45/WARNING overstates risk because: the 2017 $31M treasury theft (claim_findings[2]) was external fraud suffered by Tether, not operator misconduct; both regulatory settlements (claim_findings[0] and [1]) were civil, paid without fraud convictions, and relate to a documented prior period (2016–2019); and the entity has since engaged KPMG for a full Big Four audit (claim_findings[4]), a material transparency step absent from the page. The page also carries a stale market-cap figure and a minor timeline date error (claim_findings[3] and [4]), but these are content refresh items that do not affect the calibration verdict. Balancing confirmed, now-partially-resolved regulatory violations against the absence of fraud convictions and recent transparency progress, a score of 52 in the CAUTIONARY band is the appropriate calibration. A positive delta of +7 is applied to move the score from 45 to 52.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    mainnet-betaslot 426,514,982
    sig
    Sgg9FQoT95Fj…UaPoebvMexplorer ↗
    hash
    BPEN6EYnvW3v…1TfQm5Zysha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1442 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:24.700Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"0e3605d0-c29f-493c-89d4-6c756264a7eb","new_score":52,"page_slug":"tether","prev_score":45,"reason":"This is a severity-calibration adjudication. All six claim findings are supported — the page content is accurate and the page stands. The reviewer (confidence 0.82) finds the current score of 45/WARNING overstates risk because: the 2017 $31M treasury theft (claim_findings[2]) was external fraud suffered by Tether, not operator misconduct; both regulatory settlements (claim_findings[0] and [1]) were civil, paid without fraud convictions, and relate to a documented prior period (2016–2019); and the entity has since engaged KPMG for a full Big Four audit (claim_findings[4]), a material transparency step absent from the page. The page also carries a stale market-cap figure and a minor timeline date error (claim_findings[3] and [4]), but these are content refresh items that do not affect the calibration verdict. Balancing confirmed, now-partially-resolved regulatory violations against the absence of fraud convictions and recent transparency progress, a score of 52 in the CAUTIONARY band is the appropriate calibration. A positive delta of +7 is applied to move the score from 45 to 52.","score_delta":7,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision b7b14a16-8864-46be-87cc-085a33e4babe
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.