Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Internet Computerreviewed 2026-09-21 · 15 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Internet Computer against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

disputed 2unverifiable 1confirmed 122 corrections pending · 0 applied

disputed

2 claims

The reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.

  1. #2[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Protocol Overview and Background
    “A subsequent institutional funding round closed in 2018, with Andreessen Horowitz and Polychain Capital jointly leading a $102 million raise, bringing total disclosed funding to approximately $164 million.”
    reviewerA 2018 institutional round led by a16z and Polychain raised $102 million, bringing DFINITY's total disclosed funding to approximately $164 millionThe page's own cited source for this sentence (TechCrunch) explicitly states DFINITY had raised 'just over $195 million to date' at the time of the $102M raise, not $164 million; Forbes independently corroborated a figure near $190M the same week. The $164M figure appears to come from a narrower aggregator methodology (summing only the seed + two priced institutional rounds) and is not what the cited source says.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    A subsequent institutional funding round closed in 2018, with Andreessen Horowitz and Polychain Capital jointly leading a $102 million raise, bringing total disclosed funding to just over $195 million.
  2. #8[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Technical Architecture and Security Audits
    “In 2025, security researchers identified an instance of ICP canisters being used as a command-and-control surface by the CanisterWorm malware targeting Iranian systems — this was a misuse of the ICP platform rather than a vulnerability in ICP itself.”
    reviewerIn 2025, security researchers identified CanisterWorm malware using ICP canisters as a command-and-control surface targeting Iranian systemsMultiple independent security-research sources (JFrog, Security Boulevard, Aikido detection timeline) place the CanisterWorm campaign in March 2026, not 2025. This appears to be a simple year error on the page.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    In 2026, security researchers identified an instance of ICP canisters being used as a command-and-control surface by the CanisterWorm malware targeting Iranian systems — this was a misuse of the ICP platform rather than a vulnerability in ICP itself.

unverifiable

1 claim

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #9[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Current Market Position and Price History
    “As of May 2026, ICP trades at approximately $3.20-$3.34 per token, with a market capitalization of approximately $1.76-$1.77 billion, placing it near rank 52 by market cap.”
    reviewerAs of May 2026, ICP traded at approximately $3.20-$3.34 with a market capitalization of approximately $1.76-$1.77 billion, ranked near #52 by market capI could not retrieve authoritative historical price data for the specific May 12, 2026 date cited in the timeline. Secondary reporting from around that period clusters somewhat lower ($2.5-$2.9 / ~$1.4-1.6B) than the page's stated range, but crypto intraday volatility means a brief local high matching the page's figures cannot be ruled out. Flagging as unverifiable rather than disputed given the lack of a definitive same-day data point.

confirmed

12 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Protocol Overview and Background
    “The DFINITY Foundation conducted an initial seed-round in February 2017, raising approximately CHF 3.9 million from roughly 370 participants at a price of $0.03 per ICP token.”
    reviewerDFINITY seed round closed February 2017, raising ~CHF 3.9 million from ~370 participants at $0.03 per ICP tokenFigures match contemporaneous reporting and DFINITY's own account of the 2017 seed round closely.
  2. #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Protocol Overview and Background
    “The protocol's mainnet, referred to as 'Genesis,' launched on May 10, 2021.”
    reviewerThe Internet Computer mainnet ('Genesis') launched on May 10, 2021, with ICP trading above $400 and briefly exceeding $700 intradayCorroborated by CoinGecko's all-time-high date and CoinDesk's contemporaneous reporting.
  3. #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Token Launch and 95% Price Collapse
    “On-chain analysis published by Arkham Intelligence identified approximately 44 wallet addresses believed to belong to DFINITY insiders and the project treasury, which deposited approximately 18.9 million ICP tokens — worth roughly $3.6 billion at prevailing prices — to cryptocurrency exchanges during the weeks immediately following Genesis.”
    reviewerArkham Intelligence identified ~44 wallets linked to DFINITY insiders/treasury that deposited ~18.9 million ICP (~$3.6B) to exchanges, ~75% of total ICP exchange deposits in the period; Arkham could not confirm sales or insider attributionFigures and hedging language match the primary Arkham report closely, including the explicit disclaimer the page also reports (that Arkham could not confirm the tokens were sold or that the wallets were insiders).
  4. #5[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Class-Action Litigation: Securities and Fraud Claims
    “On March 25, 2025, U.S. District Judge James Donato dismissed the primary federal lawsuit, ruling claims were 'time-barred' under the Securities Exchange Act's three-year statute of repose.”
    reviewerJudge James Donato dismissed the primary federal class action on March 25, 2025 as time-barred under the Exchange Act's three-year statute of repose, finding the August 2021 filing ~18 months late, and did not reach the fraud claims on the merits; plaintiffs given until April 8, 2025 to amendWell-supported by multiple independent legal/news sources with matching dates and reasoning.
  5. #6[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Class-Action Litigation: Securities and Fraud Claims
    “Separately, a California Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of DFINITY Foundation on February 10, 2025, on a state-law securities claim, finding that DFINITY was not a statutory seller under Section 12(a)(1).”
    reviewerCalifornia Superior Court granted summary judgment to DFINITY Foundation on February 10, 2025 on the state-law Section 12(a)(1) claim, finding DFINITY was not a statutory sellerAccurately and precisely stated.
  6. #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Token Distribution, Vesting Asymmetry, and Governance Concentration
    “In January 2026, the Mission 70 proposal passed with approximately 53% NNS governance support, targeting a reduction in annual inflation from 9.72% to between 2.92% and 5.42% by end of 2026”
    reviewerMission 70 passed NNS governance in January 2026 with ~53% support, cutting annual inflation from 9.72% toward the 2.92%-5.42% range by end of 2026The 53% figure and the ~9.72%-to-2.92% inflation-cut framing are independently corroborated by multiple secondary sources; the lower bound of the page's stated range (2.92%) matches reporting, though I could not independently verify the upper bound (5.42%) beyond the cited whitepaper.
  7. #10[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Current Market Position and Price History
    “The all-time high of approximately $700.65 was reached in May 2021 at launch; the current price represents approximately a 99.5% decline from that peak.”
    reviewerICP's all-time high of approximately $700.65 was reached in May 2021 and represents a ~99.5% decline from the May 2026 priceATH figure and date are accurate; the percentage decline is consistent with a price in the low single digits.
  8. #11[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Ecosystem Development and Adoption
    “DFINITY has distributed developer grants and announced a $215 million developer ecosystem grant program.”
    reviewerDFINITY distributed a $215 million developer ecosystem grant programConfirmed by cited source and independent corroboration.
  9. #12[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Ecosystem Development and Adoption
    “Chain Fusion integrations provide native connectivity with Bitcoin (ckBTC), Ethereum, and Solana (launched June 2025).”
    reviewerChain Fusion technology enabled Solana connectivity, launched June 2025Date and substance match independent reporting.
  10. #13[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Technical Architecture and Security Audits
    “Chain Fusion technology, providing native cross-chain interoperability with Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana without third-party bridges, saw a reported 1,230% increase in activity in 2024.”
    reviewerChain Fusion activity increased 1,230% in 2024Figure is DFINITY's self-reported statistic but independently repeated by multiple outlets; reasonable to treat as confirmed while noting it originates from the Foundation itself.
  11. #14[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Technical Architecture and Security Audits
    “Security audits of core protocol components have been conducted by Trail of Bits, which assessed both the SNS DAO framework and Chain-key Bitcoin (ckBTC) integration.”
    reviewerTrail of Bits assessed the SNS DAO framework and ckBTC integration with no high-severity issues foundAccurately described; audits and scope match DFINITY's public disclosures.
  12. #15[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Token Distribution, Vesting Asymmetry, and Governance Concentration
    “the DFINITY Foundation and affiliated entities received approximately 50% of total supply with no mandatory vesting schedule; seed-round investors from the 2017 crowdsale received approximately 24.72% distributed as locked neurons with 49 monthly unlocking tranches; institutional investors from the 2018 VC round received approximately 9.5%”
    reviewerGenesis token distribution: ~50% DFINITY/affiliates (no mandatory vesting), ~24.72% seed investors as locked neurons with 49 monthly tranches, ~9.5% institutional investorsThe 24.72% figure is independently corroborated; the 50% foundation/affiliate and 9.5% institutional figures are consistent with the Arkham and Crypto Briefing reporting cited.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.