Audit log

Every state-changing event for OlaXBT: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-05-27 20:21:13Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 422,573,682

   sig

   2ZxWmz7U1mxe…fjUYD8uRcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   7Kx9VsMiz2ht…BBWrwwHGcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (5185 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"a5855531-4995-4a21-8695-e3d53b9a3ea9","kind":"publish","page_slug":"olaxbt","published_at":"2026-05-27T20:21:13.316Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"OlaXBT","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/olaxbt","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/olaxbt/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://olaxbt-docs.gitbook.io/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://skynet.certik.com/projects/olaxbt","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/cmc-ai/olaxbt/latest-updates/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/month-in-review-top-defi-hacks-of-september-2025","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/cmc-ai/olaxbt/what-is/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://skynet.certik.com/projects/olaxbt","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/olaxbt/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptorank.io/ico/olaxbt","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://skynet.certik.com/projects/olaxbt","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://olaxbt-docs.gitbook.io/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://icoanalytics.org/projects/olaxbt/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.ainvest.com/news/olaxbt-secures-3-38-million-seed-funding-led-amber-group-ai-driven-crypto-trading-2507/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://icoanalytics.org/projects/olaxbt/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/binance/status/1951546007256170825","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://blog.kraken.com/product/asset-listings/aio-is-available-for-trading","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/cmc-ai/olaxbt/latest-updates/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/olaxbt/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.kraken.com/prices/olaxbt","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://t.me/investigations","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/zachxbt","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"OlaXBT (ticker: AIO) is a BNB Smart Chain-based AI trading platform that raised $3.38 million in seed funding led by Amber Group and launched publicly in July 2025. The project suffered a confirmed multi-signature wallet breach on September 1, 2025 that resulted in the theft of approximately 32 million AIO tokens (estimated $2 million at the time), forcing an emergency token contract migration that several exchanges declined to support. Additional risk factors include extreme holder concentration (approximately 96% of supply held by two addresses per CertiK Skynet data), an anonymous founding team with unverifiable claimed credentials, and multiple exchange delistings citing security concerns.","timeline":[{"date":"2025-07-06","event":"OlaXBT completes seed funding round of $3.38 million led by Amber Group, with DWF Ventures and other participants.","source":""},{"date":"2025-07-09","event":"OlaXBT platform officially launches publicly, reporting over 120,000 users globally.","source":""},{"date":"2025-08-02","event":"AIO token listed on Binance Alpha as its first featured listing, with a 750 AIO airdrop for users holding 200+ Alpha Points. KuCoin also lists AIO on the same date.","source":""},{"date":"2025-09-01","event":"Multi-signature wallet breach occurs. Approximately 32 million AIO tokens (estimated value over $2 million) are stolen. Team begins emergency migration to a new token contract.","source":""},{"date":"2025-09-18","event":"AIO token reaches its all-time high of approximately $0.2047, paradoxically occurring after the hack was disclosed.","source":""},{"date":"2025-09-01","event":"Poloniex and OrangeX decline to support the AIO token contract migration and delist AIO trading pairs, citing security concerns.","source":""},{"date":"2025-11-04","event":"AIO Nexus OS Portal launches, described as a new command center with AI agents accessing real-time data feeds.","source":""},{"date":"2025-11-14","event":"OlaXBT (AIO) listed on Kraken, expanding its global exchange presence.","source":""},{"date":"2025-12-14","event":"Falcon Finance launches an AIO staking vault on BNB Chain offering 20–35% APR paid in USDf.","source":""},{"date":"2025-12-31","event":"MGBX delists AIO/USDT trading pair. Withdrawals close January 3, 2026.","source":""}]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision e3698e38-cb98-4790-af33-b21789d28f43copy
2. #2rescoreby systemsystem

   2026-10-27 06:07:23Z
   Score: 28 → 47 (+19)
   Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 28 → 47. Problems weighed by who is responsible: concerns that are not fraud −12.8, incidents the subject suffered −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −1.6.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 461,966,643

   sig

   24MwtiMmjES5…C2PkmiPzcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   23vtBtU6bFLd…9HKRbrZxcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (603 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-27T06:07:23.558Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"a5855531-4995-4a21-8695-e3d53b9a3ea9","new_score":47,"page_slug":"olaxbt","prev_score":28,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 28 → 47. Problems weighed by who is responsible: concerns that are not fraud −12.8, incidents the subject suffered −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −1.6.","score_delta":19,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 72c2054f-e399-4b84-92ab-6fd75d109f0ecopy
3. #3reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-11-02 00:12:33Z
   Score: 47 → 47 (no score change)
   The core breach facts (about 32M AIO, about $2M, September 2025) hold up. The ATH and drawdown figures are stale against current CoinGecko data. The Poloniex, OrangeX and MGBX delisting claims are not in the cited CoinMarketCap page. Several sources were blocked, so only a small sample could be checked. The project is operating and no critical omissions were found.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,289,394

   sig

   2K9X4gmjhSuq…Mu1RCwQ6copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   JD3CT6xLd3Yd…WxZ6URdMcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1249 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"1de1ef362382a09745b226f87d062efd","blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T00:12:33.001Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1667,"findings_hash":"2aEDfA9SJGSppJZctxy923J4LibFcuabP473ArGuscDx","investigation_id":"a5855531-4995-4a21-8695-e3d53b9a3ea9","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":47,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"8651994f01948cbc304280406c82d7e330a53f0c8b017a84b1759ebd1e61bc65","page_slug":"olaxbt","prev_score":47,"reason":"The core breach facts (about 32M AIO, about $2M, September 2025) hold up. The ATH and drawdown figures are stale against current CoinGecko data. The Poloniex, OrangeX and MGBX delisting claims are not in the cited CoinMarketCap page. Several sources were blocked, so only a small sample could be checked. The project is operating and no critical omissions were found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":6,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 2600ee70-7b60-45aa-8bc3-793c7cf7c143copy
4. #4review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-11-02 00:12:33Z
   Score: 47 → 47 (no score change)
   The core breach facts (about 32M AIO stolen, about $2M, September 2025) and the supply figures were confirmed (claim_findings[2], [6]). Of the 6 claims that could be checked (2 were excluded because the sources blocked the reviewer), 1 could not be verified: the Poloniex, OrangeX and MGBX delisting claim is not in its cited CoinMarketCap page (claim_findings[3]), which gives about 17% and the minor-issues band. Two further findings are stale rather than disputed: the all-time-high and 51% drawdown figures no longer match current CoinGecko data (claim_findings[0], [1]). The reviewer also flagged high-priority gaps in primary incident sourcing and on-chain evidence, so the page is revised and not approved. The penalty is kept moderate because the reviewer's confidence was low and the project is still operating with no contradicting status.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,289,399

   sig

   5kFuMZ96BPQP…jX4zvQ7vcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   9aiCKZTKQXnp…oYzpFchBcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1525 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"1de1ef362382a09745b226f87d062efd","band_override":null,"blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T00:12:33.001Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1667,"investigation_id":"a5855531-4995-4a21-8695-e3d53b9a3ea9","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":47,"page_slug":"olaxbt","prev_score":47,"reason":"The core breach facts (about 32M AIO stolen, about $2M, September 2025) and the supply figures were confirmed (claim_findings[2], [6]). Of the 6 claims that could be checked (2 were excluded because the sources blocked the reviewer), 1 could not be verified: the Poloniex, OrangeX and MGBX delisting claim is not in its cited CoinMarketCap page (claim_findings[3]), which gives about 17% and the minor-issues band. Two further findings are stale rather than disputed: the all-time-high and 51% drawdown figures no longer match current CoinGecko data (claim_findings[0], [1]). The reviewer also flagged high-priority gaps in primary incident sourcing and on-chain evidence, so the page is revised and not approved. The penalty is kept moderate because the reviewer's confidence was low and the project is still operating with no contradicting status.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":6,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 29a89b74-3c78-416d-977c-3acd3ae01f0fcopy
5. #5rescoreby systemsystem

   2026-11-02 00:12:34Z
   Score: 47 → 51 (+4)
   Recalculated after the fact-check of 2026-11-02. Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 47 → 51. Problems weighed by who is responsible: concerns that are not fraud −9.6, incidents the subject suffered −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −0.8; 2 section(s) set aside until a failed fact-check is resolved.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 464,289,404

   sig

   2C4nBuPvtpf1…2fZnkeZLcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   3wsXqg2GjbvT…kChnzAYhcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (712 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-11-02T00:12:33.001Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"a5855531-4995-4a21-8695-e3d53b9a3ea9","new_score":51,"page_slug":"olaxbt","prev_score":47,"reason":"Recalculated after the fact-check of 2026-11-02. Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 47 → 51. Problems weighed by who is responsible: concerns that are not fraud −9.6, incidents the subject suffered −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −0.8; 2 section(s) set aside until a failed fact-check is resolved.","score_delta":4,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 2a0b1c86-345a-4348-80dc-64f413e896b9copy