Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← HookedPadreviewed 2026-11-02 · 5 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read HookedPad against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

partially supported 1confirmed 40 corrections pending · 0 applied

partially supported

1 claim

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #3[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Name confusion with Hooked Protocol
    “announced as the 29th Launchpad project on 2022-11-23 per secondary coverage”
    reviewerHooked Protocol HOOK was announced as the 29th Binance Launchpad project on 2022-11-23The 29th-project claim holds. The exact 11-23 date is not shown by the cited article, which was published 2022-11-24. The timeline's month-level date (2022-11) is fine.

confirmed

4 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Overview and mechanics
    “A Bitrue explainer dated 2026-10-15 describes Hooked as a Solana launchpad using Token-2022 transfer hooks to enforce rules on every transfer.”
    reviewerBitrue explainer dated 2026-10-15 describes Hooked as a Solana launchpad using Token-2022 transfer hooks, with Meteora bonding curves, graduating curves removing the hook and permanent curves keeping itMatches the fetched Bitrue article.
  2. #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Token and fee structure
    “Each bonding-curve trade carries a 1% fee, of which 85% is said to buy and burn HOOKED and 15% goes to development.”
    reviewerHOOKED has fixed supply of 1B, 1% fee with 85% buy-and-burn and 15% development, market cap about $4.8M, liquidity about $215KFigures match the Bitrue snapshot. A Bittime article dated 2026-10-05 gave a different market cap (about $7.61M), so the snapshot figure is time-dependent.
  3. #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Name confusion with Hooked Protocol
    “Forklog reported that a multisig address linked to that project sent about 4.94 million HOOK to Binance shortly before a fund announcement, prompting alleged insider-trading concerns.”
    reviewerForklog reported a multisig linked to Hooked Protocol sent about 4.94M HOOK to Binance shortly before a fund announcement, raising alleged insider-trading concernsSupported. The page correctly hedges and separates this from HookedPad. It gives no date, which is a minor gap (the fund was announced 2023-11-30).
  4. #5[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Name confusion with Hooked Protocol
    “The Bitrue page on HookedPad does not mention Hooked Protocol.”
    reviewerBitrue page on HookedPad does not mention Hooked ProtocolConfirmed on fetch.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.