← Polycule4 decisions on this page
Audit log
Every state-changing event for Polycule: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.
- #1publishby system:backfill2026-05-29 02:35:11ZScore: ? → ? (no score change)anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 422,848,492
- sig
3ofXFEmL1yze…TwF5fa9dexplorer ↗- hash
5NdSQZ83sTW9…jU66S1BVsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (6588 B) ▸
{"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"cab37a98-f0d8-4275-8952-7a793b1b5998","kind":"publish","page_slug":"polycule","published_at":"2026-05-29T02:35:11.459Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Polycule","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.mexc.co/price/polycule/info","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://bitkan.com/learn/what-is-polycule-can-a-telegram-bot-revolutionize-prediction-markets-56482","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://phemex.com/news/article/polycule-founder-unveils-pmx-prediction-platform-token-jumps-44-22891","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2209736","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/polycule","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://phemex.com/news/article/polycule-founder-unveils-pmx-prediction-platform-token-jumps-44-22891","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.bitget.site/news/detail/12560605015552","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.gate.com/news/detail/14251663","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/polycule-a-polymarket-based-trading-bot-hit-by-hack-affecting-230-000-in-user-funds","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://phemex.com/news/article/polycule-tg-bot-hacked-230000-in-user-funds-compromised-52040","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2237216","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.odaily.news/en/post/5208756","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/pmx_trade/status/2008942249326071949","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.mexc.com/news/460576","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://bitcoinworld.co.in/polycule-trading-bot-rug-pull-fears/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://phemex.com/news/article/polycule-users-unable-to-withdraw-funds-after-suspected-rug-pull-52868","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/polycule-suspected-rug-pull-as-team-fails-to-resolve-hack-issue","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.weex.com/news/detail/polycule-suspected-rug-pull-team-previously-claimed-hack-attack-305023","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/2bfbf-polycule-trading-bot-rug-pull-fears","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2237216","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.odaily.news/en/post/5208756","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://crypto-ambassador.com/polycule-trading-bot/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.gate.com/post/status/17808297","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/polycule","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinpaprika.com/coin/pcule-polycule/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptorank.io/price/polycule","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://phemex.com/news/article/polycule-tg-bot-hacked-230000-in-user-funds-compromised-52040","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://support.lbank.com/hc/en-gb/articles/47750266239129-World-Premiere-LBank-Futures-Will-Launch-PCULE-Polycule-USDT-Margined-Perpetual-Contract","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.mexc.com/news/460576","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.chainstory.co/the-invisible-ecosystem-who-actually-builds-on-polymarket/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/pmx_trade/status/2008942249326071949","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.bitcoinworld.co.in/polycule-trading-bot-rug-pull-fears/","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"Polycule (ticker: PCULE) is a Telegram-based trading bot built for the Polymarket prediction market platform, operating on Solana and Polygon. Launched in May 2025 by a founder identified as 'krish' and backed by a $560,000 seed from AllianceDAO, the project gained significant traction before its bot was compromised in January 2026, resulting in approximately $230,000 in user funds stolen. Extended team silence following the incident generated widespread rug pull allegations, and ZachXBT has flagged the entity in connection with these concerns.","timeline":[{"date":"2025-05-18","event":"Polycule founder 'krish' launches the PCULE token on Solana via the Bellive platform; market cap reaches approximately $15 million USD at peak.","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-08","event":"Polycule announces a $560,000 seed investment from AllianceDAO, disclosed publicly on X by founder krish.","source":""},{"date":"2025-10-01","event":"Polycule founder krish announces the launch of PMX, a permissionless prediction market platform built in partnership with Meteora. PCULE token is rebranded as PMX; token surges 43.97% within 24 hours to a $22.8 million market cap.","source":""},{"date":"2026-01-07","event":"Polycule team announces a security breach affecting approximately $230,000 in user funds; bot is taken offline. Team promises patches, a security audit, and user reimbursement via Polygon treasury 'before the weekend.'","source":""},{"date":"2026-01-08","event":"KuCoin News and multiple crypto outlets report the hack. PMX Trade posts on X confirming the vulnerability and reimbursement commitment.","source":""},{"date":"2026-01-12","event":"Team's self-imposed deadline passes with no updates, no audit report, and no reimbursements. User withdrawals remain frozen. Competitor Ryan Chi of Insiders.bot publicly declares the situation a confirmed rug pull on X.","source":""},{"date":"2026-01-13","event":"Crypto media (MEXC News, Phemex, WEEX, Cryptorank) cover the developing rug pull accusations. Team remains silent. ZachXBT flagged in connection with the entity.","source":""}]},"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 64160c8f-0b92-49aa-b539-52e7924676e7 - #2rescoreby systemsystem2026-10-27 06:04:54ZScore: 38 → 45 (+7)Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 38 → 45. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −8, concerns that are not fraud −6.4, incidents the subject suffered −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.4.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 461,964,723
- sig
3NLmwou426NZ…J2pueBwvexplorer ↗- hash
9AcMf36KWvq6…5EH2ZKg2sha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (633 B) ▸
{"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-27T06:04:54.019Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"cab37a98-f0d8-4275-8952-7a793b1b5998","new_score":45,"page_slug":"polycule","prev_score":38,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 38 → 45. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −8, concerns that are not fraud −6.4, incidents the subject suffered −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.4.","score_delta":7,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 927376e0-c0a3-4975-abc1-9bb052e2522c - #3reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-10-28 00:53:49ZScore: 45 → 45 (no score change)The core facts check out against Phemex: the AllianceDAO seed, the Oct 2025 PMX rebrand with a 44% surge to $22.8M, and the January 2026 hack of about $230K. The ZachXBT claim in the summary and timeline has no support, and the body admits this. The $57M market cap figure conflicts with the $22.8M figure elsewhere on the page. The current status of the subject could not be determined.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,280,650
- sig
TaALVCwLxZYU…ek3UPTtoexplorer ↗- hash
fW22kkTgy6bn…9wgmFXF3sha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1232 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"345b4d109c5fc9e57ab343061d819d61","decided_at":"2026-10-28T00:53:49.821Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.375,"findings_hash":"G6piTY7P9zdFr3BqcpFgLJw2dFeyPdUyjGzhZBV5MPwX","investigation_id":"cab37a98-f0d8-4275-8952-7a793b1b5998","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":45,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"fc2f91bfbb120df6efbc84bd64dcaffbbd7f9fe2944fdc06b9fd0a7124a90517","page_slug":"polycule","prev_score":45,"reason":"The core facts check out against Phemex: the AllianceDAO seed, the Oct 2025 PMX rebrand with a 44% surge to $22.8M, and the January 2026 hack of about $230K. The ZachXBT claim in the summary and timeline has no support, and the body admits this. The $57M market cap figure conflicts with the $22.8M figure elsewhere on the page. The current status of the subject could not be determined.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 93a88fda-cd6b-4685-be86-4b277ff55c69 - #4review reviseby judgejudge2026-10-28 00:53:50ZScore: 45 → 45 (no score change)Three of eight checked claims (37.5%) were disputed or could not be verified, which puts the page in the significant-issues band. The summary says ZachXBT flagged the entity (claim_findings[0], disputed) and the timeline repeats it (claim_findings[1], no source found), although the page body concedes this is unconfirmed. The $57M market cap figure conflicts with the $22.8M figure elsewhere on the page (claim_findings[5], partially supported), and the post-hack price move could not be reproduced (claim_findings[6]). The core facts (the AllianceDAO seed, the PMX rebrand surge, the roughly $230K hack and the team's silence) were confirmed, and the reviewer's confidence was moderate-to-low, so the penalty is set in the lower part of the band. Coverage gaps remain on primary sources and post-January 2026 status.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,280,654
- sig
4unRBiDJ8dEG…unJwjkKWexplorer ↗- hash
6v2D7yN3tVXw…qie2zUipsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1459 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"345b4d109c5fc9e57ab343061d819d61","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-28T00:53:49.821Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.375,"investigation_id":"cab37a98-f0d8-4275-8952-7a793b1b5998","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":45,"page_slug":"polycule","prev_score":45,"reason":"Three of eight checked claims (37.5%) were disputed or could not be verified, which puts the page in the significant-issues band. The summary says ZachXBT flagged the entity (claim_findings[0], disputed) and the timeline repeats it (claim_findings[1], no source found), although the page body concedes this is unconfirmed. The $57M market cap figure conflicts with the $22.8M figure elsewhere on the page (claim_findings[5], partially supported), and the post-hack price move could not be reproduced (claim_findings[6]). The core facts (the AllianceDAO seed, the PMX rebrand surge, the roughly $230K hack and the team's silence) were confirmed, and the reviewer's confidence was moderate-to-low, so the penalty is set in the lower part of the band. Coverage gaps remain on primary sources and post-January 2026 status.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 10bb3aec-45a2-49ab-95a4-5143611be8ee
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine —
python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.