Audit log

Every state-changing event for Revert Lend: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-05-29 16:00:06Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 422,970,415

   sig

   4VtvAbweUWeJ…BwUYmbv8copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   3JZuBRWEeRTS…e3RLfxG6copysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (5439 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"4c26ba16-a016-41ac-894d-717867d71117","kind":"publish","page_slug":"revert-lend","published_at":"2026-05-29T16:00:06.694Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Revert Lend","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://docs.revert.finance/revert/revert-lend","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://defillama.com/protocol/revert-lend","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/revertfinance/status/1745127291171053878","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://revoke.cash/exploits/revert","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/lunaray_sec/status/1627684699417251841","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://github.com/liqtags/crypto-rekts/blob/main/rekts/Revert-Finance.md","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://docs.revert.finance/revert/resources/security","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://defillama.com/protocol/revert-lend","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://code4rena.com/reports/2024-03-revert-lend","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://code4rena.com/audits/2024-03-revert-lend","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://code4rena.com/audits/2024-04-revert-lend-mitigation-review","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://docs.revert.finance/revert/resources/security","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.crunchbase.com/person/mario-romero-zavala","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/revert-cb25","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/revertfinance/status/1745127291171053878","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.rootdata.com/Projects/detail/Revert?k=NTQ1MQ%3D%3D","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://airdrops.io/revert-finance/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/revertfinance/status/1948131869058322783","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://revoke.cash/exploits/revert","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://code4rena.com/reports/2024-03-revert-lend","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://defillama.com/protocol/revert-lend","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"Revert Lend is a decentralized lending protocol built by Revert Finance that allows Uniswap v3 liquidity providers to use their LP positions as collateral to borrow ERC-20 tokens. The protocol has experienced two confirmed security incidents: a 2023 exploit of the V3Utils contract resulting in approximately $30,000 in losses, and a January 2026 protocol logic exploit on Base chain resulting in approximately $50,000 in losses. The protocol has undergone multiple audits but the recurrence of exploits raises questions about smart contract security practices.","timeline":[{"date":"2021-01-01","event":"Revert Finance founded in Mexico City by Mario Romero Zavala, initially focused on Uniswap v3 LP analytics tools.","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-01","event":"PeckShield completes audit of Compoundor v1 contract, identifying 2 low-severity issues and 1 informational recommendation.","source":""},{"date":"2023-02-18","event":"V3Utils contract exploited; approximately $30,000 stolen from users via arbitrary code execution abusing token approvals across Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism. ~90% of losses came from a single account. Team restituted all affected users via airdrops.","source":""},{"date":"2023-03-01","event":"PeckShield audits V3Utils contract following the exploit. V3Utils redeployed with enhanced security measures.","source":""},{"date":"2024-01-10","event":"Revert Finance announces Revert Lend, a new lending protocol for Uniswap v3 liquidity providers, via white paper.","source":""},{"date":"2024-03-04","event":"Code4rena competitive audit of Revert Lend begins, running through March 15, 2024 with an $88,500 USDC bounty pool.","source":""},{"date":"2024-03-15","event":"Code4rena audit concludes; 31 unique vulnerabilities identified including 6 high-severity and 27 medium-severity findings.","source":""},{"date":"2024-04-01","event":"Code4rena mitigation review audit for Revert Lend completed, reviewing fixes for all identified issues.","source":""},{"date":"2025-07-24","event":"Revert Finance launches the Revert Points program, rewarding USDC lenders on Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum as a potential precursor to a governance token.","source":""},{"date":"2026-01-29","event":"Revert Lend suffers a protocol logic exploit on Base chain classified as a staked collateral vulnerability; approximately $50,000 lost. Flagged in ZachXBT monitoring.","source":""},{"date":"2026-05-01","event":"Protocol reports approximately $11.19M TVL across Base, Arbitrum, and Ethereum. Revert Lend goes live on Ethereum Mainnet.","source":""}]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 65d877b3-c0f2-4b58-bac9-cc7b3b9d0feccopy
2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-06-03 03:53:50Z
   Score: 48 → 48 (no score change)
   The investigation's core factual claims about Revert Finance's history (founding, V3Utils 2023 exploit, audits) are well-supported by multiple independent sources. The single most significant credibility issue is the claimed January 2026 Base chain exploit for ~$50,000, which cannot be confirmed by any major hack tracker or security source, and the $50,000 figure may be confused with a March 2026 Cantina bug bounty competition pool. Additionally, the Ethereum Mainnet launch is incorrectly dated to May 2026 in the timeline when it demonstrably occurred in June 2025. The page also has a structural problem: all section content fields are empty, meaning the investigation consists only of a summary and timeline with no substantive section narrative.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 423,949,077

   sig

   3SSrgBza2fXq…6tN6hxs1copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   8kx7eSpH8buz…wa48b5Trcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1101 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-03T03:53:50.337Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"4c26ba16-a016-41ac-894d-717867d71117","new_score":48,"page_slug":"revert-lend","prev_score":48,"reason":"The investigation's core factual claims about Revert Finance's history (founding, V3Utils 2023 exploit, audits) are well-supported by multiple independent sources. The single most significant credibility issue is the claimed January 2026 Base chain exploit for ~$50,000, which cannot be confirmed by any major hack tracker or security source, and the $50,000 figure may be confused with a March 2026 Cantina bug bounty competition pool. Additionally, the Ethereum Mainnet launch is incorrectly dated to May 2026 in the timeline when it demonstrably occurred in June 2025. The page also has a structural problem: all section content fields are empty, meaning the investigation consists only of a summary and timeline with no substantive section narrative.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 2353498b-2593-41c1-a3d8-ac9f57ecbe90copy
3. #3review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-06-03 03:53:50Z
   Score: 48 → 33 (-15)
   The reviewer confirmed 8 of 15 claims and found 4 partially supported, but two claims (claim_findings[2] and claim_findings[13]) are unverifiable — both concern the same alleged January 29, 2026 exploit on Base chain for ~$50,000. This is a core security allegation that appears in both the summary and the timeline, yet no major hack tracker, on-chain transaction hash, post-mortem, or ZachXBT alert was located to support it. The reviewer notes the $50,000 figure may be conflated with a March 2026 Cantina bug bounty pool of identical size. Additionally, the Ethereum Mainnet launch date in timeline[10] is incorrectly placed as May 2026 when the confirmed date is June 2025, an 11-month error. Compounding these factual issues, all 7 section content fields are empty, meaning the page has no substantive narrative — a high-priority structural gap. The penalty is set at the top of the 10–30% band given the severity of an unverified exploit claim in the summary, the structural incompleteness, and the confirmed date error.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 423,949,081

   sig

   3QgQnEctVvam…wbLasiPFcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   BiuWRX4pEbHJ…xmTeXwWdcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1380 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-03T03:53:50.337Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"4c26ba16-a016-41ac-894d-717867d71117","new_score":33,"page_slug":"revert-lend","prev_score":48,"reason":"The reviewer confirmed 8 of 15 claims and found 4 partially supported, but two claims (claim_findings[2] and claim_findings[13]) are unverifiable — both concern the same alleged January 29, 2026 exploit on Base chain for ~$50,000. This is a core security allegation that appears in both the summary and the timeline, yet no major hack tracker, on-chain transaction hash, post-mortem, or ZachXBT alert was located to support it. The reviewer notes the $50,000 figure may be conflated with a March 2026 Cantina bug bounty pool of identical size. Additionally, the Ethereum Mainnet launch date in timeline[10] is incorrectly placed as May 2026 when the confirmed date is June 2025, an 11-month error. Compounding these factual issues, all 7 section content fields are empty, meaning the page has no substantive narrative — a high-priority structural gap. The penalty is set at the top of the 10–30% band given the severity of an unverified exploit claim in the summary, the structural incompleteness, and the confirmed date error.","score_delta":-15,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 756eedeb-f521-4dfd-ab59-ab8981cfa516copy