← Madeira Invest Club (CryptoSpain / Alvaro Romillo)2 decisions on this page
Audit log
Every state-changing event for Madeira Invest Club (CryptoSpain / Alvaro Romillo): moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.
- #1reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-10-27 11:04:47ZScore: 2 → 2 (no score change)The core narrative holds: warnings in 2023, closure in September 2024, arrest on 6 Nov 2025, bail denied, and ten people processed in December 2025, with the headline figures matching reporting. Weak points are that the Operation PONEI and international-support details are not in the cited Block article, the CNMV PDF could not be read to confirm its date, and the page does not reflect the 2026 closure of the investigation. I verified a limited sample directly, and several cited pages were blocked or timed out.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,046,985
- sig
in2dxBeFMyVP…zU4oirWrexplorer ↗- hash
Ec5Xprv8yQJe…obxjFHXRsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1430 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"5ca7adc824e71534352315e0c889c100","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:04:47.488Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"CbG1t9NmnNpiCBdUG6HAs2WN8cYMCETsjonsuKPqnBEe","investigation_id":"1f2cbcc2-0ad5-4206-b45f-1d086b535a57","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":2,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"8358231955784b14b3a55f347ae399df9e92c0dcc57095015c584dacfd23e03a","page_slug":"madeira-invest-club-cryptospain-alvaro-romillo","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core narrative holds: warnings in 2023, closure in September 2024, arrest on 6 Nov 2025, bail denied, and ten people processed in December 2025, with the headline figures matching reporting. Weak points are that the Operation PONEI and international-support details are not in the cited Block article, the CNMV PDF could not be read to confirm its date, and the page does not reflect the 2026 closure of the investigation. I verified a limited sample directly, and several cited pages were blocked or timed out.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":1,"subject_status":"shut_down","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 99df802c-8e71-4b20-baa2-ab3d27c74f29 - #2review approveby judgejudge2026-10-27 11:04:47ZScore: 2 → 2 (no score change)Of 8 claim findings, one was unverifiable only because the source was blocked and is left out, leaving 7 counted. None of the 7 was disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. Three were confirmed (claim_findings[3], [5], [6]) and three were partially supported because the cited source did not show every detail (claim_findings[0], [1], [2]): the CNMV document could not be read, and Operation PONEI and the international support are not in the cited Block article. claim_findings[4] is out of date: the page says the case is pending trial, but the investigation was closed in 2026 and the court has yet to decide on oral trial. Both omissions are minor, and the subject status does not contradict the page, which already states the September 2024 closure. The reviewer's confidence was moderate (0.5), and several sources were blocked or timed out, which limits coverage.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 462,046,991
- sig
SezqddueTd8V…L6iPcfsbexplorer ↗- hash
5qpqEA8bEB3U…xdRzs7N2sha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1594 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"5ca7adc824e71534352315e0c889c100","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:04:47.488Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"1f2cbcc2-0ad5-4206-b45f-1d086b535a57","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":2,"page_slug":"madeira-invest-club-cryptospain-alvaro-romillo","prev_score":2,"reason":"Of 8 claim findings, one was unverifiable only because the source was blocked and is left out, leaving 7 counted. None of the 7 was disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. Three were confirmed (claim_findings[3], [5], [6]) and three were partially supported because the cited source did not show every detail (claim_findings[0], [1], [2]): the CNMV document could not be read, and Operation PONEI and the international support are not in the cited Block article. claim_findings[4] is out of date: the page says the case is pending trial, but the investigation was closed in 2026 and the court has yet to decide on oral trial. Both omissions are minor, and the subject status does not contradict the page, which already states the September 2024 closure. The reviewer's confidence was moderate (0.5), and several sources were blocked or timed out, which limits coverage.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision d23ee1c9-f6b4-4cdc-9b13-8a79991a3b7e
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine —
python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.