Audit log

Every state-changing event for Seoul Northern Coin Fraud Ring (91.3 Billion Won Scheme): moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-27 11:06:59Z
   Score: 2 → 2 (no score change)
   Core facts (verdict, sentences, amounts, period, scheme mechanics, ringleader ages and background) are confirmed by Edaily and Seoul Economic Daily. Issues are minor: an unsupported claim that exchanges were controlled or influenced by the group, an editorial 'pyramid-style' inference, two unmatched direct quotes, and an uncited 11 billion won comparison case. Appeal status is unknown.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,047,730

   sig

   RtChMd3ed6JT…ndHB34KXcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   j1MLTpcyCRzQ…s1xbmto2copysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1278 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"aad60d619ba3c4aa511a454715d961fa","decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:06:59.195Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.0769,"findings_hash":"353q7nUW87mwW2YGYBoENCatModACSRR5ZxaB4dwj9b1","investigation_id":"03008484-916d-4a38-8ecd-9f05ee2ee4f4","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":2,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"830b3f599e9d2415153c394c02115055a2d0def06f41454522342a886658272f","page_slug":"seoul-northern-coin-fraud-ring-91-3-billion-won-scheme","prev_score":2,"reason":"Core facts (verdict, sentences, amounts, period, scheme mechanics, ringleader ages and background) are confirmed by Edaily and Seoul Economic Daily. Issues are minor: an unsupported claim that exchanges were controlled or influenced by the group, an editorial 'pyramid-style' inference, two unmatched direct quotes, and an uncited 11 billion won comparison case. Appeal status is unknown.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 15684439-2f67-44f2-8372-f59b19d794f9copy
2. #2review approveby judgejudge

   2026-10-27 11:06:59Z
   Score: 2 → 2 (no score change)
   Of 12 claims checked, none were disputed and one (claim_findings[9], an uncited 11 billion won comparison case in a low-severity context section) could not be verified, giving a disputed rate of about 8%. The core facts are confirmed by two Tier 2 outlets: the 19 August 2026 verdict, the 14-year sentences, the 91.3 billion won figure, the scheme period and the scheme mechanics (claim_findings[0-2,4,7-8]). Three claims are only partly supported: the claim that the group controlled or influenced exchanges (claim_findings[5]), the 'pyramid-style' wording (claim_findings[6]) and two unmatched direct quotes (claim_findings[3]). These are small wording corrections. The one high-priority coverage gap, that no coins or exchanges are named, is a limit the page already states, so the page stays approved and the gap is a suggestion to expand it. The omissions are minor and the appeal status is unknown, so no escalation applies.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,047,735

   sig

   5MXqFCJgajwn…4c2r5sBocopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   9C7W8gu8Zvf6…tKy7EvPUcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1617 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"aad60d619ba3c4aa511a454715d961fa","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:06:59.195Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.0769,"investigation_id":"03008484-916d-4a38-8ecd-9f05ee2ee4f4","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":2,"page_slug":"seoul-northern-coin-fraud-ring-91-3-billion-won-scheme","prev_score":2,"reason":"Of 12 claims checked, none were disputed and one (claim_findings[9], an uncited 11 billion won comparison case in a low-severity context section) could not be verified, giving a disputed rate of about 8%. The core facts are confirmed by two Tier 2 outlets: the 19 August 2026 verdict, the 14-year sentences, the 91.3 billion won figure, the scheme period and the scheme mechanics (claim_findings[0-2,4,7-8]). Three claims are only partly supported: the claim that the group controlled or influenced exchanges (claim_findings[5]), the 'pyramid-style' wording (claim_findings[6]) and two unmatched direct quotes (claim_findings[3]). These are small wording corrections. The one high-priority coverage gap, that no coins or exchanges are named, is a limit the page already states, so the page stays approved and the gap is a suggestion to expand it. The omissions are minor and the appeal status is unknown, so no escalation applies.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 4b1040f0-7275-4750-99cf-55fb4322f324copy