← Tenderize V23 decisions on this page
Audit log
Every state-changing event for Tenderize V2: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.
- #1publishby system:backfill2026-05-30 04:05:51ZScore: ? → ? (no score change)anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 423,080,238
- sig
2AQ4tKRBjeHa…6iMomn4Eexplorer ↗- hash
CnMXiEKQJ5Sf…756NeHxPsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (4601 B) ▸
{"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"799ef0a4-716e-486c-8b93-360aff2f6c3c","kind":"publish","page_slug":"tenderize-v2","published_at":"2026-05-30T04:05:51.935Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Tenderize V2","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://blog.tenderize.me/introducing-tenderize-v2-our-new-look-2/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://blog.tenderize.me/the-cookout-tenderize-v2-mainnet-launch/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://blog.tenderize.me/tenderize-is-live-on-sei/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://everstake.one/blog/what-is-tenderize-v2-an-overview","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://defillama.com/protocol/tenderize-v2","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://blog.tenderize.me/tenderize-passes-hacken-audit-with-a-9-8-10/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.halborn.com/audits/tenderize","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://github.com/Tenderize","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://blog.tenderize.me/wagyu-tokenomics-tge-timeline/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.tenderize.me/blog/wagyu-tokenomics-tge-timeline","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/tenderize-announces-3m-seed-round-301604134.html","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://grtiq.com/grtiq-podcast-87-nico-vergauwen/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://defillama.com/protocol/tenderize-v2","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.streetinsider.com/Accesswire/Tenderize+v2+Mainnet+Launch+Revolutionizes+DeFi+and+Liquid+Staking+Ecosystem/22627798.html","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://everstake.one/blog/what-is-tenderize-v2-an-overview","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://blog.tenderize.me/tenderize-is-live-on-sei/","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"Tenderize V2 is a DeFi liquid staking protocol launched on January 29, 2024, enabling users to mint validator-specific liquid staked tokens (tTokens) for assets including MATIC, LPT, and GRT across Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Sei Network. The protocol suffered a protocol logic exploit on April 7, 2025, resulting in a loss of approximately $10,850 via a proxy upgrade skim technique on Ethereum; the incident was relatively small in dollar terms but raised concerns about smart contract integrity. ZachXBT has flagged this entity, and while the protocol holds multiple security audits including a Hacken audit scoring 9.8/10 and a Halborn audit, its current TVL of approximately $495,000 reflects limited adoption relative to the broader liquid staking market.","timeline":[{"date":"2021-12-01","event":"Tenderize protocol founded by Nico Vergauwen following his work at Livepeer and the Livepool precursor project.","source":""},{"date":"2022-04-29","event":"Tenderize completes Hacken security audit, receiving an overall score of 9.8/10; initial security subscore of 0/10 raised to 10/10 after remediation.","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-11","event":"Tenderize announces $3 million seed funding round led by Eden Block, with participation from TRGC, Encode Club, Figment, Daedalus Angels, and others.","source":""},{"date":"2024-01-29","event":"Tenderize V2 launches on mainnet on Ethereum L1 and Arbitrum L2, supporting MATIC, LPT, and GRT staking, alongside 'The Cookout' points campaign.","source":""},{"date":"2024-05-01","event":"WAGYU token generation event (TGE) and genesis airdrop distribution to early Cookout participants; WAGYU streamed to stakers over 33-month schedule.","source":""},{"date":"2025-04-07","event":"Tenderize V2 suffers a protocol logic exploit via proxy upgrade skim technique on Ethereum, resulting in an alleged loss of approximately $10,850.","source":""},{"date":"2025-09-18","event":"Tenderize protocol goes live on Sei Network, offering tSEI liquid staking and TenderSwap functionality, with BeefyBank planned for October 2025.","source":""}]},"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision dd6cd039-9c38-4cba-bfc4-42744f4e3f58 - #2reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-06-10 15:08:11ZScore: 52 → 52 (no score change)The majority of factual claims about Tenderize V2 are confirmed or partially supported by independent sources. The most significant concern is the unverified claim that ZachXBT flagged this entity, which carries substantial reputational weight but has no cited source and could not be independently confirmed. The TVL figure of ~$495K is stale; current data shows the Ethereum+Arbitrum portion at ~$343K while the full protocol (including Sei) is approximately $13M. Minor date discrepancies exist in the Hacken audit timeline entry, and the WAGYU TGE date of 'May 2024' is plausible but imprecise based on available evidence.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 425,569,813
- sig
Yz69fDowRxua…CjLg4sApexplorer ↗- hash
8AKgye4zS5wa…FAcwWshMsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (974 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-10T15:08:11.389Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"799ef0a4-716e-486c-8b93-360aff2f6c3c","new_score":52,"page_slug":"tenderize-v2","prev_score":52,"reason":"The majority of factual claims about Tenderize V2 are confirmed or partially supported by independent sources. The most significant concern is the unverified claim that ZachXBT flagged this entity, which carries substantial reputational weight but has no cited source and could not be independently confirmed. The TVL figure of ~$495K is stale; current data shows the Ethereum+Arbitrum portion at ~$343K while the full protocol (including Sei) is approximately $13M. Minor date discrepancies exist in the Hacken audit timeline entry, and the WAGYU TGE date of 'May 2024' is plausible but imprecise based on available evidence.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 30a6e2e5-accc-491c-aa22-87274ee54558 - #3review reviseby judgejudge2026-06-10 15:08:11ZScore: 52 → 37 (-15)The reviewer confirmed 8 of 13 claims outright, with no claims formally disputed. However, claim_findings[4] — that ZachXBT flagged this entity — is unverifiable: no cited source exists in the page and independent search found no connection between ZachXBT and Tenderize. Because this allegation appears in the page summary and carries significant reputational weight, it cannot remain unsourced. Additionally, claim_findings[7] shows the stated TVL of ~$495,000 is stale relative to current DefiLlama data. Minor date imprecision in claim_findings[10] and an unconfirmed TGE date in claim_findings[11] are lower-severity but also warrant correction. The page should be revised to either source or remove the ZachXBT reference, update the TVL figure, and correct the Hacken audit timeline date.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 425,569,816
- sig
27uCP8Rhs2YX…UHFTsg9Gexplorer ↗- hash
CrfEf2yex1Y2…uEnJS4QAsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1148 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-10T15:08:11.389Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"799ef0a4-716e-486c-8b93-360aff2f6c3c","new_score":37,"page_slug":"tenderize-v2","prev_score":52,"reason":"The reviewer confirmed 8 of 13 claims outright, with no claims formally disputed. However, claim_findings[4] — that ZachXBT flagged this entity — is unverifiable: no cited source exists in the page and independent search found no connection between ZachXBT and Tenderize. Because this allegation appears in the page summary and carries significant reputational weight, it cannot remain unsourced. Additionally, claim_findings[7] shows the stated TVL of ~$495,000 is stale relative to current DefiLlama data. Minor date imprecision in claim_findings[10] and an unconfirmed TGE date in claim_findings[11] are lower-severity but also warrant correction. The page should be revised to either source or remove the ZachXBT reference, update the TVL figure, and correct the Hacken audit timeline date.","score_delta":-15,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 0bcb7b08-8fe2-4aca-9f44-612f8dc9da55
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine —
python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.