Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Seedify5 decisions on this page

Audit log

Every state-changing event for Seedify: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

  1. #1publishby system:backfill
    2026-05-26 15:34:28Z
    Score: ? → ? (no score change)
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 422,312,368
    sig
    2chJiK2jWzSJ…WQyndyGQexplorer ↗
    hash
    2DHLhYK1cWZP…GgDptmWssha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (7409 B) ▸
    {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"e2374c5c-3048-4ecf-bd6f-7431aaa904a3","kind":"publish","page_slug":"seedify","published_at":"2026-05-26T15:34:28.162Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Seedify","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/341076/north-korean-hackers-drain-1-2m-from-seedify-bridge","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/single/seedify-bridge-exploit","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinfomania.com/cz-confirms-1-2m-sfund-hack-says-dprk-hackers-likely-involved/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/4bc08-sfund-token-crashes-99-as-north-korean-hackers-drain-1-2m-from-seedify-bridge","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://bravenewcoin.com/insights/sfund-token-crashes-99-as-north-korean-hackers-drain-1-2m-from-seedify-bridge","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://playtoearn.com/news/seedify-hit-by-major-security-breach-12m-drained-from-sfund-bridge","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://gam3s.gg/news/seedify-suffers-breach/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinfomania.com/cz-confirms-1-2m-sfund-hack-says-dprk-hackers-likely-involved/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://gam3s.gg/news/seedify-suffers-breach/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/zachxbt-uncovers-crypto-theft-network-linked-to-us-government-seizure-funds","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/a0f18-cz-confirms-200k-frozen-at-htx-after-sfund","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coinlore.com/coin/seedify-fund/historical-data","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/seedify-token-dropped-nearly-60-161434570.html","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://bravenewcoin.com/insights/sfund-token-crashes-99-as-north-korean-hackers-drain-1-2m-from-seedify-bridge","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/4bc08-sfund-token-crashes-99-as-north-korean-hackers-drain-1-2m-from-seedify-bridge","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://ourcryptotalk.com/news/seedify-launches-phoenix-raise","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://blog.seedify.fund/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-sfund-migration-e7e09c702199","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/SeedifyFund/status/1970922016313139300","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://gam3s.gg/news/seedify-suffers-breach/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coincarp.com/launchpad-platform/seedify/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://docs.seedify.fund/whitepaper/seedify.fund-incubator-basics","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://blog.seedify.fund/a-launch-model-for-real-icm-builders-futarchy-milestones-775bb4b5105b","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cointelegraph.com/press-releases/seedify-premier-launchpad-and-incubator-presents-the-mounts-of-seedworld-nft-collection","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://theorg.com/org/seedify/org-chart/levent-aydan","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.pcrisk.com/removal-guides/29668-seedify-sfund-scam","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.pcrisk.com/removal-guides/31484-seedify-regstration-scam","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.scam-detector.com/validator/seedify-fund-review/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/launchpad-seedify.fund","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/single/seedify-bridge-exploit","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/341076/north-korean-hackers-drain-1-2m-from-seedify-bridge","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.okx.com/en-us/learn/seedify-hack-crypto-exploit","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://bravenewcoin.com/insights/sfund-token-crashes-99-as-north-korean-hackers-drain-1-2m-from-seedify-bridge","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"Seedify (Seedify.fund) is a blockchain gaming incubator and IDO/IGO launchpad founded in February 2021 by Levent Cem Aydan, operating on BNB Chain, Ethereum, and Avalanche with its native SFUND token. The platform suffered a critical $1.2–1.7 million bridge exploit in September 2025 attributed by ZachXBT and CZ (Binance) to the North Korean DPRK-affiliated 'Contagious Interview' hacking campaign, causing SFUND to collapse approximately 80–99% and affecting approximately 64,000 token holders. The platform's SFUND token has declined more than 99% from its November 2021 all-time high of approximately $17.67, and the project has been flagged by ZachXBT in connection with the on-chain forensics tying the exploit to state-sponsored theft infrastructure.","timeline":[{"date":"2021-02-01","event":"Seedify.fund founded by Levent Cem Aydan as a blockchain gaming incubator and IDO launchpad; SFUND token launches at approximately $0.40.","source":""},{"date":"2021-11-29","event":"SFUND reaches all-time high of approximately $17.67, representing a roughly 4,300% gain from launch price.","source":""},{"date":"2022-01-01","event":"SFUND begins sustained decline throughout 2022, losing approximately 90% of value by year-end, falling from $8.40 to approximately $0.81.","source":""},{"date":"2022-04-01","event":"Seedify claims to introduce refund system for launchpad participants, described as a first in the IDO launchpad industry.","source":""},{"date":"2025-09-23","event":"North Korean DPRK-affiliated hackers ('Contagious Interview' campaign) exploit Seedify's SFUND cross-chain bridge on Avalanche via stolen developer private key, draining approximately $1.2–1.7 million. SFUND token collapses approximately 80–99% intraday. An estimated 64,000 token holders affected.","source":""},{"date":"2025-09-23","event":"ZachXBT links theft wallets to DPRK 'Contagious Interview' on-chain forensics. Binance CZ confirms approximately $200,000 frozen at HTX exchange.","source":""},{"date":"2025-10-10","event":"Seedify launches 'Phoenix Raise' — a 24-hour bonding-curve token sale — to recapitalize the platform and relaunch SFUND under a new contract with a 1:1 migration for legacy holders.","source":""},{"date":"2025-11-01","event":"Seedify introduces 'Futarchy Milestones' launch model designed to prevent rug pulls by placing project funds in community-controlled escrow.","source":""},{"date":"2026-01-13","event":"SFUND reaches all-time low of approximately $0.089, down approximately 99.9% from November 2021 peak.","source":""}]},"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 627513af-beb6-4165-be86-e7702f934b19
  2. #2rescoreby systemsystem
    2026-10-10 18:47:48Z
    Score: 28 → 53 (+25)
    Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 28 → 53. Problems weighed by who is responsible: concerns that are not fraud −12.8, incidents the subject suffered −6.4, problems around the subject, caused by others −0.8; legitimacy credit long-running +8.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 455,367,826
    sig
    42o6ogR1CjU4…4yay6BrRexplorer ↗
    hash
    GpdVTg5qxyZ8…HveRZsdrsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (639 B) ▸
    {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-10T18:47:48.735Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"e2374c5c-3048-4ecf-bd6f-7431aaa904a3","new_score":53,"page_slug":"seedify","prev_score":28,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 28 → 53. Problems weighed by who is responsible: concerns that are not fraud −12.8, incidents the subject suffered −6.4, problems around the subject, caused by others −0.8; legitimacy credit long-running +8.","score_delta":25,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 96e87524-4a8d-4d44-8ec1-a659dee35fb1
  3. #3reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-11-02 09:46:21Z
    Score: 53 → 53 (no score change)
    The core incident is well supported: the September 23, 2025 bridge exploit, the compromised developer key, the roughly $1.2M to $1.7M loss, the ZachXBT link to Contagious Interview and the roughly $200K freeze at HTX. The price history is the weakest area. The ATH figure and date do not match the cited CoinLore page ($17.16, December 2021), and the stated all-time low of $0.089 is badly stale given a current price near $0.0015. The 80-99% drop is overstated relative to Decrypt's 35% net figure. The Phoenix Raise date is off by a day, and the ZeroShadow claim was not found in two sources. Many sections' claims (due diligence, scam scores, team allocation) were not checked.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,450,015
    sig
    2ngkx3Y1yJZy…F3RY32hUexplorer ↗
    hash
    85qvjWERYs5c…GzSyEog6sha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1560 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"8e489c0a186916f5f0c1c9c4e792853a","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T09:46:21.933Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.5,"findings_hash":"BtyUDg66V3pmwG4XqedM1bWAiXfTB66pvxju64FGbdzU","investigation_id":"e2374c5c-3048-4ecf-bd6f-7431aaa904a3","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":53,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"4832a5996cb39f59e522371cb7735b3c1acb54e884e6b69eea5e79d578634c2a","page_slug":"seedify","prev_score":53,"reason":"The core incident is well supported: the September 23, 2025 bridge exploit, the compromised developer key, the roughly $1.2M to $1.7M loss, the ZachXBT link to Contagious Interview and the roughly $200K freeze at HTX. The price history is the weakest area. The ATH figure and date do not match the cited CoinLore page ($17.16, December 2021), and the stated all-time low of $0.089 is badly stale given a current price near $0.0015. The 80-99% drop is overstated relative to Decrypt's 35% net figure. The Phoenix Raise date is off by a day, and the ZeroShadow claim was not found in two sources. Many sections' claims (due diligence, scam scores, team allocation) were not checked.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":12,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":true,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 8ef73450-6516-44ca-82c9-03293b288a04
  4. #4review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-11-02 09:46:22Z
    Score: 53 → 53 (no score change)
    About 46% of checkable claims (6 of 13, leaving out one claim whose source blocked the reviewer) were disputed or could not be verified. The price history is the weakest part: the all-time-high price and date do not match the cited CoinLore page (claim_findings[0], [1]), the $0.089 all-time low is stale (claim_findings[2]), and the Phoenix Raise date is off by a day (claim_findings[6]). The core incident, meaning the September 2025 bridge exploit, the compromised developer key, the DPRK attribution and the HTX freeze, is well supported (claim_findings[4]). The reviewer's confidence is moderate and many sections were not checked, so the penalty sits in the middle of the band.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,450,020
    sig
    4NCfD3zZchK3…MmCxz1SYexplorer ↗
    hash
    ExsujGE1Ru2j…oiTJT9cusha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1725 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"8e489c0a186916f5f0c1c9c4e792853a","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T09:46:21.933Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.5,"investigation_id":"e2374c5c-3048-4ecf-bd6f-7431aaa904a3","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":53,"page_slug":"seedify","prev_score":53,"reason":"About 46% of checkable claims (6 of 13, leaving out one claim whose source blocked the reviewer) were disputed or could not be verified. The price history is the weakest part: the all-time-high price and date do not match the cited CoinLore page (claim_findings[0], [1]), the $0.089 all-time low is stale (claim_findings[2]), and the Phoenix Raise date is off by a day (claim_findings[6]). The core incident, meaning the September 2025 bridge exploit, the compromised developer key, the DPRK attribution and the HTX freeze, is well supported (claim_findings[4]). The reviewer's confidence is moderate and many sections were not checked, so the penalty sits in the middle of the band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":12,"sequence_num":4,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"significant","reason":"The review reports a material omission (the token now trades near $0.0015, so the stated $0.089 all-time low is badly out of date) and says the subject status contradicts the page. The percentage band is already significant, so the page is judged in the significant band."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision d8d764f0-bf64-4d5d-9a8a-3e0d4e0348ce
  5. #5rescoreby systemsystem
    2026-11-02 09:46:23Z
    Score: 53 → 57 (+4)
    Recalculated after the fact-check of 2026-11-02. Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 53 → 57. Problems weighed by who is responsible: concerns that are not fraud −12.8, incidents the subject suffered −3.2; legitimacy credit long-running +8; 2 section(s) set aside until a failed fact-check is resolved.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,450,025
    sig
    rGvBYJEBouTB…A8naynxJexplorer ↗
    hash
    2EP5cjSCsbaE…kkpZDC2Dsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (697 B) ▸
    {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-11-02T09:46:21.933Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"e2374c5c-3048-4ecf-bd6f-7431aaa904a3","new_score":57,"page_slug":"seedify","prev_score":53,"reason":"Recalculated after the fact-check of 2026-11-02. Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 53 → 57. Problems weighed by who is responsible: concerns that are not fraud −12.8, incidents the subject suffered −3.2; legitimacy credit long-running +8; 2 section(s) set aside until a failed fact-check is resolved.","score_delta":4,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 45bd5b45-3b4c-449b-a774-90eae2f566f9
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.