Skip to main content
Sign in

Audit log

Every state-changing event for MiCA Transition Impersonation Scam Wave 2026: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

  1. #1publishby system:backfill
    2026-08-26 23:18:41Z
    Score: ?? (no score change)
    anchorpending
    chain
    hash
    6bEkMDSi2Z4A…fYMzQdo5sha256 → base58
    verifying row…
    canonical bytes (21326 B) ▸
    {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"1620215f-f081-449c-b8c1-deed771b06ff","kind":"publish","page_slug":"mica-transition-impersonation-scam-wave-2026","published_at":"2026-08-26T23:18:41.748Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"MiCA Transition Impersonation Scam Wave 2026","sections":[{"content":"The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) became fully applicable on December 30, 2024, with a maximum transitional period for existing operators that expired on July 1, 2026. At that deadline, only approximately 323 firms appeared on ESMA's official interim MiCA register of authorized Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs). Industry estimates suggest over 1,700 entities were required to halt or substantially restrict crypto services to EU customers, potentially affecting as many as 10 million retail users who needed to move digital assets to licensed alternatives. This created a window in which legitimate migration notices from real exchanges overlapped with fraudulent imitation communications — a condition multiple EU regulators described as unusually favorable for fraud. France's AMF executive director Stephane Pontoizeau stated the transition created 'an opportunity for scammers more than usual.' The AMF reportedly declined to impose hard migration deadlines precisely to avoid manufacturing false urgency that criminals could exploit.","heading":"Regulatory Background and Scam Opportunity","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: How the EU's new crypto rules triggered a massive scam wave","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/08/14/mica-s-cleanup-is-creating-a-new-scam-wave-across-the-european-union"},{"credibility":2,"name":"FinanceFeeds: EU Regulators Warn of MiCA Migration Scams as 1,700 Crypto Platforms Face EU Exit","type":"news_article","url":"https://financefeeds.com/eu-regulators-warn-of-mica-migration-scams-as-1700-crypto-platforms-face-eu-exit/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Cryptopolitan: EU warns of crypto scams after MiCA compliance deadline","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptopolitan.com/eu-warns-crypto-scams-mica-deadline/"}]},{"content":"The scam wave employs several overlapping tactics, each exploiting the legitimacy of genuine MiCA wind-down communications. The primary vector involves fraudsters contacting users of unlicensed exchanges — via email, phone, text message, or social media — while posing as staff of a regulatory authority or a licensed exchange. Victims are told their assets will be frozen or lost unless they immediately verify their account or transfer funds to a 'compliant' platform, which is in fact a fake website or a wallet address controlled by the criminals. ESMA confirmed that scammers have misused its official name, branding, and logo, including through fabricated MiCA authorization documents and spoofed regulatory communications. France's AMF reported cases where criminals specifically impersonated AMF employees to direct users toward fraudulent transfer portals. Common specific tactics identified by regulators and analysts include: cloned websites that visually replicate official exchange or regulatory pages; counterfeit regulatory documents bearing official seals and signatures; fabricated case reference numbers to create an appearance of an ongoing compliance review; demands for 'seed phrases' or private keys under the guise of 'account verification'; requests for an upfront 'administrative fee' or 'verification transfer' of cryptocurrency; and use of artificial urgency, such as account closure deadlines measured in hours. Regulators uniformly emphasize that legitimate authorities never request seed phrases, private keys, passwords, or cryptocurrency transfers for compliance purposes.","heading":"Scam Mechanics and Tactics","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoTimes: Scammers Pose as Regulators to Exploit EU's MiCA Wind-Down, Watchdogs Warn","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/08/06/scammers-pose-as-regulators-to-exploit-eus-mica-wind-down-watchdogs-warn/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Coindoo: MiCA Scammers Target EU Crypto Users During Exchange Closures","type":"news_article","url":"https://coindoo.com/mica-scammers-target-eu-crypto-users/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Coin-Turk: ESMA warns of MiCA scam surge as fraudsters impersonate EU crypto regulators","type":"news_article","url":"https://en.coin-turk.com/esma-warns-of-mica-scam-surge-as-fraudsters-impersonate-eu-crypto-regulators/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinMarketCap: MiCA Deadline Triggers Fraud Wave as Scammers Pose as EU Watchdogs","type":"news_article","url":"https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/mica-deadline-scams-eu-regulators-crypto"}]},{"content":"Confirmed impersonation targets, as reported by the authorities themselves or by major news outlets, include: the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), which confirmed scammers misused its logo and identity in phishing campaigns; France's Autorite des Marches Financiers (AMF), which reported criminals posing as its staff to redirect users to fake transfer portals; the Dutch Autoriteit Financiele Markten (AFM), which noted criminals actively targeting investors searching for new licensed providers; and Belgium's Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA), which raised public awareness about unauthorized crypto businesses during the transition period. Licensed exchanges including Coinbase, Kraken, and OKX — which obtained MiCA authorization and actively marketed to displaced users — have also reportedly been impersonated, given their prominence as the primary legitimate destinations for migrating EU users. Binance, the largest platform to fail EU authorization, was not itself confirmed as an impersonation target in public reports, though its displaced user base of an estimated 450 million global users (with a substantial EU segment) represented a prime victim pool. No specific perpetrator organizations or individuals have been publicly named or charged as of the date of this investigation.","heading":"Entities Impersonated","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"The Block: EU watchdogs warn scammers are posing as crypto firms and regulators after MiCA deadline","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/news/regulation/2026-08-06-eu-watchdogs-warn-crypto-scams-mica-410966"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Yahoo Finance: Scammers Pose as EU Regulators to Prey on MiCA Deadline Fallout","type":"news_article","url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/scammers-pose-eu-regulators-prey-124619269.html"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: Coinbase and OKX try to lure in Binance's EU users after it failed to secure a MiCA license","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/06/27/coinbase-and-okx-try-to-lure-in-binance-s-450m-eu-users-after-failing-to-secure-a-mica-license"}]},{"content":"The primary victims are EU retail investors who held accounts on exchanges that did not obtain MiCA authorization by July 1, 2026. Industry estimates place the displaced user population at up to 10 million people across EU member states, all simultaneously searching for compliant alternatives. This population was particularly vulnerable because many were simultaneously receiving legitimate migration or wind-down notices from their actual exchanges, making it difficult to distinguish genuine communications from fraudulent imitations. No aggregate loss figures specific to MiCA-themed scams have been published as of August 2026. For broader context, Chainalysis estimated global crypto scam and fraud losses at approximately $17 billion in 2025, up from roughly $6 billion five years prior, with impersonation fraud identified as among the fastest-growing categories. The MiCA scam wave is a subset of that broader trend, not an independently measured figure.","heading":"Victim Profile and Scale","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Blockonomi: Cryptocurrency Scams Surge Across EU Following MiCA Licensing Transition","type":"news_article","url":"https://blockonomi.com/cryptocurrency-scams-surge-across-eu-following-mica-licensing-transition/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: How the EU's new crypto rules triggered a massive scam wave","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/08/14/mica-s-cleanup-is-creating-a-new-scam-wave-across-the-european-union"}]},{"content":"Multiple European financial authorities issued formal public warnings about this scam wave between July and August 2026. ESMA stated it was aware of criminals misusing its name, logo, and branding — including through falsified documents — and explicitly noted that ESMA does not contact investors to reclaim lost funds or request administrative fees. ESMA also confirmed that official ESMA emails use only the @esma.europa.eu domain. France's AMF issued alerts describing cases where criminals impersonated AMF employees to direct users to fraudulent transfer portals. The Dutch AFM warned investors actively searching for new licensed providers were being specifically targeted. Belgium's FSMA issued public awareness notices. PYMNTS.com and other outlets reported that EU crypto scam warnings from these bodies were coordinated following reporting by the Financial Times on August 6, 2026. ESMA advised users to: verify any claimed exchange or provider against the official interim MiCA register before transferring assets; independently navigate to official websites by typing known addresses directly rather than following links in messages; never disclose seed phrases, private keys, or authentication codes to any third party; and treat any unsolicited urgency about account compliance as a red flag requiring independent verification.","heading":"Regulatory Warnings and Official Guidance","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Coin-Turk: ESMA warns of MiCA scam surge as fraudsters impersonate EU crypto regulators","type":"news_article","url":"https://en.coin-turk.com/esma-warns-of-mica-scam-surge-as-fraudsters-impersonate-eu-crypto-regulators/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"PYMNTS: Crypto Scammers Take Advantage of New EU Regulations","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.pymnts.com/cryptocurrency/2026/crypto-scammers-take-advantage-of-new-eu-regulations/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"GNCrypto: EU Warns of Impersonation Scams After MiCA Deadline","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.gncrypto.news/news/eu-impersonation-scams-after-mica-deadline/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoHelp: EU Warns of MiCA Crypto Impersonation Scams","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptocurrencyhelp.com/news/eu-mica-crypto-impersonation-scams/"}]},{"content":"Users who receive communications claiming to be from a regulator or exchange related to MiCA compliance should apply the following verification steps before taking any action. First, check the ESMA interim MiCA register at esma.europa.eu to confirm the specific legal entity claiming to contact you holds valid authorization; authorization of a parent group does not automatically cover subsidiaries. Second, navigate independently to the official website of the claimed sender — type the address you already know, do not click any link in the message. Third, contact the claimed sender's official support channel using contact details from their verified website or application, not those provided in the unsolicited message. Four indicators that a communication is fraudulent: a request to send cryptocurrency, pay a compliance fee, or make a verification transfer; a request for a seed phrase, private key, or recovery phrase; an artificial deadline of hours or days with threats of asset freezing; or a domain, email address, or support number that does not exactly match the claimed entity's official channels. No legitimate exchange or EU financial regulator will ask users to transfer assets to a regulator-controlled wallet, pay a fee to unlock funds, or provide private key material for any compliance process.","heading":"How to Verify Legitimacy","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"SpazioCrypto: MiCA Crypto Scams in Europe: How to Spot Fake Exchanges","type":"news_article","url":"https://en.spaziocrypto.com/security/mica-crypto-scams-europe-fake-exchanges-how-to-protect-yourself/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"FX Daily Report: Crypto Scammers Impersonate MiCA Regulators to Scam Users","type":"news_article","url":"https://fxdailyreport.com/crypto-scammers-impersonate-mica-regulators-to-scam-users/"}]},{"content":"As of August 26, 2026, no aggregate financial loss figures specific to MiCA impersonation scams have been published by ESMA, national regulators, or blockchain analytics firms. No individual perpetrators or organized criminal groups have been publicly named, charged, or prosecuted in connection with this scam wave. The $17 billion figure cited in multiple articles is Chainalysis's estimate for all global crypto scam revenue in 2025 and is not specific to MiCA-related fraud. The claim of up to 10 million displaced EU users is an industry estimate based on total users of non-authorized platforms, not a figure derived from individual victim reports. This page will be updated as enforcement actions, aggregate loss data, or named perpetrators emerge.","heading":"Limitations of This Investigation","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: How the EU's new crypto rules triggered a massive scam wave","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/08/14/mica-s-cleanup-is-creating-a-new-scam-wave-across-the-european-union"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: How the EU's new crypto rules triggered a massive scam wave","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/08/14/mica-s-cleanup-is-creating-a-new-scam-wave-across-the-european-union"},{"credibility":1,"name":"The Block: EU watchdogs warn scammers are posing as crypto firms and regulators after MiCA deadline","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/news/regulation/2026-08-06-eu-watchdogs-warn-crypto-scams-mica-410966"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Yahoo Finance: Scammers Pose as EU Regulators to Prey on MiCA Deadline Fallout","type":"news_article","url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/scammers-pose-eu-regulators-prey-124619269.html"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: Coinbase and OKX try to lure in Binance's EU users after it failed to secure a MiCA license","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/06/27/coinbase-and-okx-try-to-lure-in-binance-s-450m-eu-users-after-failing-to-secure-a-mica-license"},{"credibility":2,"name":"PYMNTS: Crypto Scammers Take Advantage of New EU Regulations","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.pymnts.com/cryptocurrency/2026/crypto-scammers-take-advantage-of-new-eu-regulations/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Coin-Turk: ESMA warns of MiCA scam surge as fraudsters impersonate EU crypto regulators","type":"news_article","url":"https://en.coin-turk.com/esma-warns-of-mica-scam-surge-as-fraudsters-impersonate-eu-crypto-regulators/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Coin-Turk: EU crypto firms warned as impersonation scams rise after MiCA license rule","type":"news_article","url":"https://en.coin-turk.com/eu-crypto-firms-warned-as-impersonation-scams-rise-after-mica-license-rule/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Cryptopolitan: EU warns of crypto scams after MiCA compliance deadline","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptopolitan.com/eu-warns-crypto-scams-mica-deadline/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoTimes: Scammers Pose as Regulators to Exploit EU's MiCA Wind-Down, Watchdogs Warn","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/08/06/scammers-pose-as-regulators-to-exploit-eus-mica-wind-down-watchdogs-warn/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoTimes: MiCA Moves EU Crypto Market Into Post-Deadline Transition","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/08/17/mica-moves-eu-crypto-market-into-post-deadline-transition/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinMarketCap: MiCA Deadline Triggers Fraud Wave as Scammers Pose as EU Watchdogs","type":"news_article","url":"https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/mica-deadline-scams-eu-regulators-crypto"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Coindoo: MiCA Scammers Target EU Crypto Users During Exchange Closures","type":"news_article","url":"https://coindoo.com/mica-scammers-target-eu-crypto-users/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Blockonomi: Cryptocurrency Scams Surge Across EU Following MiCA Licensing Transition","type":"news_article","url":"https://blockonomi.com/cryptocurrency-scams-surge-across-eu-following-mica-licensing-transition/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"FinanceFeeds: EU Regulators Warn of MiCA Migration Scams as 1,700 Crypto Platforms Face EU Exit","type":"news_article","url":"https://financefeeds.com/eu-regulators-warn-of-mica-migration-scams-as-1700-crypto-platforms-face-eu-exit/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"GNCrypto: EU Warns of Impersonation Scams After MiCA Deadline","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.gncrypto.news/news/eu-impersonation-scams-after-mica-deadline/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"FX Daily Report: Crypto Scammers Impersonate MiCA Regulators to Scam Users","type":"news_article","url":"https://fxdailyreport.com/crypto-scammers-impersonate-mica-regulators-to-scam-users/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"SpazioCrypto: MiCA Crypto Scams in Europe: How to Spot Fake Exchanges","type":"news_article","url":"https://en.spaziocrypto.com/security/mica-crypto-scams-europe-fake-exchanges-how-to-protect-yourself/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinInsider: MiCA Migration Deadline Triggers Wave of Crypto Impersonation Scams","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coininsider.org/news/mica-migration-deadline-triggers-wave-of-crypto-impersonation-scams/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoCurrencyHelp: EU Warns of MiCA Crypto Impersonation Scams","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptocurrencyhelp.com/news/eu-mica-crypto-impersonation-scams/"}],"summary":"Following the July 1, 2026 expiry of the EU MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) transitional licensing period, a coordinated wave of impersonation scams emerged targeting EU crypto users displaced from unlicensed platforms. Fraudsters pose as representatives of regulatory authorities — including ESMA, France's AMF, and the Dutch AFM — and as staff of licensed exchanges, directing victims to transfer digital assets to attacker-controlled wallets or counterfeit websites. Multiple EU financial watchdogs have issued formal warnings; no central perpetrator group has been publicly identified or charged as of August 2026.","timeline":[{"date":"2024-12-30","event":"EU MiCA regulation became fully applicable across all member states, with a transitional period allowing existing operators time to obtain authorization.","source":"FinanceFeeds","source_url":"https://financefeeds.com/eu-regulators-warn-of-mica-migration-scams-as-1700-crypto-platforms-face-eu-exit/"},{"date":"2026-06-24","event":"Binance withdrew its MiCA license application in Greece, signaling it would not obtain EU authorization before the July 1 deadline. Coinbase and OKX began actively marketing to Binance's estimated EU user base.","source":"CoinDesk","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/06/27/coinbase-and-okx-try-to-lure-in-binance-s-450m-eu-users-after-failing-to-secure-a-mica-license"},{"date":"2026-07-01","event":"MiCA transitional period expired. Only approximately 323 firms held valid ESMA authorization. Estimates suggested over 1,700 platforms were required to halt or restrict EU services, potentially displacing up to 10 million users. Legitimate migration notices from real exchanges began reaching users simultaneously with fraudulent imitations.","source":"CoinDesk / Cryptopolitan","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/08/14/mica-s-cleanup-is-creating-a-new-scam-wave-across-the-european-union"},{"date":"2026-08-06","event":"The Financial Times reported that multiple EU financial watchdogs — including ESMA, France's AMF, and the Dutch AFM — had issued coordinated warnings about the surge in impersonation scams exploiting the MiCA transition. ESMA confirmed misuse of its name, logo, and branding in active scam campaigns.","source":"The Block","source_url":"https://www.theblock.co/news/regulation/2026-08-06-eu-watchdogs-warn-crypto-scams-mica-410966"},{"date":"2026-08-14","event":"CoinDesk published a detailed investigation documenting the scam wave mechanics, the scale of displaced users, and regulatory responses. The article described the fraud wave as a direct byproduct of the regulatory transition.","source":"CoinDesk","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/08/14/mica-s-cleanup-is-creating-a-new-scam-wave-across-the-european-union"},{"date":"2026-08-17","event":"CryptoTimes reported on ESMA's interim MiCA register reaching 338 registered CASPs by July 31, 2026, a 74% increase from approximately 194 in May, reflecting the accelerated licensing push ahead of the deadline.","source":"CryptoTimes","source_url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/08/17/mica-moves-eu-crypto-market-into-post-deadline-transition/"}]},"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision dfe9f7d7-0b90-4033-82fe-c911692d1198
  2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-08-27 03:48:41Z
    Score: 22 (no score change)
    Unlike the sibling 'wave' page pattern flagged for scrutiny, this page's core framing -- a surge in MiCA-transition-linked impersonation scams -- is genuinely corroborated by on-the-record statements from three separate regulators (ESMA, AMF, AFM) to the Financial Times on August 6, 2026, not manufactured from a single vendor blog post, and the page transparently self-caveats its two largest scale figures ($17B and 10M) as non-MiCA-specific estimates. However, review found three specific, sourced-looking claims that do not hold up: an unsupported assertion that Coinbase, Kraken and OKX were 'reportedly impersonated' (no cited or found source says this), a Binance 'displaced user base of 450 million' figure that contradicts Binance's own contemporaneous 323-million-user disclosure, and an August 17 timeline entry that misattributes a 338-CASP/74%-increase figure to a CryptoTimes article that actually reports 323/~66.5%. Belgium's FSMA is also placed under an 'Entities Impersonated' heading despite its cited action being an unrelated unlicensed-firm warning, not a report of FSMA being impersonated.
    anchorpending
    chain
    hash
    CBiBpqCPB5qQ…iiTMRebCsha256 → base58
    verifying row…
    canonical bytes (1491 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-27T03:48:41.285Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"1620215f-f081-449c-b8c1-deed771b06ff","new_score":2,"page_slug":"mica-transition-impersonation-scam-wave-2026","prev_score":2,"reason":"Unlike the sibling 'wave' page pattern flagged for scrutiny, this page's core framing -- a surge in MiCA-transition-linked impersonation scams -- is genuinely corroborated by on-the-record statements from three separate regulators (ESMA, AMF, AFM) to the Financial Times on August 6, 2026, not manufactured from a single vendor blog post, and the page transparently self-caveats its two largest scale figures ($17B and 10M) as non-MiCA-specific estimates. However, review found three specific, sourced-looking claims that do not hold up: an unsupported assertion that Coinbase, Kraken and OKX were 'reportedly impersonated' (no cited or found source says this), a Binance 'displaced user base of 450 million' figure that contradicts Binance's own contemporaneous 323-million-user disclosure, and an August 17 timeline entry that misattributes a 338-CASP/74%-increase figure to a CryptoTimes article that actually reports 323/~66.5%. Belgium's FSMA is also placed under an 'Entities Impersonated' heading despite its cited action being an unrelated unlicensed-firm warning, not a report of FSMA being impersonated.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision e3f7bd1f-ddaa-48a2-9999-d6b60a4c45e5
  3. #3review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-08-27 03:48:41Z
    Score: 20 (-12)
    The review found 3 of 25 factual claims (12%) disputed, placing this page in the minor-issues range rather than a serious-issues or denial range. The page's central premise -- a genuine wave of impersonation scams tied to the MiCA transition -- held up: it is grounded in on-the-record statements from ESMA, AMF and AFM to the Financial Times, not a single unverified source (claim_findings[0], claim_findings[1]). However, the review identified a claim that named exchanges Coinbase, Kraken and OKX were 'reportedly impersonated' with no source, including the page's own citations, actually saying so (claim_findings[13]) -- a more serious defect than a routine factual slip because it attributes a specific circumstance to identifiable businesses without evidence. It also found a Binance user-count figure that contradicts Binance's own contemporaneous disclosure by over 100 million users, apparently confusing a market-size estimate with an actual user count (claim_findings[14]), and a timeline entry that attributes a statistic to a source article that does not contain it (claim_findings[24]). A regulator, Belgium's FSMA, is placed under an 'entities impersonated' heading even though the source cited for it describes an unrelated enforcement action (claim_findings[12]). These are sourcing and attribution problems that require correction, not evidence the page's core reporting is wrong, so a revision request is warranted rather than escalation to under-investigation status or denial.
    anchorpending
    chain
    hash
    5JQjJgUCRkWf…Fj3Hi31Bsha256 → base58
    verifying row…
    canonical bytes (1882 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T03:48:41.285Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"1620215f-f081-449c-b8c1-deed771b06ff","new_score":0,"page_slug":"mica-transition-impersonation-scam-wave-2026","prev_score":2,"reason":"The review found 3 of 25 factual claims (12%) disputed, placing this page in the minor-issues range rather than a serious-issues or denial range. The page's central premise -- a genuine wave of impersonation scams tied to the MiCA transition -- held up: it is grounded in on-the-record statements from ESMA, AMF and AFM to the Financial Times, not a single unverified source (claim_findings[0], claim_findings[1]). However, the review identified a claim that named exchanges Coinbase, Kraken and OKX were 'reportedly impersonated' with no source, including the page's own citations, actually saying so (claim_findings[13]) -- a more serious defect than a routine factual slip because it attributes a specific circumstance to identifiable businesses without evidence. It also found a Binance user-count figure that contradicts Binance's own contemporaneous disclosure by over 100 million users, apparently confusing a market-size estimate with an actual user count (claim_findings[14]), and a timeline entry that attributes a statistic to a source article that does not contain it (claim_findings[24]). A regulator, Belgium's FSMA, is placed under an 'entities impersonated' heading even though the source cited for it describes an unrelated enforcement action (claim_findings[12]). These are sourcing and attribution problems that require correction, not evidence the page's core reporting is wrong, so a revision request is warranted rather than escalation to under-investigation status or denial.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision eff23a17-c606-43ff-93e1-c69bc635dbcf
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.