Audit log

Every state-changing event for Pokemon: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-05-14 06:03:16Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 419,629,139

   sig

   3fGzN6WnugrX…T7trz7Hvcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   EJfbPseQUNiw…TrnbWXzZcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (8016 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"ae175d81-1ef5-4db8-a3ab-49868a08fd36","kind":"publish","page_slug":"pokemon","published_at":"2026-05-14T06:03:16.009Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Pokemon","sections":[{"content":"<cite index=\"2-2,2-8\">The Federal Court of Australia issued a broad injunction against Pokemon Pty Ltd and Kotiota Studios in December 2022 for creating an unauthorized NFT game called 'PokéWorld' that misused Pokemon trademarks and characters.</cite> <cite index=\"2-4,2-5\">Kotiota had falsely represented themselves as contractors for The Pokemon Company, claiming involvement in developing Pokemon Scarlet and Violet, Pokemon Home, and Pokemon Sleep, and even alleged that Pokemon owned 8% of Kotiota.</cite> <cite index=\"14-3,14-4\">The Pokemon Company International explicitly stated that they, The Pokemon Company, and Nintendo had made a deliberate decision not to launch any Pokemon NFTs, and denied any involvement with Kotiota.</cite>","heading":"Unauthorized NFT and Cryptocurrency Projects","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Bulbagarden court case report on Pokemon NFT lawsuit","type":"community_report","url":"https://bulbagarden.net/threads/tpci-used-lawsuit-its-super-effective-pokemon-takes-crypto-fraudsters-to-court-for-misuse-of-pokemon-characters-and-trademarks-in-nft-game-scam.295609/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Game Developer report on Pokemon Company NFT lawsuit","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/the-pokemon-company-files-suit-over-unauthorized-pokemon-nft-game"}]},{"content":"<cite index=\"1-1,1-2\">At least 477 cases of Pokemon trading card scams have been reported since October 2025, with losses totaling at least $958,000, according to authorities in Singapore who warned that scammers are exploiting excitement around new set releases.</cite> <cite index=\"5-3,5-4,5-6\">In May 2024, federal authorities arrested Anthony Curcio and Iosif Bondarchuk for a $2 million fraud scheme involving inflated prices of collectible cards, including Pokemon cards, with one Michael Jordan card sold for $171,000 when it was worth between $6,000 and $7,000.</cite> <cite index=\"3-5,3-6,3-10\">A separate investigation in 2025 revealed alleged prototype Pokemon card fraud involving thousands of potentially forged cards, with one prototype Pikachu card selling for $24,400, potentially involving millions of dollars in fraudulent sales since 2024.</cite>","heading":"Trading Card Scams and Fraud","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Bitdefender Pokemon card scam report","type":"research","url":"https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/hotforsecurity/pokemon-card-scams-2026"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Newsweek federal fraud case report","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.newsweek.com/pokemon-sports-trading-cards-fraud-scheme-arrests-1906522"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CBR Pokemon TCG prototype scam investigation","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cbr.com/pokemon-tcg-prototype-card-scam/"}]},{"content":"<cite index=\"6-4,6-5,6-6\">Singapore police reported at least seven job scam cases since January 2026 involving fake online tasks linked to digital Pokemon trading cards, with victims losing S$51,600 after being induced to deposit cryptocurrency on fraudulent websites.</cite> <cite index=\"6-20,6-21,6-22,6-25,6-28,6-29\">The scam involved victims selecting digital Pokemon cards on fraudulent websites and being told they would earn commissions based on card values, but when victims tried to withdraw their supposed earnings, the withdrawals could not be completed and website operators became uncontactable.</cite>","heading":"Cryptocurrency Job Scams","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"The Online Citizen Singapore police advisory","type":"news_article","url":"https://theonlinecitizen.com/2026/02/06/police-warn-of-commission-based-pokemon-trading-card-scams-causing-s-51-600-losses-in-jan-2026"}]},{"content":"<cite index=\"1-11,1-13,1-15,1-17\">Scammers have created counterfeit Pokemon cards inserted into fake graded slabs sold as premium collectibles, fake Pokemon merchandise and anniversary collectibles, and use the Pokemon brand to steal credentials through phishing attacks that can lead to stolen logins or malware infections.</cite> <cite index=\"16-2,16-3,16-4\">The Pokemon Company was alerted to fraudulent activities when Kotiota's legal department contacted media organizations requesting to be credited as Pokemon developers, claiming intellectual property rights related to Pokemon video games.</cite>","heading":"Counterfeit Merchandise and Brand Misuse","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Bitdefender Pokemon scam analysis","type":"research","url":"https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/hotforsecurity/pokemon-card-scams-2026"},{"credibility":2,"name":"GamesRadar Pokemon NFT fraud investigation","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.gamesradar.com/crypto-bros-lie-about-pokemon-nfts-get-smacked-down-by-the-real-pokemon-company/"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Bitdefender Pokemon card scam analysis","type":"research","url":"https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/hotforsecurity/pokemon-card-scams-2026"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bulbagarden NFT lawsuit report","type":"community_report","url":"https://bulbagarden.net/threads/tpci-used-lawsuit-its-super-effective-pokemon-takes-crypto-fraudsters-to-court-for-misuse-of-pokemon-characters-and-trademarks-in-nft-game-scam.295609/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Newsweek federal fraud case","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.newsweek.com/pokemon-sports-trading-cards-fraud-scheme-arrests-1906522"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Singapore police advisory","type":"news_article","url":"https://theonlinecitizen.com/2026/02/06/police-warn-of-commission-based-pokemon-trading-card-scams-causing-s-51-600-losses-in-jan-2026"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CBR prototype card fraud investigation","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cbr.com/pokemon-tcg-prototype-card-scam/"}],"summary":"Pokemon itself is a legitimate intellectual property owned by The Pokemon Company International, Nintendo, and Game Freak. However, the brand has been extensively exploited in various scam operations including fraudulent NFT projects, trading card fraud schemes, counterfeit merchandise sales, and cryptocurrency investment scams that have collectively resulted in millions of dollars in losses.","timeline":[{"date":"2022-08-25","event":"Kotiota Studios contacted media claiming to be Pokemon developers","source":"GamesRadar","source_url":"https://www.gamesradar.com/crypto-bros-lie-about-pokemon-nfts-get-smacked-down-by-the-real-pokemon-company/"},{"date":"2022-12-21","event":"Australian Federal Court issued injunction against Pokemon Pty Ltd for NFT fraud","source":"Bulbagarden","source_url":"https://bulbagarden.net/threads/tpci-used-lawsuit-its-super-effective-pokemon-takes-crypto-fraudsters-to-court-for-misuse-of-pokemon-characters-and-trademarks-in-nft-game-scam.295609/"},{"date":"2024-05-31","event":"Federal arrests in $2 million Pokemon and sports card fraud scheme","source":"Newsweek","source_url":"https://www.newsweek.com/pokemon-sports-trading-cards-fraud-scheme-arrests-1906522"},{"date":"2025-01-28","event":"Investigation revealed alleged Pokemon prototype card fraud involving millions","source":"CBR","source_url":"https://www.cbr.com/pokemon-tcg-prototype-card-scam/"},{"date":"2025-10-01","event":"477 Pokemon trading card scams reported with $958,000 in losses","source":"Bitdefender","source_url":"https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/hotforsecurity/pokemon-card-scams-2026"},{"date":"2026-01-01","event":"Singapore police warn of cryptocurrency job scams using Pokemon cards","source":"The Online Citizen","source_url":"https://theonlinecitizen.com/2026/02/06/police-warn-of-commission-based-pokemon-trading-card-scams-causing-s-51-600-losses-in-jan-2026"}]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 7e9e2cc3-9578-4103-a269-b42d2214678acopy
2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-06-03 01:17:31Z
   Score: 85 → 85 (no score change)
   The page's core factual claims are well-supported across multiple credible sources including official government advisories, Department of Justice press releases, and primary court records. The four partially-supported findings involve minor characterization issues (ownership structure omitting Creatures Inc., 'thousands' vs 'hundreds' of prototype cards, $171,000 listed price vs actual sale amount, and an 8-day date discrepancy in the Curcio arrest timeline) rather than substantive errors. No claims are disputed or unverifiable. A notable gap is the missing conviction outcome for the Curcio/Bondarchuk case, which page treats as still at the arrest stage when Curcio was subsequently convicted at trial.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 423,925,544

   sig

   5s7Gf5PCa6Rc…W1HT81kScopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   7DACQDanwhhb…aNDb17p5copysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1054 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-03T01:17:31.284Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"ae175d81-1ef5-4db8-a3ab-49868a08fd36","new_score":85,"page_slug":"pokemon","prev_score":85,"reason":"The page's core factual claims are well-supported across multiple credible sources including official government advisories, Department of Justice press releases, and primary court records. The four partially-supported findings involve minor characterization issues (ownership structure omitting Creatures Inc., 'thousands' vs 'hundreds' of prototype cards, $171,000 listed price vs actual sale amount, and an 8-day date discrepancy in the Curcio arrest timeline) rather than substantive errors. No claims are disputed or unverifiable. A notable gap is the missing conviction outcome for the Curcio/Bondarchuk case, which page treats as still at the arrest stage when Curcio was subsequently convicted at trial.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 603ee16f-928b-42f8-9675-2c4945f1a75dcopy
3. #3review approveby judgejudge

   2026-06-03 01:17:31Z
   Score: 85 → 85 (no score change)
   The reviewer found 0 disputed claims across 21 total findings, placing this page firmly in the approval band. All 4 partially-supported findings (claim_findings[0], claim_findings[9], claim_findings[10], claim_findings[18]) involve minor characterization issues — an omitted co-owner (Creatures Inc.), 'thousands' vs 'hundreds' of prototype cards, an asking-price vs. sale-price framing, and an 8-day date discrepancy — none of which undermine the page's core allegations. Core claims about the Australian Federal Court injunction, Singapore police figures, DOJ arrests, and Kotiota's false representations are each confirmed by Tier 1 sources including official government advisories and a Department of Justice press release. Coverage gaps are medium or low priority and suggest expansion, not correction.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 423,925,548

   sig

   5XV6YYF6B1nc…oFS73Dixcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   523HRYgJ4ErA…G1MWttfBcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1155 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-03T01:17:31.284Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"ae175d81-1ef5-4db8-a3ab-49868a08fd36","new_score":85,"page_slug":"pokemon","prev_score":85,"reason":"The reviewer found 0 disputed claims across 21 total findings, placing this page firmly in the approval band. All 4 partially-supported findings (claim_findings[0], claim_findings[9], claim_findings[10], claim_findings[18]) involve minor characterization issues — an omitted co-owner (Creatures Inc.), 'thousands' vs 'hundreds' of prototype cards, an asking-price vs. sale-price framing, and an 8-day date discrepancy — none of which undermine the page's core allegations. Core claims about the Australian Federal Court injunction, Singapore police figures, DOJ arrests, and Kotiota's false representations are each confirmed by Tier 1 sources including official government advisories and a Department of Justice press release. Coverage gaps are medium or low priority and suggest expansion, not correction.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision a3878fa9-e13f-4493-ab41-473b3cd70635copy
4. #4rescoreby systemsystem

   2026-10-10 18:50:46Z
   Score: 85 → 73 (-12)
   Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 85 → 73. Problems weighed by who is responsible: problems around the subject, caused by others −5.6; legitimacy credit long-running +6.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 455,370,897

   sig

   2uUWtotKTBoQ…HL3AuiaQcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   3qcHNhY74xEz…tYmjx8sicopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (568 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-10T18:50:46.126Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"ae175d81-1ef5-4db8-a3ab-49868a08fd36","new_score":73,"page_slug":"pokemon","prev_score":85,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 85 → 73. Problems weighed by who is responsible: problems around the subject, caused by others −5.6; legitimacy credit long-running +6.","score_delta":-12,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision a4edf5c9-5426-4def-8a73-261ba5ff6e62copy
5. #5reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-17 00:42:10Z
   Score: 73 → 73 (no score change)
   The page is well-sourced and most claims hold up against independent verification, including the Federal Court of Australia injunction against Kotiota Studios/Pokemon Pty Ltd (confirmed against the primary judgment [2022] FCA 1561), the Curcio/Bondarchuk trading-card fraud case, the CBR prototype-card-fraud reporting, and the Singapore Police job-scam advisory. The main defect is a now-stale statistic: the '477 cases / $958,000' Singapore trading-card-scam tally (appearing in both a section and the timeline) was accurate as of a December 2025 police advisory but has been superseded by a 6 February 2026 police release putting the same window at 609 cases and $1.1 million. The summary also misstates Pokemon's corporate ownership, naming 'The Pokemon Company International' (a regional subsidiary) rather than The Pokemon Company (the actual joint venture) and omitting Creatures Inc. as a co-owner. One claim about Kotiota 'claiming intellectual property rights' is a modest overstatement of its cited source, which describes a request for developer credit rather than an IP claim. No accepted community submissions were present to review. The page's crypto-risk framing would benefit from coverage of blockchain-native impersonation (fake Pokemon tokens/memecoins), which is currently absent.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 457,841,109

   sig

   mZx1obzkWujS…YMT1HeGrcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   JCcC8H6y27Wb…rk9MfdyHcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1894 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"b24b7567c7f2a547e218a13e984d2395","decided_at":"2026-10-17T00:42:10.260Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.0625,"findings_hash":"B6JnPo7P7mmYBUxz2ddSFyF3oerbkn82xR7fqXUFtzEX","investigation_id":"ae175d81-1ef5-4db8-a3ab-49868a08fd36","mode":"findings_only","new_score":73,"page_content_hash":"8da4a7e8abbc2cbbf31a8433cd42ce01a639420aa7af78a7b8adb11f53521ad9","page_slug":"pokemon","prev_score":73,"reason":"The page is well-sourced and most claims hold up against independent verification, including the Federal Court of Australia injunction against Kotiota Studios/Pokemon Pty Ltd (confirmed against the primary judgment [2022] FCA 1561), the Curcio/Bondarchuk trading-card fraud case, the CBR prototype-card-fraud reporting, and the Singapore Police job-scam advisory. The main defect is a now-stale statistic: the '477 cases / $958,000' Singapore trading-card-scam tally (appearing in both a section and the timeline) was accurate as of a December 2025 police advisory but has been superseded by a 6 February 2026 police release putting the same window at 609 cases and $1.1 million. The summary also misstates Pokemon's corporate ownership, naming 'The Pokemon Company International' (a regional subsidiary) rather than The Pokemon Company (the actual joint venture) and omitting Creatures Inc. as a co-owner. One claim about Kotiota 'claiming intellectual property rights' is a modest overstatement of its cited source, which describes a request for developer credit rather than an IP claim. No accepted community submissions were present to review. The page's crypto-risk framing would benefit from coverage of blockchain-native impersonation (fake Pokemon tokens/memecoins), which is currently absent.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 6ffdbb55-03ca-45c1-a8ef-b5e460ac1b81copy
6. #6reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-17 02:06:17Z
   Score: 73 → 73 (no score change)
   The page's core factual claims are well supported by independently verifiable sources: the 2022 Australian Federal Court injunction against Kotiota Studios/Pokemon Pty Ltd, the false contractor claims, TPCi's no-NFT statement, the Curcio/Bondarchuk card-grading fraud scheme and card values, the 2025 prototype-card fraud allegations, and the Singapore Police Force cryptocurrency job-scam advisory all check out against primary or credible secondary sources. Two defects stand out: the arrest/unsealing date for Curcio and Bondarchuk is recorded as 2024-05-31 when DOJ and secondary reporting place it on 2024-05-23, and the headline Singapore trading-card-scam tally (477 cases/$958,000) was already superseded by the Singapore Police Force's own February 2026 release (609 cases/$1.1 million) before the page's cited Bitdefender article was even published, making that figure stale in two places (a section and its matching timeline entry). The page also has no coverage of a 2026 incident in which the official Pokemon social account was hijacked to promote a fake memecoin — a materially relevant gap for a crypto-focused investigation — nor of the 2022 Animoon rug pull or the Kotiota case's 2023 follow-up judgment.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 457,864,391

   sig

   5mSwmymKrPp2…pAvLYojYcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   Fnn15trHq9Zt…F9nkBpXncopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1814 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"8a7e91dbbcd01569d63130a2a513e128","decided_at":"2026-10-17T02:06:16.832Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.125,"findings_hash":"B7xTWPbWkszje9yhpUAVKByS9162PKdz8XG7tsr82Mh6","investigation_id":"ae175d81-1ef5-4db8-a3ab-49868a08fd36","mode":"findings_only","new_score":73,"page_content_hash":"8da4a7e8abbc2cbbf31a8433cd42ce01a639420aa7af78a7b8adb11f53521ad9","page_slug":"pokemon","prev_score":73,"reason":"The page's core factual claims are well supported by independently verifiable sources: the 2022 Australian Federal Court injunction against Kotiota Studios/Pokemon Pty Ltd, the false contractor claims, TPCi's no-NFT statement, the Curcio/Bondarchuk card-grading fraud scheme and card values, the 2025 prototype-card fraud allegations, and the Singapore Police Force cryptocurrency job-scam advisory all check out against primary or credible secondary sources. Two defects stand out: the arrest/unsealing date for Curcio and Bondarchuk is recorded as 2024-05-31 when DOJ and secondary reporting place it on 2024-05-23, and the headline Singapore trading-card-scam tally (477 cases/$958,000) was already superseded by the Singapore Police Force's own February 2026 release (609 cases/$1.1 million) before the page's cited Bitdefender article was even published, making that figure stale in two places (a section and its matching timeline entry). The page also has no coverage of a 2026 incident in which the official Pokemon social account was hijacked to promote a fake memecoin — a materially relevant gap for a crypto-focused investigation — nor of the 2022 Animoon rug pull or the Kotiota case's 2023 follow-up judgment.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 6e5bd243-a7c7-4035-8692-97859ac40dedcopy